Free volume of an epoxy resin and its relation to structural relaxation: Evidence from positron lifetime and pressure-volume-temperature experiments

Günter Dlubek, E. M. Hassan, Reinhard Krause-Rehberg, and Jürgen Pionteck
Phys. Rev. E 73, 031803 – Published 3 March 2006

Abstract

The microstructure of the free volume and its temperature dependence in the epoxy resin diglycidyl ether of bisphenol-A (DGEBA) have been examined using positron annihilation lifetime spectroscopy (PALS, 80350K, 105Pa) and pressure-volume-temperature (PVT, 293470K, 0.1200MPa) experiments. Employing the Simha-Somcynsky lattice-hole theory (S-S eos), the excess (hole) free volume fraction h and the specific free and occupied volumes, Vf=hV and Vocc=(1h)V, were estimated. From the PALS spectra analyzed with the new routine LT9.0 the hole size distribution, its mean, vh, and mean dispersion, σh, were calculated. vh varies from 35to130Å3. From a comparison of vh with V and Vf, the specific hole number Nh was estimated to be independent of the temperature [Nh(300K)=NhV=0.65nm3]. From comparison with reported dielectric and viscosity measurements, we found that the structural relaxation slows down faster than the shrinkage of the hole free volume Vf would predict on the basis of the free volume theory. Our results indicate that the structural relaxation in DGEBA operates via the free-volume mechanism only when liquidlike clusters of cells of the S-S lattice appear which contain a local free volume of 1.5 or more empty S-S cells. The same conclusion follows from the pressure dependency of the structural relaxation and Vf. It is shown that PALS mirrors thermal volume fluctuations on a subnanometer scale via the dispersion in the ortho-positronium lifetimes. Using a fluctuation approach, the temperature dependency of the characteristic length of dynamic heterogeneity, ξ, is estimated to vary from ξ=1.9nm at Tg to 1.0nm at TTg>1.2. A model was proposed which relates the spatial structure of the free volume as concluded from PALS to the known mobility pattern of the dynamic glass transition at low (cooperative α-relaxation) and high (a-relaxation) temperatures. We discuss possible reasons for the differences between the results of our method and the conclusion from dynamic heat capacity.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
6 More
  • Received 10 October 2005

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.73.031803

©2006 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Günter Dlubek*

  • ITA Institut für Innovative Technologien, Köthen/Halle, Wiesenring 4, D-06120 Lieskau (Halle/S.), Germany

E. M. Hassan and Reinhard Krause-Rehberg

  • Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Fachbereich Physik, D-06099 Halle/S., Germany

Jürgen Pionteck

  • Leibniz-Institut für Polymerforschung Dresden e.V., Hohe Strasse 6, D-01069 Dresden, Germany

  • *Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Electronic address: gdlubek@aol.com

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 73, Iss. 3 — March 2006

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review E

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×