Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Scientific PapersGlobal Assessment of Child Psychopathology
References (6)
The child behavior profile: an empirically based system for assessing children's behavioral problem and competencies
Int. J. Ment. Hlth.
(1979)- Conners, C. K. (1973), Rating scales for use in drug studies with children. Psychopharm. Bull., Special issue, pp....
- et al.
The global assessment scale. A procedure for measuring overall severity of psychiatric disturbance
Arch. Gen. Psychiatr.
(1976)
Cited by (51)
Predictors of longitudinal psychosocial functioning in bipolar youth transitioning to adults
2019, Journal of Affective DisordersCitation Excerpt :To examine functional impairment in those who have symptomatic remissions, we limited our analyses to those in Class 1 Predominantly Euthymic and Class 3 Ill with Improving Course). We further selected those participants in these Classes who reported psychosocial fair/poor functioning operationalized as C-GAS/GAF < 70 (Jones et al., 1995; Shaffer et al., 1983; Steinhausen, 1987). Given that this symptomatic remission did not occur until the later years of follow-up for Class 3 Ill with Improving Course, we focused on the most recent follow-up, as this was a proxy for the current functioning status, when both Classes were in remission.
Psychological interventions for adolescent psychosis: A pilot controlled trial in routine care
2013, European PsychiatryCitation Excerpt :Total scores range from 16 to 112. This scale is widely used to rate psychosocial functioning in child and adolescent mental health research and has good psychometric properties [15]. A single global clinician rating from 1 (very poor) to 100 (no problem) is made based on emotional and behavioural difficulties, usually over the previous 3-month period.
Differential effects of psychological maltreatment on children of mothers exposed to intimate partner violence
2011, Child Abuse and NeglectReliability of the GAF and CGAS with children exposed to trauma
2007, Child Abuse and NeglectCitation Excerpt :Studies of the reliability of these measures have yielded mixed results. Estimates of interrater reliability of the CGAS have ranged from .53 to .93 (Dyrborg et al., 2000; Green, Shirk, Hanze, & Wanstrath, 1994; Rey, Starling, Wever, Dossetor, & Plapp, 1995; Shaffer et al., 1983; Steinhausen, 1987). Likewise, studies of the interrater reliability of the GAF for children and adolescents yielded coefficients ranging from .54 to .92 (Beitchman et al., 2001; Gold, Sherra, & Clarkson, 1993; Manassis & Hood, 1998; Rey et al., 1995; Smith, Thienemann, & Steiner, 1992).
This article is based on papers presented at the VII Congress of the European Society of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Lausanne, Switzerland, July 4-8, 1983 and the 31st Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, Toronto, October 9-14, 1984.