Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An improved Mualem–Van Genuchten method and its verification using data on Beit Netofa clay

  • Soil Physics
  • Published:
Eurasian Soil Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An improved Mualem–Van Genuchten method for estimating soil hydraulic conductivity in the vadose zone from data on filtration coefficient and water-retention capacity of soil is proposed. The approach offered by Kosugi for a functional description of hydraulic conductivity of soil is applied. To calculate the values of hydraulic conductivity by Mualem’s formula, the function of differential water capacity of soil with interpreted parameters has been used instead of the function of integral water capacity of soil, which describes the water-retention capacity of soil. Approximations to functions of soil water-retention capacity and hydraulic conductivity are offered here. On the basis of some concepts on the specificity of the curve that describes soil water-retention capacity, a technique for identification of these parameters is developed. The experimental data from two parts of capillary pressure range, on which the water-retention capacity of soil is measured, are used in the technique. The first part corresponds to the zone of mainly film moisture, where the sorption component of the capillary-sorption forces retaining the water in the soil predominates. The second part includes (a) the zone of the mainly capillary-suspended moisture, where the capillary component of the capillary-sorption forces predominates, and (b) the zone of the capillary-backed moisture. The improved method for estimating relative values of hydraulic conductivity of soil has been verified with the use of measured data for the Beit Netofa Сlay soil. The advantages of this method include (a) the ability to identify parameters of the soil hydrophysical functions using relatively available soil indices and (b) the higher accuracy of calculating the soil hydraulic conductivity in comparison with the original version of the method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. D. Voronin, Fundamentals of Soil Physics (Moscow State Univ., Moscow, 1986) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. M. Globus, Experimental Hydrophysics of Soils (Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad, 1969) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. M. Globus, Soil-Hydrophysical Support of Agroecological Mathematical Models (Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad, 1987) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. N. Michurin, Doctoral Dissertation in Agriculture (Moscow, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. V. Nerpin and A. F. Chudnovskii, Soil Physics (Nauka, Moscow, 1967) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  6. I. I. Sudnitsyn, New Assessment Methods of Hydrophysical Properties of Soils and Water Supply of Forest (Nauka, Moscow, 1966) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  7. N. N. Semenova, V. V. Terleev, G. I. Suhoruchenko, E. E. Orlova, and N. E. Orlova, “On One Method for the Numerical Solution of a System of Parabolic Equations,” Vestnik of St.-Petersb. Univ., Ser. 1: Mathematics. 49 (2), 138–146 (2016). doi 10.3103/ S1063454116020138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. V. V. Terleev, V. L. Badenko, A. G. Topaj, W. Mirschel, and I. Yu. Guseva, “Advantages of the improved Mualem–Van Genuchten approach on the example of clay soil,” Agrofizika, No. 4 (16), 27–34 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  9. V. V. Terleev, M. A. Narbut, A. G. Topaj, and W. Mirschel, “Modeling the hydrophysical properties of the soil as a capillary-porous medium and modification of the Mualem–Van Genuchten approach: theory,” Agrofizika, No. 2 (14), 35–44 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  10. V. V. Terleev, A. G. Topaj, W. Mirschel, and P. D. Gurin, “Modelling the water-retention curve on the base of the concept of capillary hysteresis and lognormal pore-size distribution of soil: theory,” Agrofizika, No. 1, 9–19 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  11. V. V. Terleev, A. G. Topaj, W. Mirschel, and P. D. Gurin, “Modelling the main drainage and moistening branches of hysteretic loop inherent for the soil water-retention capacity,” Agrofizika, No. 1, 22–29 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  12. V. V. Terleev, W. Mirschel, V. L. Badenko, I. Yu. Guseva, and P. D. Gurin, “Physical-statistical interpretation of the parameters of the soil water retention function,” Agrofizika, No. 4, 1–8 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  13. E. V. Shein, A Course on Soil Physics (Moscow State Univ., Moscow, 2005) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  14. E. V. Shein, “Physically based mathematical models in soil science: history, current state, problems, and outlook (analytical review),” Eurasian Soil Sci. 48, 712–718 (2015). doi 10.1134/S1064229315070091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. L. R. Ahuja and D. Swartzendruber, “An improved form of soil-water diffusivity function,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 36, 9–14 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. V. Badenko, V. Terleev, N. Arefiev, Ju. Volkova, and O. Nikonova, “Agro-ecosystem model AGROTOOL coupled with GIS for simulation of the spatial variability of the soil hydrophysical properties,” The 2015 AASRI International Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (IEA 2015) (London, 2015), pp. 452–455.

    Google Scholar 

  17. V. Badenko, V. Terleev, and A. Topaj, “AGROTOOL software as an intellectual core of decision support systems in computer aided agriculture,” Appl. Mech. Mater. 635–637, 1688–1691 (2014). doi 10.4028/www. scientific.net/AMM.635-637.1688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. W. Brutsaert, “A concise parameterization of the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils,” Adv. Water Resour. 23, 811–815 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. W. Brutsaert, “Probability laws for pore-size distribution,” Soil Sci. 101, 85–92 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. R. Haverkamp, M. Vauclin, J. Touma, P. J. Wierenga, and G. Vachaud, “A comparison of numerical simulation model for one-dimensional infiltration,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 41, 285–294 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. K. Kosugi, “General model for unsaturated hydraulic conductivity for soil with lognormal pore-size distribution,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 63, 270–277 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. K. Kosugi, “Lognormal distribution model for unsaturated soil hydraulic properties,” Water Resour. Res. 32, 2697–2703 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. K. Kosugi, “Three-parameter lognormal distribution model for soil water retention,” Water Resour. Res. 30, 891–901 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. K. Kosugi and J. W. Hopmans, “Scaling water retention curves for soils with lognormal pore-size distribution,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 62, 1496–1505 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. K. Levenberg, “A method for the solution of certain non-linear problems in least squares,” Quart. Appl. Math. 2, 164–168 (1944).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. D. W. Marquardt, “An algorithm for least-square estimation on non-linear parameters,” J. Soc. Ind. Appl. Math. 11, 431–441 (1963).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. S. Medvedev, A. Topaj, V. Badenko, and V. Terleev, “Medium-term analysis of agroecosystem sustainability under different land use practices by means of dynamic crop simulation,” IFIP Adv. Inf. Commun. Technol. 448, 252–261 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Y. Mualem, A Catalogue of the Hydraulic Properties of Unsaturated Soils: Research Project 442 (Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Y. Mualem, “A new model for predicting hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media,” Water Resour. Res. 12, 513–522 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. R. A. Poluektov, S. M. Fintushal, I. V. Oparina, D. V. Shatskikh, V. V. Terleev, and E. T. Zakharova, “AGROTOOL—a system for crop simulation,” Arch. Agron. Soil Sci. 48 (6), 609–635 (2002). doi 10.1080/ 0365034021000041597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. R. A. Poluektov, I. V. Oparina, and V. V. Terleev, “Three methods for calculating soil water dynamics,” Russ. Meteorol. Hydrol., No. 11, 61–67 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  32. R. A. Poluektov and V. V. Terleev, “Crop simulation model of the second and the third productivity levels,” in Modeling Water and Nutrient Dynamics in Soil-Crop Systems (Springer-Verlag, Dordrecht, 2007), pp. 75–89. doi 10.1007/978-1-4020-4479-3_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. R. A. Poluektov and V. V. Terleev, “Modeling of the water retention capacity and differential moisture capacity of soil,” Russ. Meteorol. Hydrol., No. 11, 70–75 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  34. R. A. Poluektov and V. V. Terleev, “Modeling the moisture retention capacity of soil with agricultural and hydrological characteristics,” Russ. Meteorol. Hydrol., No. 12, 73–77 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  35. E. Rawitz, PhD Thesis (Hebrew Univ., Rehovot, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  36. L. A. Richards, “Capillary conduction of liquids through porous mediums,” J. Appl. Phys. 1 (5), 318–333 (1931).

    Google Scholar 

  37. V. Terleev, V. Badenko, I. Guseva, and W. Mirschel, “Enhanced Mualem–Van Genuchten approach for estimating relative soil hydraulic conductivity,” Appl. Mech. Mater. 725–726, 355–360 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. V. V. Terleev, W. Mirschel, U. Schindler, and K.-O. Wenkel, “Estimation of soil water retention curve using some agrophysical characteristics and Voronin’s empirical dependence,” J. Int. Agrophys. 24 (4), 381–387 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  39. V. Terleev, A. Nikonorov, V. Badenko, I. Guseva, Yu. Volkova, O. Skvortsova, S. Pavlov, and W. Mirschel, “Modeling of hydrophysical properties of the soil as capillary-porous media and improvement of Mualem–Van Genuchten method as a part of foundation arrangement research,” Adv. Civil Eng. 2016, art. ID 8176728, 1–7 (2016). doi 10.1155/2016/8176728

    Google Scholar 

  40. V. Terleev, E. Petrovskaia, N. Sokolova, A. Dashkina, I. Guseva, V. Badenko, Yu. Volkova, O. Skvortsova, O. Nikonova, S. Pavlov, A. Nikonorov, V. Garmanov, and W. Mirschel, “Mathematical modeling of hydrophysical properties of soils in engineering and reclamation surveys,” Proceedings of International Scientific Conference Week of Science in St. Petersburg–Civil Engineering (SPbWOSCE–2015) (Curran Associates, Red Hook, 2016), Vol. 53, pp. 1–6. doi 10.1051/matecconf/2016530101310.1051/matecconf/20165301013

    Google Scholar 

  41. V. V. Terleev, A. G. Topaj, and W. Mirschel, “The improved estimation for the effective supply of productive moisture considering the hysteresis of soil waterretention capacity,” Russ. Meteorol. Hydrol. 40 (4), 278–285 (2015). doi 10.3103/S106837391504007X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. M. Th. van Genuchten, “A closed form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44, 892–898 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. H. Vereecken, M. Weynants, M. Javaux, Y. Pachepsky, M. G. Schaap, and M. Th. van Genuchten, “Using pedotransfer functions to estimate the van Genuchten–Mualem soil hydraulic properties: a review,” Vadose Zone J. 9, 795–820 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, Politekhnicheskaya ul. 29, Saint-Petersburg, 195251, Russia

    V. V. Terleev, V. L. Badenko & I. Yu. Guseva

  2. Leibniz Centre of Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Eberswalder Strasse 84, Muencheberg, 15374, Germany

    W. Mirschel

Authors
  1. V. V. Terleev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. W. Mirschel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. V. L. Badenko
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. I. Yu. Guseva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. V. Terleev.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © V.V. Terleev, W. Mirschel, V.L. Badenko, I.Yu. Guseva, 2017, published in Pochvovedenie, 2017, No. 4, pp. 457–467.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Terleev, V.V., Mirschel, W., Badenko, V.L. et al. An improved Mualem–Van Genuchten method and its verification using data on Beit Netofa clay. Eurasian Soil Sc. 50, 445–455 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229317040135

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229317040135

Keywords

Search

Navigation