skip to main content
research-article

The Moderating Effects of Utilitarian and Hedonic Values on Information Technology Continuance

Published:01 July 2012Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

This study examines how the nature of technology affects users’ intention to continue using information technologies. It proposes an extended technology acceptance model, with perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness and pleasure affecting the intention to continue using a technology. We hypothesized that these effects are moderated by the technology’s utilitarian and hedonic values. The model was validated for smartphone functions. A user survey showed that perceived ease of use significantly affected the intention to continue using only for high-utilitarian functions, whereas pleasure affected the intention to continue using only for high-hedonic functions. The effect of perceived ease of use on perceived usefulness was stronger for high-utilitarian than for low-utilitarian functions. The effect of pleasure on perceived usefulness was stronger for high-hedonic than for low-hedonic functions. The results suggest that marketing should consider the nature of the functions.

References

  1. Adams, D., Nelson, R. R., and Todd, P. A. 1992. Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: A replication. MIS Q. 16, 227--247. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Agarwal, R. and Karahanna, E. 2000. Time flies when you’re having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Q. 24, 665--694. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Atkinson, M. and Kydd, C. 1997. Individual characteristics associated with World Wide Web use: An empirical study of playfulness and motivation. Datab. Adv. Inf. Syst. 28, 53--62. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Bagozzi, R., Gopinath, M., and Nyer, P. 1999. The role of emotions in marketing. J. Acad. Market. Sci. 27, 184--206.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Barclay, D., Higgins, C., and Thompson, R. 1995. The partial least squares approach to causal modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration. Tech. Stud. 2, 285--308.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Batra, R. and Ahtola, O. 1991. Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian sources of consumer choice. Market. Lett. 2, 159.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Batra, R. and Ray, M. 1986. Affective responses mediating acceptance of advertising. J. Consum. Resear. 13, 234--249.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Bush, A. J. and Hair, J. F. 1985. An assessment of the mall intercept as a data collection method. J. Market. Resear. 22, 158--167.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Candel, J. M. and Pennings, J. M. E. 1999. Attitude-based models for binary choices: A test for choices involving an innovation. J. Econ. Psych. 20, 481--569.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Chi, M., Bassok, M., Lewis, M., Reimamt, P., and Glaser, R. 1989. Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cogn. Sci. 18, 145--182.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Chin, W. 1998. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In Modern Methods for Business Research, G. Marcoulides Ed., Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 295--333.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., and Newsted, P. R. 2003. A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Inf. Syst. Resear. 14, 189--217. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Davis, F. 1986. A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. Ph.D. dissertation, Sloan School of Management, MIT.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Davis, F. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13, 318--340. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Davis, F., Bagozzi, R., and Warshaw, P. 1989. User acceptance of computer-technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Manage. Sci. 35, 982--1003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Davis, F., Bagozzi, R., and Warshaw, P. 1992. Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. J. Appl. Soc. Psych. 22, 1111--1132.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Deci, E. 1975. Intrinsic Motivation. Plenum, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. DeLone, W. H. and McLean, E. R. 2003. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 19, 9--30. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Egham. 2010. Gartner says worldwide mobile phone sales grew 17 per cent in first quarter 2010. Gartner Newsroom.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Fang, X., Chan, S., Brzezinski, J., and Xu, S. 2005. Moderating effects of task type on wireless technology acceptance. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 22, 123--157. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Festinger, L. 1962. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Fornell, C. and Bookstein, F. 1982. Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. J. Market. Resear. 19, 440--452.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. 1981. Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement errors. J. Market. Resear. 18, 39--50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Gefen, D. and Straub, D. W. 2000. The relative importance of perceived ease of use in IS adoption: A study of ecommerce adoption. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 1, 1--28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Goodhue, D. and Thompson, R. 1995. Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Q. 19, 213--236. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Heider, F. 1946. Attitudes and cognitive organizations. J. Psych. 21, 107--112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Heider, F. 1958. The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. Wiley, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Hoffman, D. and Novak, T. 1996. Marketing in hypermedia computer-mediated environments: conceptual foundations. Amer. Market. Assoc. 60, 50--68.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Holbrook, M. B. and Hirschman, E. C. 1982. The experiential aspects of consumption: Consumer fantasies, feelings and fun. J. Consum. Resear. 9, 132--140.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Hong, S., Thong, J., and Tam, K. 2006. Understanding continued information technology usage behavior: A comparison of three models in the context of mobile internet. Decis. Support Syst. 42, 1819--1834. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Karahanna, E., Straub, W., and Chervany, N. 1999. Information technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Q. 23, 183--213. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Keil, M., Tan, B. C. Y., Wei, K. K., Saarinen, T., Tuunainen, V., and Wassenaar, A. 2000. A cross-cultural study on escalation of commitment behaviour in software projects. MIS Q. 24, 299--325. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Kempf, D. 1999. Attitude formation from product trial: Distinct roles of cognition and affect for hedonic and functional products. Psych. Market. 16, 35--50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Kim, J. and Forsythe, S. 2007. Hedonic usage of product virtualization technologies in online apparel shopping. Int. J. Retail Distrib. Manage. 35, 502--514.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Kim, H., Chan, H., and Chan, Y. 2007. A balanced thinking-feelings model of information systems continuance. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 65, 511--525. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Konana, P. and Balasubramanian, S. 2005. The social-economic-psychological model of technology adoption and usage: An application to online investing. Decis. Support Syst. 39, 505--524. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Laroche, M. 2002. Selected issues in modeling consumer brand choice: The extended competitive vulnerability model. In Essays by Distinguished Marketing Scholars of the Society for Marketing Advances, A. G. Woodside and E. Moore Eds., Elsevier, New York, 69--114.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Lazarus, R. 1991. Emotion and Adaptation. Oxford University Press, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Lee, Y., Kozar, K., and Larsen, K. 2003. The technology acceptance model: Past, present, and future. Comm. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 12, 752--780.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Legris, P., Ingham, J., and Collerette, P. 2003. Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model. Inf. Manag. 40, 191--204. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Li, D., Chau, P., and Lou, H. 2005. Understanding individual adoption of instant messaging: An empirical investigation. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 6, 102--129.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Limayem, M. and Hirt, S. G. 2003. Force of habit and information systems usage: Theory and initial validation. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 4, 65--97.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Lin, J. and Chan, H. 2009. Understanding the beliefs and intentions in search and purchase functions in an E-commerce web site. IEEE Trans. Engin. Manage. 56, 106--114.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Lucas, H. and Spitler, V. 1999. Technology use and performance: A field study of broker workstations. Decis. Sci. 30, 291--311.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Mano, H. and Oliver, R. L. 1993. Assessing the dimensionality and structure of the consumption experience: evaluation, feeling, and satisfaction. J. Consum. Resear. 20, 451--466.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Mathieson, K. 1991. Predicting user intentions: comparing the technology acceptance model with the theory of planned behaviour. Inf. Syst. Resear. 2, 173--191.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Mehrabian, A. and Russell, J. 1974. An Approach to Environmental Psychology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Moon, J. and Kim, Y. 2001. Extending the TAM for a world wide web context. Inf. Manage. 38, 217--230. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Neuman, W. L. 2006. Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Newcomb, T. M. 1953. An approach to the study of communicative acts. Psych. Rev. 60, 393--404.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Newsland. 2007. Newsland published its regular survey of smart mobile device users in USA, Europe and Russia for the first half of 2006. http://www.newsland.net/UserFiles/File/research_060816-2-eng.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Nysveen, H., Pedersen, P., and Thorbjørnsen, H. 2005. Intentions to use mobile services: antecedents and cross-service comparisons. J. Acad. Market. Sci. 33, 1--17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Osgood, C. E. and Tannenbaum, P. H. 1955. The principle of congruity in the prediction of attitude change. Psych. Rev. 62, 42--55.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Pavlou, P. A. and Fygenson, M. 2006. Understanding and predicting electronic commerce adoption: An extension of the theory of planned behavior. MIS Q. 30, 115--143. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Pirolli, P. and Reeker, M. 1994. Learning strategies and transfer in the domain of programming. Cogn. Instr. 12, 235--275.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Podsakoff, P., Mackenzie, S., Lee, J., and Podsakoff, N. 2003. Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psych. Market. 88, 879--903.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Roca, J., Chiu, C., and Martinez, F. 2006. Understanding e-learning intention: an extension of the Technology Acceptance Model. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 64, 628--696. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Rosenberg, M. J. 1956. Cognitive structure and attitudinal affect. J Abnormal Soc. Psych. 53, 367--372.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Russell, J. A. 1980. A circumplex model of affect. J. Person. Soc. Psych. 39, 1160--1178.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Segars, A. H. and Grover, V. 1993. Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness: A confirmatory factor analysis. MIS Q. 17, 517--525. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Starbuck, W. and Webster, J. 1991. When is play productive? Account. Manage. Inf. Techn. 1, 71--90.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Sun, H. and Zhang, P. 2006a. The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 64, 53--78. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Sun, H. and Zhang, P. 2006b. Causal relationships between perceived enjoyment and perceived ease of use: An alternative approach. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 7, 618--645.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Taylor, S. and Todd, P. 1995a. Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience. MIS Q. 19, 561--570. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Taylor, S. and Todd, P. 1995b. Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Inf. Syst. Resear. 6, 144--176.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. Thong, J., Hong, S., and Tam, K. 2006. The effects of post-adoption beliefs on the expectation-disconfirmation model for information technology continuance. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 64, 799--810. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Valacich, J. S., Parboteeah, D. V., and Wells, J. D. 2007. The online consumer’s hierarchy of needs. Comm. ACM 50, 84--90. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. van der Heijden, H. 2002. On the cognitive-affective structure of attitudes toward information systems. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Information Systems. 803--806.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. van der Heijden, H. 2004. User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS Q. 28, 695--704. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Venkatesh, V. 2000. Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating perceived behavioral control, computer anxiety and enjoyment into the Technology Acceptance Model. Inf. Syst. Resear. 11, 342--365. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F. D. 2000. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Manage. Sci. 46, 186--204. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  72. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., and Davis, F. 2003. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27, 425--478. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. Venkatesh, V., Speier, C., and Morris, M. 2002. User acceptance enablers in individual decision making about technology: Toward an integrated model. Decis. Sci. 33, 297--316.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. Wakefield, R. L. and Whitten, D. 2006. Mobile computing: a user study on hedonic/utilitarian mobile device usage. Euro. J. Inf. Syst. 15, 292--300.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. Yi, M. and Hwang, Y. 2003. Predicting the use of web-based information systems: self-efficacy, enjoyment, learning goal orientation, and the technology acceptance model. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 59, 431--449. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The Moderating Effects of Utilitarian and Hedonic Values on Information Technology Continuance

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          • Published in

            cover image ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
            ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction  Volume 19, Issue 2
            July 2012
            226 pages
            ISSN:1073-0516
            EISSN:1557-7325
            DOI:10.1145/2240156
            Issue’s Table of Contents

            Copyright © 2012 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 1 July 2012
            • Revised: 1 January 2012
            • Accepted: 1 January 2012
            • Received: 1 November 2009
            Published in tochi Volume 19, Issue 2

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader