Skip to main content
Log in

Efficiency of Plasmonic Photothermal Therapy of Experimental Tumors

  • BIOPHOTONICS
  • Published:
Optics and Spectroscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic factors of plasmonic photothermal therapy (PPT) efficiency in rats with transplanted liver cancer on the basis of assessment of the degree of tumor vascularization. Before any exposure, rats with transplanted liver cancer PC-1 were subjected to Doppler ultrasonography to assess the degree of vascularization of transplanted tumors. Half of the animals with the transplanted tumors were withdrawn from the experiment after Doppler ultrasonography to determine the content of vascular factors in blood serum by enzyme immunoassay and in tumor tissue by immunohistochemical method. After three intravenous injections of polyethylene glycol-coated gold nanorods (GNRs) at a dose of 0.4 mq/mL, the transplanted tumors were irradiated percutaneously with infrared laser radiation at a wavelength of 808 nm, followed by thermography of local tumor heating. The animals were withdrawn from the experiment 24 h later, and tumor tissue samples were taken for histological examination. It is found that the accumulation of gold in the tumor tissue and the PPT efficiency at repeated intravenous GNR injections are determined by the presence of formed vasculature in the tumor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. E. Courtine, A. Cariou, and J. P. Mira, Crit Care Med. 37, S50 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. L. A. Dykman and N. G. Khlebtsov, Biochemistry (Moscow) 81, 1771 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Bucharskaya, G. Maslyakova, G. Terentyuk, A. Yakunin, Y. Avetisyan, O. Bibikova, E. Tuchina, B. Khlebtsov, N. Khlebtsov, and V. Tuchin, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 17, 1295 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17081295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Park, A. Estrada, K. Sharp, K. Sang, J. A. Schwartz, D. K. Smith, C. Coleman, J. D. Payne, B. A. Korgel, A. K. Dunn, and J. W. Tunnell, Opt. Express, No. 16, 1590 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.16.001590

  5. E. Perez-Herrero and A. Fernandez-Medarde, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 93, 52 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2015.03.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. J. Chen, C. Glaus, R. Laforest, Q. Zhang, M. Yang, M. Gidding, M. J. Welch, and Y. Xia, Small 6, 811 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.200902216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J. Fang, H. Nakamura, and H. Maeda, Adv. Drug. Deliv. Rev. 63, 136 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2010.04.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. A. F. Karamysheva, Biochemistry (Moscow) 73, 751 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Samsung Medison. VOCAL Program—Calculation of Structure Volumes (ZD Ultrasound). https://www.medison.ru/tn/vocal.htm.

  10. B. Khlebtsov, V. Khanadeev, T. Pylaev, and N. Khlebtsov, J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 6317 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp2000078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. A. B. Bucharskaya, G. N. Maslyakova, N. I. Dikht, N. A. Navolokin, G. S. Terentyuk, A. N. Bashkatov, E. A. Genina, B. N. Khlebtsov, N. G. Khlebtsov, and V. V. Tuchin, BioNano Sci. 7, 216 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12668-016-0320-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. M. Shibuya, J. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 39, 469 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  13. W. T. Yang, G. Tse, P. Lam, C. Metreweli, and J. Chang, Ultrasound. Med. 21, 1227 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. N. G. Khlebtsov and L. A. Dykman, Chem. Soc. Rev. 40, 1647 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1039/C0CS00018C

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. N. Ferrara, Eur. Cytokine. Netw. 20, 158 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1684/ecn.2009.0170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Y. Hori, K. Ito, S. Hamamichi, Ozawa Y, J. Matsui, I. O. Umeda, and H. Fujii, Anticancer Res. 37, 6629 (2017). https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.12120

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Work performed under the state assignment of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation “Molecular Markers and Gold Nanoparticles: Application in Theranostics in Experimental and Clinical Oncology” (state registration no. 0203042330329) and the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project no. 18-52-7803 (Ital-t)).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. B. Bucharskaya.

Ethics declarations

Statement on the Welfare of Animals

The study was performed in accordance with international ethical standards of the European Convention for the protection of vertebrate animals for experimental and other scientific purposes (Strasbourg, 1986) as well as in accordance with the recommendations of the Committee on E-thics of the Razumovskii Saratov State Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Minutes no. 6 of February 6, 2018). All applicable international, national, and/or institutional principles of care and use of animals were observed.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Translated by M. Batrukova

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bucharskaya, A.B., Maslyakova, G.N., Chekhonatskaya, M.L. et al. Efficiency of Plasmonic Photothermal Therapy of Experimental Tumors. Opt. Spectrosc. 128, 849–854 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0030400X2006003X

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0030400X2006003X

Keywords:

Navigation