Eric van Heck
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract
Realizing scenarios in which business is conducted through a rapidly formed network with anyone, anywhere, anytime regardless of different computer systems and business processes.
- Barabási, A.L. Linked---How Everything Is Connected to Everything Else and What It Means for Business, Science, and Everyday Life. Penguin Group, New York, 2003.Google Scholar
- Bonabeau, E. and Meyer, C. Swarm intelligence: A whole new way to think about business. Harvard Business Review (May 2001), 106--114.Google Scholar
- Braha, D. and Bar-Yam, Y. Information flow structure in large-scale product development organizational networks. Journal of Information Technology 19, 4 (Dec. 2004), 244--253.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Burt, R.S. Structural Holes---The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992.Google Scholar
- Golden, W., Hughes, M., and Burke, H. Node to network: Partnerships in the secondhand book trade. In P. Vervest et al., Smart Business Networks, Springer, Heidelberg-New York, 2005.Google Scholar
- Goldman, S.L., Nagel, R.N., and Preiss, K. Agile Competitors and Virtual Organizations: Strategies for Enriching the Customer. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1995.Google Scholar
- Holland, C., Shaw, D.R., Westwood, J.B., and Harris, I. Marketing translation services internationally: Exploiting IT to achieve a smart network. Journal of Information Technology 19, 4 (Dec. 2004), 254--260.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hoogeweegen, M., Teunissen, W.J., Vervest, P.H.M., and Wagenaar, R. Modular network design: Using information and communications technology to allocate production tasks in a virtual organization. Decision Sciences 30, 4 (Fall 1999), 1073--1103.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kambil, A. and van Heck, E. Making Markets: How Firms Can Design and Profit from Online Auctions and Exchanges. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA, 2002. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Konsynski, B. and Tiwani, A. The improvisation-efficiency paradox in inter-firm electronic networks: Governance and architecture considerations. Journal of Information Technology 19, 4 (Dec. 2004), 234--243.Google ScholarCross Ref
- van Heck, E., Preiss, K., and Pau, L-F. Smart Business Networks. Springer, Heidelberg-New York, 2005.Google Scholar
- van Liere, D.W. Dynamics of Network Positions. RSM Erasmus University, ERIM Ph.D series, May 2007.Google Scholar
- Busquets, J. Multiasistencia on the Internet (A), (B), and (C). Teaching Cases, DVD Multimedia and Teaching Note, European Case Clearing House, 2006; www.ecch.com.Google Scholar
- Nohria, N. and Ghoshal, S. The Differentiated Network. Jossey-Bass, 1997.Google Scholar
- Von Hippel, E. Democratizing Innovation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2005.Google Scholar
- Burt, R.S. Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992.Google Scholar
- Hoogeweegen, M.R., van Liere, D.W., Vervest, P.H.M., Hagdorn van der Meijden, L., and de Lepper, I. Strategizing for mass customization by playing the business networking game. Decision Support Systems 42, 3 (Mar. 2006), 1402--1412. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Smart business networks: how the network wins
Recommendations
Adaptability in smart business networks: An exploratory case in the insurance industry
A focal characteristic of Smart Business Networks (SBN) is their ability to adapt to the environment. We think that the capacity to adapt, or adaptability of Smart Business Networks, requires more attention and formalization in the managerial discourse ...
Comments