To read this content please select one of the options below:

Judging the quality of internet‐based health information

Sue Childs (Information Society Research Community (I‐SRC), School of Informatics, Engineering and Technology, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK)

Performance Measurement and Metrics

ISSN: 1467-8047

Article publication date: 1 August 2005

2052

Abstract

Purpose

To overview the topic of the quality assessment and quality control of health information on the internet, particularly information targeted at patients, carers and health consumers.

Design/methodology/approach

The context and background of the issue are explained. A range of key quality initiatives is described. The debates on the topic are presented. A health consumer tool produced by the author is described. Items from the literature are used to support the arguments presented.

Findings

A range of quality initiatives exists, but there is neither an internationally agreed set of criteria nor a quality assessment tool. Little evidence exists to demonstrate that the criteria are correlated with good quality web sites and that the quality assessment tools are valid.

Research limitations/implications

Research is needed: to identify the positive or negative effects of the use of health information from the internet on health outcomes: to understand how health consumers use the internet and choose information sources and how this behaviour matches with existing quality initiatives; to explore how criteria correlate with good quality health sites.

Practical implications

This paper is a useful overview of this topic for library and information professionals in both the health and non‐health fields.

Originality/value

This paper raises awareness of this topic with library and information professionals interested in performance measurement. Hopefully it will stimulate research activity on this topic from this professional group.

Keywords

Citation

Childs, S. (2005), "Judging the quality of internet‐based health information", Performance Measurement and Metrics, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 80-96. https://doi.org/10.1108/14678040510607803

Publisher

:

Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2005, Emerald Group Publishing Limited

Related articles