Pavan Sikka
ABSTRACT
Agriculture accounts for a significant portion of the GDP in most developed countries. However, managing farms, particularly large-scale extensive farming systems, is hindered by lack of data and increasing shortage of labour. We have deployed a large heterogeneous sensor network on a working farm to explore sensor network applications that can address some of the issues identified above. Our network is solar powered and has been running for over 6 months. The current deployment consists of over 40 moisture sensors that provide soil moisture profiles at varying depths, weight sensors to compute the amount of food and water consumed by animals, electronic tag readers, up to 40 sensors that can be used to track animal movement (consisting of GPS, compass and accelerometers), and 20 sensor/actuators that can be used to apply different stimuli (audio, vibration and mild electric shock) to the animal. The static part of the network is designed for 24/7 operation and is linked to the Internet via a dedicated high-gain radio link, also solar powered. The initial goals of the deployment are to provide a testbed for sensor network research in programmability and data handling while also being a vital tool for scientists to study animal behavior. Our longer term aim is to create a management system that completely transforms the way farms are managed.
- D. Anderson. Animal control system using global positioning and instrumental animal conditioning. US Patent Number 6232880, May 2001. patent.Google Scholar
- G. J. Bishop-Hurley, D. L. Swain, D. M. Anderson, P. Corke, P. Sikka, and C. Crossman. Understanding interactions between autonomous animal control and temperament when cattle are subjected to virtual fencing applications. In Horizons in Livestock Sciences - Redesigning Animal Agriculture, 2005.Google Scholar
- P. Corke, S. Hrabar, R. Peterson, D. Rus, S. Saripalli, and G. Sukhatme. Deployment and connectivity repair for a sensor network with a flying robot. In International Symposium on Experimental Robotics, June 2004.Google Scholar
- J. Hill, R. Szewczyk, A. Woo, S. Hollar, D. Culler, and K. Pister. System architecture directions for network sensors. In Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, 2000. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Hui and D. Culler. The dynamic behavior of a data dissemination protocol for network programming at scale. In The 2nd ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys04), 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Juang, H. Oki, Y. Wang, M. Martonosi, L.-S. Peh, and D. Rubenstein. Energy-efficient computing for wildlife tracking: Design tradeoffs and early experiences with zebranet. In Tenth International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS-X). ACM Press, 2002. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Kotz, C. Newport, and C. Elliott. The mistaken axioms of wireless-network research. Computer Science TR2003-467, Dartmouth College, July 2003.Google Scholar
- R. C. Shah, S. Roy, S. Jain, and W. Brunette. Data mules: Modeling a three-tier architecture for sparse sensor network. In IEEE Workshop on Sensor Network Protocols and Applications (SNPA). IEEE, 2003.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. Sikka, P. Corke, and L. Overs. Wireless sensor devices for animal tracking and control. In First IEEE Workshop on Embedded Networked Sensors in 29th Conference on Local Computer Networks, pages 446--454, 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Szewczyk, A. Mainwaring, J. Polastre, J. Anderson, and D. Culler. An analysis of a large scale habitat monitoring application. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems, pages 214--226. ACM Press, 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. Tolle, J. Polastre, R. Szewczyk, D. Culler, N. Turner, K. Tu, S. Burgess, and T. Dawson. A macroscope in the redwoods. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, pages 51--63. ACM Press, 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. Werner-Allen, P. Swieskowski, and M. Welsh. Motelab: A wireless sensor network testbed. In The Fourth International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Z.Butler, P. Corke, R. Peterson, and D. Rus. Virtual fences for controlling cows. In International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pages 4429--4436, New Orleans, Apr. 2004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- P. Zhang, C. M. Sadler, S. Lyon, and M. Martonosi. Hardware design experiences in zebranet. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Embedded networked sensor systems. ACM Press, 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Wireless adhoc sensor and actuator networks on the farm
Recommendations
Deploying a Wireless Sensor Network on an Active Volcano
Augmenting heavy and power-hungry data collection equipment with lighter, smaller wireless sensor network nodes leads to faster, larger deployments. Arrays comprising dozens of wireless sensor nodes are now possible, allowing scientific studies that ...
Communication protocols for sensor networks
Wireless sensor networksThis chapter describes about the challenges and essence of designing communication protocols for wireless sensor networks. The sensor nodes are densely deployed and collaboratively work together to provide higher quality sensing in time and space as ...
Testbed Environment for Wireless Sensor and Actuator Networks
ICSNC '10: Proceedings of the 2010 Fifth International Conference on Systems and Networks CommunicationsThe Wireless Sensor and Actuator Networks (WSAN’s), defines collaborative operations between the sensors and the actuators, enabling distributed sensing of a physical phenomenon. In this paper, an integrated testbed consisted of wireless sensor network, ...
Comments