skip to main content
10.1145/1518701.1518861acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

UbiGreen: investigating a mobile tool for tracking and supporting green transportation habits

Published:04 April 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

The greatest contributor of CO2 emissions in the average American household is personal transportation. Because transportation is inherently a mobile activity, mobile devices are well suited to sense and provide feedback about these activities. In this paper, we explore the use of personal ambient displays on mobile phones to give users feedback about sensed and self-reported transportation behaviors. We first present results from a set of formative studies exploring our respondents' existing transportation routines, willingness to engage in and maintain green transportation behavior, and reactions to early mobile phone "green" application design concepts. We then describe the results of a 3-week field study (N=13) of the UbiGreen Transportation Display prototype, a mobile phone application that semi-automatically senses and reveals information about transportation behavior. Our contributions include a working system for semi-automatically tracking transit activity, a visual design capable of engaging users in the goal of increasing green transportation, and the results of our studies, which have implications for the design of future green applications.

References

  1. Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C.,&Rothengatter, T. (2005). A review of intervention studies aimed at household energy conservation. J. of Environmental Psychology, 25:273--291.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Ampt, E. (2003). Understanding voluntary travel behavior change. 26th Australasian Transport Research Forum, 22.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bin, S., Dowlatabadi, H., (2005). Consumer lifestyle approach to US energy use and the related CO2 emissions. Energy Policy, 33:197--208.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Carter, S. and Mankoff, J. (2005). When participants do the capturing: the role of media in diary studies. CHI'05, 899--908. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Carter, S., Mankoff, J. and Heer, J. (2007). Momento: Support for situated ubicomp evaluation. CHI'07, 125--134. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Carter, S., Mankoff, J., Klemmer, S. and Matthews, T. (2008). Exiting the cleanroom: On ecological validity and ubiquitous computing. HCI Journal 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Chamberlain, A., Benford, S., Greenhalgh, C., Hamphsire, A., Tandavanitj, N., Adams, M., Oldroyd, A.&Sutton, J. (2007). Professor Tanda: Greener gaming&pervasive play. DUX'07. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Choudhury, T., et al. (2008). The Mobile Sensing Platform: An Embedded System for Capturing and Recognizing Human Activities. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 7(2). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Consolvo, S., Harrison, B., Smith, I., Chen, M. Y., Everitt, K., Froehlich, J., Landay, J. (2007). Conducting in situ evaluations for and with ubiquitous computing technologies. IJHCI, 22(1-2):103--118.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Consolvo, S., McDonald, D. W., Toscos, T., Chen, M. Y., Froehlich, J., Harrison, B., Klasnja, P., LaMarca, A., LeGrand, L., Libby, R., Smith, I., Landay, J. A. (2008). Activity sensing in the wild: A field trial of UbiFit Garden. CHI'08, 1797--1806. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Csikszentmihalyi, M. and Larson, R. (1987). Validity and reliability of the Experience Sampling Method. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 175(9):526--536.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. De Young, R. (2003). Expanding and Evaluating Motives for Environmentally Responsible Behavior. J. of Social Issues, 56(3):509--526.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Dillahunt, T., Becker, G., Mankoff, J. and Kraut, R. (2008). Motivating environmentally sustainable behavior changes with a virtual polar bear. Pervasive'08 Workshop on Pervasive Persuasive Technology and Environmental Sustainability.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Donath, J. (2004). Artificial Pets: Simple Behaviors Elicit Complex Attachments. In M. Bekoff (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Animal Behavior, Greenwood Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Fischer, C. (2008). Feedback on household electricity consumption: a tool for saving energy? Energy Efficiency 2008, 1:79--104Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Fogg, B.J. (2002). Persuasive Computer: Using Technology to Change What We Think and Do. Morgan Kaufman: SF, CA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Frank, L. D., Saelens, B. E., Powell, K. E.&Chapman, J. E. (2007). Stepping towards causation: Do built environments or neighborhood and travel preferences explain physical activity, driving, and obesity? Social Science and Medicine 65:1898--1914Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Froehlich, J., Chen, M., Consolvo, S., Harrison, B.,&Landay, J. (2007) MyExperience: A System for In Situ Tracing and Capturing of User Feedback on Mobile Phones, MobiSys 2007, 57--70. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Froehlich, J. and Krumm, J. (2008). Route prediction from trip observations, Intelligent Vehicle Initiative (IVI) Technology Advanced Controls&Navigation Systems, SAE World Congress&Exhibition, Detroit, Michigan, April 14-17, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Hansen, J. (2006). The threat to the planet. New York Review of Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Higgins, E.T. Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles, Guilford Press, New York, 1996, 133--168.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Hu, P.S. and T.R. Reuscher. (2004). Summary of Travel Trends, 2001 National Household Travel Survey, U.S.F.H.A. U.S. Department of Transportation, Editor. 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Li, Y. and Landay, J. (2008). Activity-based prototyping of ubicomp applications for long-lived, everyday human activities. In Proc. CHI'08, 1303--1312. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Matthews, T. (2007). Designing and evaluating glanceable peripheral visualizations, Ph.D. Thesis, EECS Department, UC Berkeley. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Myers, O.E. Jr., Saunders C.D. (2002). Animals as links toward developing caring relationships with the natural world. In Kahn and Kelert (eds). Children and Nature, 153--178.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Maibach, E. W. (2003). Recreating communities to support active living: A new role for social marketing. American Journal of Health Promotion 18(1):114--119.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Mankoff, J, Matthews, D., Fussell, S.R., Johnson, M. (2007). Leveraging social networks to motivate individuals to reduce their ecological footprints. HICSS '07, 87 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Petersen, J. E, Shunturov, V., Janda, K., Platt, G.&Weinberger, K. (2005). Does providing dormitory residents with feedback on energy and water use lead to reduced consumption? Greening the Campus VI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Saponas, T., Lester, J., Froehlich, J, Fogarty, J., Landay, J. 2008. iLearn on the iPhone: Real-Time Human Activity Classification on Commodity Mobile Phones. UW-CSE-08-04--02 Tech Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Sohn, T., et al. (2006). Mobility detection using everyday GSM traces. Ubicomp'06, 212--224. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Stasko, J., Mccolgin, D., Miller, T., Plaue, C.&Pousman, Z. (2005). Evaluating the InfoCanvas peripheral awareness system: A longitudinal, in situ study. Technical Report GIT-GVU-05-08Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. U.S. Department of Energy (2006) Annual Energy Review 2005. Energy Information Administration, Washington, DC DOE/EIA-0384.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Vining, J. (2003). The connection to other animals and caring for nature. Human Ecology Review, 10(2).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Wash, R., Hemphill, L. and Resnick, P. (2005). Design decisions in the RideNow project. SIGGROUP'05, 132--135. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Weber, C. L.&Matthews, H. S. (2008). Quantifying the global&distributional aspects of American household carbon footprint. Ecological Economics. Elsevier, vol. 66(2-3), pp 379--391Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. UbiGreen: investigating a mobile tool for tracking and supporting green transportation habits

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '09: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2009
      2426 pages
      ISBN:9781605582467
      DOI:10.1145/1518701

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 April 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '09 Paper Acceptance Rate277of1,130submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader