Jason Swarts
ABSTRACT
Cooperative writing requires a coordinated, engineered process. Groups must achieve coordination at three levels: a shared contextual motivation that translates into group actions, which operationalize as drafting activities. The arrangement of material resources in face-to-face settings supports those communication events. When efforts at coordination are moved online, however, the material and temporal means of support change. Coordination efforts become distributed over time and media, affecting the quality of coordination achieved.
This paper explores the ways that a group of writers built coordination through while drafting a survey research instrument. Based on this case study, I recommend ways to consider technology purchases to support cooperation.
- Couture, B., and Rymer, J. Discourse interaction between writer and supervisor: A primary collaboration in workplace writing. In M.M. Lay and W.M. Karis (eds.) Collaborative Writing in Industry: Investigations in Theory and Practice. Baywood Press, Amityville, NY, 1991, 87--108.Google Scholar
- Ede, L., and Lunsford, A. Singular Texts/Plural Authors: Perspectives on Collaborative Writing. Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, IL, 1990.Google Scholar
- Hutchins, E. Cognition in the Wild. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1995.Google Scholar
- Kim, H., and Eklundh, K.S. Reviewing practices in collaborative writing. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 10 (2001), 247--259. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kuutti, K. Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In B.A. Nardi (ed.) Context and Consciousness. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1996, 17--44. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Middleton, D. Talking work: Argument, common knowledge, and improvisation in teamwork. In Y. Engeström and D. Middleton (eds.) Cognition and Communication at Work. Cambridge UP, New York, 1998, 233--256.Google Scholar
- Noël, S., and Robert, J. Empirical study on collaborative writing: What do co-authors do, use, and like? Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 13 (2004), 63--89. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Plowman, L. Tracing the Evolution of a Co-authored Text. CSRP 367. University of Sussex, Brighton, 1995.Google Scholar
- Sellen, A.J., and Harper, R.H.R. The Myth of the Paperless Office. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2002. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Winsor, D.A. Learning to do knowledge work in systems of distributed cognition. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 15, 1 (2001), 5--28.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wood, C.C. A Cultural-cognitive Approach to Collaborative Writing. CSRP 242. University of Sussex, Brighton, 1992.Google Scholar
- Yates, J. Control through Communication: The Rise of System in American Management. The Johns Hopkins UP, Baltimore, 1993.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Cooperative writing: achieving coordination together and apart
Recommendations
Lark: Coordinating Co-located Collaboration with Information Visualization
Large multi-touch displays are expanding the possibilities of multiple-coordinated views by allowing multiple people to interact with data in concert or independently. We present Lark, a system that facilitates the coordination of interactions with ...
Improving revision in wiki-based writing
Wiki-based writing possesses a great deal of educational potential, yet students face difficulties while writing a shared document. Revising a shared document, in particular, seems to be a demanding activity for students. This study investigated whether ...
A Service Oriented Architecture for Coordination in Collaborative Environments
An important feature in collaborative environment is coordination, defined as the act of managing interdependencies between activities performed to achieve a goal. These interdependencies can be the result of loosely integrated collaborative activities ...
Comments