Scientific Papers
Global Assessment of Child Psychopathology

https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-198703000-00014Get rights and content

Abstract

The Children's Global Assessment Scale (CGAS) was analyzed wih regard to interrater reliability, discriminant validity, and clinical usefulness in two different studies. Where interrater reliability and discriminant validity were high, stability varied for different psychiatric diagnoses. In a clinical sample, scores were dependent on diagnoses, mental retardation, and socioeconomic status. A cutoff score of 70 clearly differentiated normal functioning from more severe problems in need of treatment. The scale sensibly reflected change due to therapeutic interventions.

References (6)

  • T.M. Achenbach

    The child behavior profile: an empirically based system for assessing children's behavioral problem and competencies

    Int. J. Ment. Hlth.

    (1979)
  • Conners, C. K. (1973), Rating scales for use in drug studies with children. Psychopharm. Bull., Special issue, pp....
  • J. Endicott et al.

    The global assessment scale. A procedure for measuring overall severity of psychiatric disturbance

    Arch. Gen. Psychiatr.

    (1976)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (51)

  • Predictors of longitudinal psychosocial functioning in bipolar youth transitioning to adults

    2019, Journal of Affective Disorders
    Citation Excerpt :

    To examine functional impairment in those who have symptomatic remissions, we limited our analyses to those in Class 1 Predominantly Euthymic and Class 3 Ill with Improving Course). We further selected those participants in these Classes who reported psychosocial fair/poor functioning operationalized as C-GAS/GAF < 70 (Jones et al., 1995; Shaffer et al., 1983; Steinhausen, 1987). Given that this symptomatic remission did not occur until the later years of follow-up for Class 3 Ill with Improving Course, we focused on the most recent follow-up, as this was a proxy for the current functioning status, when both Classes were in remission.

  • Psychological interventions for adolescent psychosis: A pilot controlled trial in routine care

    2013, European Psychiatry
    Citation Excerpt :

    Total scores range from 16 to 112. This scale is widely used to rate psychosocial functioning in child and adolescent mental health research and has good psychometric properties [15]. A single global clinician rating from 1 (very poor) to 100 (no problem) is made based on emotional and behavioural difficulties, usually over the previous 3-month period.

  • Reliability of the GAF and CGAS with children exposed to trauma

    2007, Child Abuse and Neglect
    Citation Excerpt :

    Studies of the reliability of these measures have yielded mixed results. Estimates of interrater reliability of the CGAS have ranged from .53 to .93 (Dyrborg et al., 2000; Green, Shirk, Hanze, & Wanstrath, 1994; Rey, Starling, Wever, Dossetor, & Plapp, 1995; Shaffer et al., 1983; Steinhausen, 1987). Likewise, studies of the interrater reliability of the GAF for children and adolescents yielded coefficients ranging from .54 to .92 (Beitchman et al., 2001; Gold, Sherra, & Clarkson, 1993; Manassis & Hood, 1998; Rey et al., 1995; Smith, Thienemann, & Steiner, 1992).

View all citing articles on Scopus

This article is based on papers presented at the VII Congress of the European Society of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Lausanne, Switzerland, July 4-8, 1983 and the 31st Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, Toronto, October 9-14, 1984.

View full text