Influence of pressure on fast picosecond relaxation in glass-forming materials

L. Hong, B. Begen, A. Kisliuk, V. N. Novikov, and A. P. Sokolov
Phys. Rev. B 81, 104207 – Published 30 March 2010

Abstract

Understanding the microscopic mechanism of the fast dynamics (gigahertz-terahertz frequency range) in amorphous materials remains a challenge. Disordered systems usually exhibit two additional contributions in this frequency range in comparison to their crystalline counterparts: a low-frequency excess vibrations, the so-called boson peak, and the fast picosecond relaxation that appears as a quasielastic scattering (QES) in the light- and neutron-scattering spectra. The nature of both contributions remains a subject of active discussions. In particular, QES intensity varies significantly with temperature. These variations might be caused by pure thermal effect and/or by change in density. To separate these two contributions we performed detailed light (Raman and Brillouin) scattering studies of the fast dynamics at different experimental conditions: isothermal, isobaric, isokinetic, and isochoric. The analysis demonstrates that the volume contribution dominates the fast relaxation behavior in a liquid state while the thermal energy becomes more important in the glassy state. Moreover, the presented analysis of the light-scattering data reveals significant difference in sensitivity of the fast dynamics to pressure among seven glass-forming materials (van der Waals-bonding and hydrogen-bonding molecular systems and polymers) studied in this work. It appears that the fast dynamics in orthoterphenyl and glycerol depends on pressure (density) significantly weaker than in other materials. However, the earlier observed correlations between pressure-induced variations in the QES and boson peak intensities and between the boson peak frequency and intensity are confirmed for all the studied materials. The obtained experimental results are compared to predictions of different models.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
5 More
  • Received 10 December 2009

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.81.104207

©2010 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

L. Hong1, B. Begen1, A. Kisliuk2,3, V. N. Novikov2,3,4, and A. P. Sokolov2,3,*

  • 1Department of Polymer Science, The University of Akron, Akron, Ohio 44325-3909, USA
  • 2Chemical Science Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-6197, USA
  • 3Department of Chemistry, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee 37996, USA
  • 4Institute of Automation and Electrometry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk 630090, Russia

  • *Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; sokolov@utk.edu

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 81, Iss. 10 — 1 March 2010

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×