Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
ArticlesMeasuring Outcomes of Care for Adolescents With Emotional and Behavioral Problems
Section snippets
Sample
Adolescents 11 through 18 years of age were recruited at intake from two inpatient and two outpatient mental health programs. Adolescents who were not mentally retarded (IQ > 70 as judged by the intake clinician) or psychotic were eligible to participate. Adolescents were ineligible if a parent or guardian who had regular contact with the adolescent during the prior 6 months was not available. At intake, clinicians asked parents for permission for research assistants to contact them. Each
Sample Characteristics
Of the 67 adolescents enrolled in the study, 40% were female; mean age was 13.9 (SD = 1.9). Twenty-eight percent were African American, 60% were white, 6% were Hispanic, and 6% were of other racial backgrounds. Medicaid paid for the care of 34%, 41% were covered by private insurance, 12% had no coverage, and 13% were covered under Title XX. Sixty-one percent were inpatients and 39% were outpatients. The median yearly family income for families participating in this study was $13,160, an amount
DISCUSSION
The prototype ATOM is a reasonably reliable and valid measure with modest sensitivity to change and low respondent burden. The ATOM measures multiple domains of outcomes by using complementary, brief scales that are internally consistent, stable over 7 days, and in general agreement with longer instruments. Compared with previously validated instruments, ATOM outcome measures show change in the expected direction over 6 months. In their prototype form, the parent and adolescent instruments took
REFERENCES (22)
- et al.
Data-gathering tools for “real world” clinical settings: a multisite feasibility study
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
(1996) - et al.
Assessment of client/ patient satisfaction: development of a general scale
Eval Program Plann
(1979) - et al.
Teacher ratings of DSM-III-R symptoms for the disruptive behavior disorders
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
(1992) - et al.
Toward a level playing field: predictive factors for the outcomes of mental health treatment for adolescents
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
(2000) - et al.
Burden Assessment Scale for families of the seriously mentally ill
Eval Program Plann
(1994) - et al.
Criterion validity of the NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children, Version 2.3 (DISC-2.3)
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
(1996) - et al.
The NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children Version 2.3 (DISC-2.3): description, acceptability, prevalence rates, and performance in the MECA study
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
(1996) Manual for the Child Behavior Checklist 14–18 and 1991 Profile
(1991)Manual for the Youth Self-Report and 1991 Profile
(1991)- et al.
Developmental epidemiology
Epidemiol Rev
(1995)
Kids Count Data Book: State Profiles of Child Well-Being
Cited by (9)
Determinates of youth and parent satisfaction in usual care psychotherapy
2007, Evaluation and Program PlanningDetection and outcomes of substance use disorders in adolescents seeking mental health treatment
2003, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent PsychiatryThe adolescent treatment outcomes module (ATOM)
2014, The Use of Psychological Testing for Treatment Planning and Outcomes Assessment: Volume 2: Instruments for Children and AdolescentsImproving community-based mental health care for children: Translating knowledge into action
2013, Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services ResearchQuality of mental health care for depressed adolescents
2008, American Journal of Medical QualityClinician perspectives of diagnosis and perceived client change in "real world" psychotherapy for youth emotional and behavioral disorders
2007, Journal of Child and Family Studies
This work was funded in part by NIMH grant R01 MH 57882 . The authors acknowledge the work of Connie Venhaus, who coordinated this study; Shelly Y. Lensing, who conducted the statistical analysis; and Emily Harris, who read an initial draft of the paper.