Skip to main content
Log in

Organophosphates in agrogray soils with periodic water logging according to the data of 31P NMR spectroscopy

  • Soil Chemistry
  • Published:
Eurasian Soil Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The composition of organic phosphorus compounds was studied using the 31P NMR spectroscopy method in agrogray soils with periodic water logging. The phosphorus content was determined by the specific difference between the hydrological and the redox regimes of these soils. The phosphorus of the organic compounds in the agrogray soils with contrasting water regimes is composed mostly of phosphoric monoesters and diesters, including nucleic and teichoic acids. The relative distribution of the monoesters and inorganic orthophosphates is shown depending on the climate and the soil’s position in the relief. The area of the monoester peaks increases by two times and that of the mineral orthophosphate decreases by six times in the agro-gray soils of Bryansk opolie with an optimal regime of moistening and evaporation in comparison with the agro-gray gleyed soils of Kolomna opolie. As the degree of the soil hydromorphism in the sequence of deeply gleyed soils and gleyic soils increased, the portion of monoesters decreased. Favorable conditions for the microbial activity are formed in soils with a contrasting redox regime, and this is expressed in the accumulation of labile diesters. Inverse relationships were found between the distributions of the mono- and diesters in iron-manganic nodules and in the soils enclosing them; this was caused by the different mechanisms of the stabilization of the stable and labile phosphorus containing compounds. A high percentage of mineral orthophosphate in the nodules allows assuming the presence of chemisorbed orthophosphate ions in organomineral phosphate-metal-humus complexes. The transformation of iron-manganic nodules under the influence of drying demonstrates the more direct participation of microorganisms in the nodules’ formation than the contribution of the physicochemical processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. I. V. Aseeva and O. T. Samko, “Nucleic Acids and the Biomass of Microorganisms in the Zonal Soil Sequence,” Pochvovedenie, No. 5, 84–90 (1984).

  2. V. F. Babanin, L. O. Karpachevskii, V. V. Morozov, and A. M. Shipilin, “Bioaccumulation and Biomineralization of Iron in Soil according to NGRS and Magnetic Measurements,” Gruntoznavstvo, 1(1–2), 23–37 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  3. V. F. Babanin, V. I. Trukhin, L. O. Karpachevskii, et al., Soil Magnetism (Izd. YaGTU, Yaroslavl, 1995) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. V. Dobrovol’skii and T. V. Tereshina, “On the Biological Genesis of Manganic-Iron Concentrations in the Southern Taiga Soils,” Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 17: pochvoved., no. 3, 78–87 (1976).

  5. F. R. Zaidel’man and I. V. Kovalev, “Ecological and Hydrological Assessment of Light Gray Gleyed Soils Drained by Closed and Ditch Drainage,” Pochvovedenie, No. 1, 110–120 (1994).

  6. I. V. Kovalev and N. O. Kovaleva, “Biochemistry of Lignin in Soils of Periodic Excessive Moistening (from the Example of Agrogray Soils in Opolie Landscapes of the Russian Plain),” Pochvovedenie, No. 10, 1205–1216 (2008) [Eur. Soil Sci. 41 (10), 1066–1076 (2008)].

  7. I. V. Kovalev and I. V. Sarycheva, “Iron Compounds in Hydromorphic Gray Forest Soils,” Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 17: pochvoved., no. 2, 30–36 (2007).

  8. N. O. Kovaleva and I. V. Kovalev, “Aromatic Structures of Lignin in the Organic Matter of Gray Forest Soils,” Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser. 17: pochvoved., no. 2, 23–29 (2002).

  9. N. O. Kovaleva, E. V. Terent’eva, and I. V. Kovalev, “Lipid Fraction of Soil Humus as a Source of Paleopedological Information,” Abstr. of the Third All-Russia Conf. “Humic Acids in the Biosphere,” (St. Petersburg, 2005), pp. 64–65 [in Russian].

  10. A. Yu. Kudeyarova, Extended Abstract of Doctoral Dissertation in Biology (Moscow, 1996).

  11. D. S. Orlov, Soil Humus Acids and the General Theory of Humification (Izd. Mosk. Univ., Moscow, 1990), 324 pp. [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  12. N. S. Panikov, L. K. Sadovnikova, and E. V. Fridland, Nonspecific Compounds of Soil Humus (Izd. Mosk. Univ., Moscow, 1984), 144 pp. [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. I. Makarov, “Phosphorous Compounds of Soil Humic Acids,” Pochvovedenie, No. 4, 458–466 (1997) [Eur. Soil Sci. 30 (4), 395–402 (1997)].

  14. M. I. Makarov, Phosphorus in the Organic Matter of Soils (GEOS, Moscow, 2009), 397 pp. [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. D. Fokin, “Radioindication of the Transfer of Iron and Phosphorus in a Heavy Loamy Podzolic Soil,” Pochvovedenie, No. 6, 66–76 (1976).

  16. A. D. Fokin and M. K. Sinkha, “Phosphorus Binding by Soil Humic Substances,” Izv. Timiryazev. Sel’skokhoz. Akad., No. 4, 100–112 (1969).

  17. W. Amelung, Zum Klimaeinfluß auf die organische Substanz nordamerikanischer Prärieböden. Bayreuth, 131 (1997).

  18. G. Anderson, Soil Components. Vol. 1. Organic Components, Ed. by J. E. Gieseking (Springer, Berlin, 1975), pp. 305–331.

    Google Scholar 

  19. C. N. Bedrock, M. V. Cheshire, J. A. Chudek, et al., “Use of 31P NMR to Study the Forms of Phosphorus in Peat Soils,” Sci. Total Environ, 152, 1–8 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. B. J. Cade-Menun, C. W. Liu, R. Nunlist, and J. G. McColl, “Soil and Litter Phosphorus-31 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. Extractants, Metals and Phosphorus Relaxation Times,” J. Environ. Quality 31, 457–465 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. L. M. Codron, K. M. Goh, and R. H. Newman, “Nature and Distribution of Soil Phosphorus as Revealed by a Sequential Extraction Method Followed by 31P Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Analysis,” J. Soil Sci. 36, 199–207 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. L. M. Codron, E. Frossard, H. Tiessen, et al., “Chemical Nature of Organic Phosphorus in Cultivated and Uncultivated Soils under Different Environmental Conditions,” J. Soil Sci. 41, 41–50 (1990).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. L. Celi, S. Lamacchia, F. A. Marsan, and E. Barberis, “Interaction of Inositol Hexaphosphate on Clays: Adsorption and Charging Phenomena,” Soil Sci. 164, 574–585 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. J. Gerke and R. Hermann, “Adsorption of Orthophosphate to Humic-Fe Complexes and to Amorphous Fe-Oxide,” Z. Pflanzenernhr. Bodenk. 155, 233–236 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. G. Guggenberger, L. Haumaier, R. J. Thomas, and W. Zech, “Assessing the Organic Phosphorus Status of an Oxisol under Tropical Pastures Following Native Savanna Using 31P NMR Spectroscopy,” Biol. Fertil. Soils 23, 332–339 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. A. F. Harrisson, Soil Organic Phosphorus. A Review of World Literature (Wallingford, 1987), 257 pp.

  27. G. E. Hawkes, D. Powlson, E. W. Ranndall, and K. R. Tate, “A 31P Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Study of the Phosphorus Species in Alkali Extracts of Soil from Long-Term Field Experiments,” J. Soil Sci. 35, 35–45 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. R. A. Janzen, K. P. Raverkar, P. M. Rutherford, and W. B. McGill, “Decreasing Amounts of Extractable Phospholipid-Linked Fatty Acids in a Soil During Decline in Numbers of Pseudomonads,” Can. J. Soil Sci. 74, 277–284 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  29. I. Kovalev and N. Kovaleva, “Effect of Drainage on the Status and Composition of Fe-Mn-Concretions,” Eurosoil 2004 (Freiburg, Germany, 2004), p. 174–175.

  30. J. Magid, H. Tissen, and L. M. Condron, Humic Substances in Terrestrial Ecosystems, Ed. by A. Piccolo (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1996), pp. 429–466.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. M. I. Makarov, L. Haumaier, and W. Zech, “Nature of Soil Organic Phosphorus: An Assessment of Peak Assignments in the Diester Region of 31P NMR Spectra,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 34, 1467–1447 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. A. L. Miltner, L. Haumaier, and W. Zech, “Transformations of Phosphorus during Incubation of Beech Litter in the Presence of Oxides,” Eur. J. Soil Sci. 49, 471–476 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. R. H. Newman and K. R. Tate, “Soil Phosphorus Characterization by 31P Nuclear Magnetic Resonance,” Commun. Soil. Sci. Plant Anal. 11((9)), 835–842 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. M. Sumann, W. Amelung, L. Haumaier, and W. Zech, “Climatic Effects on Organic Phosphorus in the North American Great Plains Identified by Phosphorus-31 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance,” Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 62, 1580–1586 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. A. Rodionov, “Einfluß von Klima und Nutzung auf Humuseigenschaften Russischer Steppenböden,” Bayreuther Bodenkundliche Berichte 64, 94 pp. (1999).

  36. K. R. Tate and R. H. Newman, “Phosphorus Fractions of a Climosequence of Soils in New Zealand Tussock Grassland,” Soil Biol. Biochem. 14, 191–196 (1982).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. M. A. Wilson, “Applications of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy to the Study of the Structure of Soil Organic Matter,” J. Soil Sci. 32, 167–186 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Original Russian Text © I.V. Kovalev, N.O. Kovaleva, 2011, published in Pochvovedenie, 2011, No. 1, pp. 34–43.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kovalev, I.V., Kovaleva, N.O. Organophosphates in agrogray soils with periodic water logging according to the data of 31P NMR spectroscopy. Eurasian Soil Sc. 44, 29–37 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229311010066

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1064229311010066

Keywords

Navigation