Register      Login
Animal Production Science Animal Production Science Society
Food, fibre and pharmaceuticals from animals
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Investigating the interaction between body condition at calving and pre-calving energy and protein nutrition on the early lactation performance of dairy cows

C. R. Stockdale
+ Author Affiliations
- Author Affiliations

Primary Industries Research Victoria (PIRVic), Department of Primary Industries, Kyabram Centre, 120 Cooma Road, Kyabram, Vic. 3620, Australia. Email: richard.stockdale@dpi.vic.gov.au

Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45(12) 1507-1518 https://doi.org/10.1071/EA04104
Submitted: 21 May 2004  Accepted: 23 December 2004   Published: 19 January 2006

Abstract

The experiment was an investigation into the interaction between body condition at calving and the provision of additional dietary energy or protein to a total mixed ration (TMR) in late gestation on milk production and indices of reproductive performance. Seventy-two Holstein–Friesian multiparous cows (12 per treatment) were fed to achieve target body condition scores (BCS) of either 4 (3.5–4.5) or 6 (5.5–6.5) units by 1 month before they calved (July). They were individually fed 1 of 3 diets during the last 26 (s.d. ± 7.4) days before calving date (mean of 19 August; s.d. ± 9.7). The 3 diets were (1) a TMR containing maize silage, barley grain, canola meal and hay, fed at 1.5% of liveweight (control diet), (2) the TMR plus 3.5 kg DM of wheat-based pellets (energy diet), and (3) the TMR plus 3.1 kg DM of soyabean meal (protein diet). Cows grazed highly digestible pasture after calving at pasture allowances of about 35 kg DM/cow.day, and were supplemented with 6 kg DM of cereal grain-based pellets per day. Cows were fed this diet for an average of about 10 weeks, from calving until the start of mating at the end of October.

The provision of additional dietary energy and protein before calving did not affect post-partum production, and there were no interactions with body condition. On average, the BCS 6 cows were 111 kg heavier (P<0.05), and were 1.8 units of body condition higher (P<0.05), than the BCS 4 cows. The thin cows maintained body condition during the month before parturition while the fat cows lost condition. The cows offered additional protein improved their body condition (+0.07 units) during this time, while the cows in the other 2 dietary treatments lost condition (–0.10 units). Average daily rumen fluid pH was lowest in the cows fed the additional energy. Blood urea and rumen fluid ammonia concentrations were increased markedly by feeding the protein diet. In comparison with cows offered the control and energy diets, the cows offered additional protein had the highest (P<0.05) urine pH levels (6.24 v. 5.64 and 5.59 for the protein, control and energy diets, respectively), the lowest (P<0.05) blood serum concentrations of calcium at calving (1.74 v. 2.06 and 1.99 mmol/L for the protein, control and energy diets, respectively), and tended to have more milk fever and retained foetal membranes. Regression analysis indicated that the response to improving BCS at calving was 1.1 kg milk per additional BCS at calving (P<0.05), and the fatter cows produced milk with a higher (P<0.05) milk fat concentration (3.46 v. 3.07%) than the thinner cows. There was no effect (P>0.05) of treatment on days to first ovulation or in-calf rates although only about 80% of cows conceived during the 12-week mating period.

Additional keywords: blood metabolites, changes in body condition, indicators of reproductive performance, milk fat and protein concentrations, milk production.


Acknowledgments

Technical assistance to the project team was provided by Stuart Austin, Pam Guerra, Chris Spokes and Yvette Williams. Three students from Dookie College, the University of Melbourne, Rob Deery, Shane Manks and Tim Calder, undertook projects in the experiment to complete their courses, and Tracy Moyes used the experiment as a key component of her PhD studies with Professor Jock Macmillan, through the University of Melbourne. Financial assistance was provided by the Department of Primary Industries and Dairy Australia, through Murray Dairy and WestVic Dairy.


References


(1992) Technical committee on the responses to nutrients. Report 9. Nutritive requirements for ruminant animals: protein. Nutrition Abstracts and Reviews, Series B: Livestock feed and feeding 62, 787–835. open url image1

Agenäs S, Burstedt E, Holtenius K (2003) Effects of feeding intensity during the dry period. 1. Feed intake, body weight, and milk production. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 870–882.
PubMed |
open url image1

Andersen JB, Sehested J, Ingvartsen KL (1999) Effect of dry cow feeding strategy on rumen pH, concentration of volatile fatty acids and rumen epithelium development. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica. Section A: Animal Science 49, 149–155.
Crossref |
open url image1

Baird DB (1994) The design of experiments with covariates. PhD thesis, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

Beam SW, Butler WR (1999) Effects of energy balance on follicular development and first ovulation in postpartum dairy cows. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility 54(suppl.), 411–424.
PubMed |
open url image1

Bell AW (1995) Regulation of organic nutrient metabolism during transition from late pregnancy to early lactation. Journal of Animal Science 73, 2804–2819.
PubMed |
open url image1

Bell AW, Slepetis R, Ehrhardt RA (1995) Growth and accretion of energy and protein in the gravid uterus during late pregnancy in Holstein cows. Journal of Dairy Science 78, 1954–1961.
PubMed |
open url image1

Broster WH, Broster VJ (1998) Body score of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Research 65, 155–173.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Buckley F, O’Sullivan K, Mee JF, Evans RD, Dillon P (2003) Relationships among milk yield, body condition, cow weight, and reproduction in spring-calved Holstein–Friesians. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 2308–2319.
PubMed |
open url image1

Butler ST, Murphy JJ, Stakelum GK, O’Mara FP, Rath M (2002) Influence of transition diets on the performance and metabolic profile of dairy cows both pre- and post-calving. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research 41, 71–85. open url image1

Clarke T, Flinn PC, McGowan AA (1982) Low cost pepsin–cellulase assays for prediction of digestibility of herbage. Grass and Forage Science 37, 147–150. open url image1

Dewhurst RJ, Moorby JM, Dhanoa MS, Evans RT, Fisher WJ (2000) Effects of altering energy and protein supply to dairy cows during the dry period. 1. Intake, body condition, and milk production. Journal of Dairy Science 83, 1782–1794.
PubMed |
open url image1

Dirksen GU, Dor S, Arbel A, Schwarz M, Liebich H-G (1997) The rumen mucosa — its importance as a metabolic organ of the high producing dairy cow. Israel Journal of Veterinary Medicine 52, 73–79. open url image1

Dirksen GU, Liebich HG, Mayer E (1985) Adaptive changes of the ruminal mucosa and their functional and clinical significance. Bovine Practitioner 20, 116–120. open url image1

Doepel L, Lapierre H, Kennelly JJ (2002) Peripartum performance and metabolism of dairy cows in response to prepartum energy and protein intake. Journal of Dairy Science 85, 2315–2334.
PubMed |
open url image1

Dorshorst ME, Grummer RR (2002) Effects of day relative to parturition and dietary crude protein on rumen fermentation in prepartum transition cows. Journal of Dairy Science 85, 2290–2298.
PubMed |
open url image1

Earle DF (1976) A guide to scoring dairy cow condition. Journal of Agriculture (Victoria) 74, 228–231. open url image1

Earle DF, McGowan AA (1979) Evaluation and calibration of a rising plate meter for estimating pasture dry matter yield. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 19, 337–343.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Gary LA, Sherritt GW, Hale EB (1970) Behaviour of Charolais cattle on pasture. Journal of Animal Science 30, 203–206. open url image1

Gillund P, Reksen O, Gröhn YT, Karlberg K (2001) Body condition related to ketosis and reproductive performance in Norwegian dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 84, 1390–1396.
PubMed |
open url image1

Hayirli A, Grummer RR, Nordheim EV, Crump PM (2003) Models for predicting dry matter intake of Holsteins during the prefresh transition period. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 1771–1779.
PubMed |
open url image1

Hernandez-Urdaneta A, Coppock CE, McDowell RE, Gianola D, Smith NE (1976) Changes in forage-concentrate ratio of complete feeds for dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 59, 695–707. open url image1

Holcomb CS, Van Horn HH, Head HH, Hall MB, Wilcox CJ (2001) Effects of prepartum dry matter intake and forage percentage on postpartum performance of lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 84, 2051–2058.
PubMed |
open url image1

Huyler MT, Kincaid RL, Dostal DF (1999) Metabolic and yield responses of multiparous Holstein cows to prepartum rumen-undegradable protein. Journal of Dairy Science 82, 527–536.
PubMed |
open url image1

Ingvartsen KL, Andersen JB (2000) Integration of metabolism and intake regulation: a review focusing on periparturient animals. Journal of Dairy Science 83, 1573–1597.
PubMed |
open url image1

Keady TWJ, Mayne CS, Fitzpatrick DA, McCoy MA (2001) Effect of concentrate feed level in late gestation on subsequent milk yield, milk composition, and fertility of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 84, 1468–1479.
PubMed |
open url image1

King KR, Stockdale CR (1981) Milk yield of dairy cows given restricted access to water in a Mediterranean-type climate. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 21, 167–171.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Kokkonen T, Tesfa A, Tuori M, Syrjälä-Qvist L (2004) Concentrate feeding strategy of dairy cows during transition period. Livestock Production Science 86, 239–251.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Lobley GE , Milano GD , Van der Walt JG (2000) The liver: integrator of nitrogen metabolism. In ‘Ruminant physiology: digestion, metabolism, growth, and reproduction’. (Ed. PB Cronjé) pp. 149–168. (CAB International: Wallingford, UK)

McNamara S, O’Mara FP, Rath M, Murphy JJ (2003) Effects of different transition diets on dry matter intake, milk production, and milk composition in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 2397–2408.
PubMed |
open url image1

McNeill DM , Slepetis R , Smith DM , Ehrhardt RA , Bell AW (1994) Protein requirements in late pregnancy: partitioning of nitrogen between gravid uterus and maternal tissues. In ‘Proceedings of the Cornell nutrition conference for feed manufacturers’. pp. 117–123. (New York State College of Agriculture and Life Sciences: Ithaca, NY)

Moorby JM, Dewhurst RJ, Evans RT, Fisher WJ (2002) Effects of varying the energy and protein supply to dry cows on high-forage systems. Livestock Production Science 76, 125–136. open url image1

Moorby JM, Dewhurst RJ, Marsden S (1996) Effect of increasing digestible undegradable protein supply to dairy cows in late gestation on the yield and composition of milk during the subsequent lactation. Animal Science (Penicuik, Scotland) 63, 201–213. open url image1

Ørskov ER, McDonald I (1979) The estimation of protein degradability in the rumen from incubation measurements weighted according to rate of passage. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 92, 499–503. open url image1

Ørskov ER, Mehrez AZ (1977) Estimation of extent of protein degradation from basal feeds in the rumen of sheep. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 36, 78A.
PubMed |
open url image1

Park AF, Shirley JE, Titgemeyer EC, Meyer MJ, VanBaale MJ, VandeHaar MJ (2002) Effect of protein level in prepartum diets on metabolism and performance of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 85, 1815–1828. open url image1

Phillips GJ, Citron TL, Sage JS, Cummins KA, Cecava MJ, McNamara JP (2003) Adaptations in body muscle and fat in transition dairy cattle fed differing amounts of protein and methionine hydroxy analog. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 3634–3647. open url image1

Pryce JE, Coffey MP, Simm G (2001) The relationship between body condition score and reproductive performance. Journal of Dairy Science 84, 1508–1515. open url image1

Pryce JE, Royal MD, Garnsworthy PC, Mao IL (2004) Fertility in the high-producing dairy cow. Livestock Production Science 86, 125–135.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Putnam DE, Varga GA, Green MH (1999) Glucose kinetic responses to protein supplementation and exogenous somatotropin in late gestation dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 82, 1274–1281.
PubMed |
open url image1

Rabelo E, Rezende RL, Bertics SJ, Grummer RR (2003) Effects of transition diets varying in dietary energy density on lactation performance and ruminal parameters of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 86, 916–925.
PubMed |
open url image1

Robinson PH, Moorby JM, Arana M, Graham T (2004) Effect of feeding a high- or a low-rumen escape protein supplement to dry Holstein cows and heifers within 3 weeks of calving on their productive and reproductive performance in the subsequent lactation. Animal Feed Science and Technology 114, 43–57. open url image1

Roche JR (2003) Energy nutrition of the pasture-based transition cow — a review. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 97(suppl.) , 57–63. open url image1

Roche JF, Mackey D, Diskin MD (2000) Reproductive management of postpartum cows. Animal Reproduction Science 60–61, 703–712.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | PubMed | open url image1

Ryan G, Murphy JJ, Crosse S, Rath M (2003) The effect of pre-calving diet on post-calving cow performance. Livestock Production Science 79, 61–71.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Sakata T, Tamate H (1978) Rumen epithelium cell proliferation accelerated by rapid increase in intraruminal butyrate. Journal of Dairy Science 61, 1109–1113.
PubMed |
open url image1

Sakata T, Tamate H (1979) Rumen epithelium cell proliferation accelerated by propionate and acetate. Journal of Dairy Science 62, 49–52.
PubMed |
open url image1

Simm G , Oldham JD , Coffey MP (2001) Dairy cows in the future. In ‘Fertility in the high producing dairy cow. Vol. 1’. (Ed. MG Diskin) pp. 1–18. (British Society of Animal Science: Edinburgh)

Standing Committee on Agriculture (1990) ‘Feeding standards for Australian livestock. Ruminants.’ (CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne)

Stockdale CR (1984) Evaluation of techniques for estimating the yield of irrigated pastures intensively grazed by dairy cows. 2. The rising plate meter. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry 24, 305–311.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Stockdale CR (2004a) Effects of level of feeding of concentrates during early lactation on the yield and composition of milk from grazing dairy cows with varying body condition score at calving. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44, 1–9.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Stockdale CR (2004b) Effects of feeding magnesium sulfate to dry pregnant dairy cows with different body condition scores on intake in late gestation, periparturient blood calcium concentrations and production in early lactation. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 44, 539–546.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Stockdale CR, King KR (1983) A comparison of two techniques used to estimate the herbage intake of lactating dairy cows in a grazing experiment. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 100, 227–230. open url image1

Stockdale CR, Roche JR (2002) A review of the energy and protein nutrition of dairy cows through their dry period and its impact on early lactation performance. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 53, 737–753.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1

Tilley JMA, Terry RA (1963) A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops. Journal of the British Grassland Society 18, 104–111. open url image1

Tucker WB , Hogue JF , Waterman DF , Swenson TS , Xin Z , Hemken RW , Jackson JA , Adams GD , Spicer LJ (1992) Sulfur should be included when calculating the dietary cation-anion balance of diets for lactating dairy cows. In ‘Animal science research report’. pp. 141–150. (Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station: Oklahoma)

VandeHaar MJ, Yousif G, Sharma BK, Herdt TH, Emery RS, Allen MS, Liesman JS (1999) Effect of energy and protein density of prepartum diets on fat and protein metabolism of dairy cattle in the periparturient period. Journal of Dairy Science 82, 1282–1295.
PubMed |
open url image1

Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA (1991) Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583–3597.
PubMed |
open url image1

Wales WJ, Dellow DW, Doyle PT (1999) Degradabilities of dry matter and crude protein from perennial herbage and supplements used in dairy production systems in Victoria. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 39, 645–656.
Crossref | GoogleScholarGoogle Scholar | open url image1