Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Applicability of site-specific pedotransfer functions and rosetta model for the estimation of dynamic soil hydraulic properties under different vegetation covers

  • Research Article
  • Soils, Section 3: Remediation and Management of Contaminated or Degraded Lands
  • Published:
Journal of Soils and Sediments Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background, Aims, and Scope

During the last decades, different methods have been developed to determine soil hydraulic properties in the field and laboratory. These methodologies are frequently time-consuming and/or expensive. An indirect method, named Pedotransfer Functions (PTFs), was developed to predict soil hydraulic properties using other easily measurable soil (physical and chemical) parameters. This work evaluates the use of the PTFs included in the Rosetta model (Schaap et al. 2001) and compares them with PTFs obtained specifically for soils under two different vegetation covers.

Methods

Rosetta software includes two basic types of pedotransfer functions (Class PTF and Continuous PTF), allowing the estimation of van Genuchten water retention parameters using limited (textural classes only) or more extensive (texture, bulk density and one or two water retention measurements) input data. We obtained water retention curves from undisturbed samples using the ‘sand box’ method for potentials between saturation and 20 kPa, and the pressure membrane method for potentials between 100 and 1500 kPa. Physical properties of sampled soils were used as input variables for the Rosetta model and to determine site-specific PTFs.

Results

The Rosetta model accurately predicts water content at field capacity, but clearly underestimates it at saturation. Poor agreement between observed and estimated values in terms of root mean square error were obtained for the Rosetta model in comparison with specific PTFs. Discrepancies between both methods are comparable to results obtained by other authors.

Conclusions

Site-specific PTFs predicted the van Genuchten parameters better than Rosetta model. Pedotransfers functions have been a useful tool to solve the water retention capacity for soils located in the southern Pyrenees, where the fine particle size and organic matter content are higher. The Rosetta model showed good predictions for the curve parameters, even though the uncertainty of the data predicted was higher than for the site-specific PTFs.

Recommendations and Perspectives

The Rosetta model accurately predicts the retention curve parameters when the use is related with wide soil types; nevertheless, if we want to obtain good predictors using a homogenous soil database, specific PTFs are required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arya LM, Paris JF (1981): A physicoempirical model to predict the soil moisture characteristic from particle-size distribution and bulk density data. Soil Science Society of America Journal 45, 1023–1030

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball DF (1964): Loss-on-ignition as an estimate of organic matter and organic carbon in non-calcareus soils. Journal of Soils Science 15, 84–92

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beven KJ, Kirkby MJ (1979): A physically-based variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrological Sciences Bulletin 24, 43–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloemen GW (1980): Calculation of hydraulic conductivities from texture and organic matter content. Z Pflanzenernähr Bodenkd 143, 581–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouma J (1989): Using soil survey data for quantitative land evaluation. Advances of Soil Science 9, 177–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Buttle JM, House DA (1997): Spatial variability of saturated hydraulic conductivity in shallow macroporus soils in a forested basin. Journal of Hydrology 203, 127–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day PR (1965): Particle fractionation and particle-size analysis. In: Black CA et al. (eds), Methods of soil analysis, Part I. Agronomy 9, 545–567

  • Gallart F, Llorens P, Latron J, Regüés D (2002): Hydrological processes and their seasonal controls in a small Mediterranean mountain catchment in the Pyrenees. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 6, 527–537

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee GW, Bauder JW (1986): Particle size analysis. In: Klute A (ed), Methods of soil Analysis, Part I, Monograph 15. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, 383–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta SC, Larson WE (1979): Estimating soil water characteristic from particle size distribution, organic matter percent, and bulk density. Water Resources Research 15, 1633–1635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamblin A (1991): Sustainable agricultural systems, what are the appropriate measures for soil structure? Australian Journal of Soil Research 29, 709–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación (1986): Métodos Oficiales de Análisis. Vol. III. Secretaría General Técnica M.A.P.A., Madrid, 532 pp

  • McKeague JA (ed) (1978): Manual on soil sampling and methods of analysis. Canadian Society of Soil Science (CSSC), Ottawa, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Minasny B, McBratney AB, Bristow K (1999): Comparison of different approaches to the development of pedotransfer functions for water retention curves. Geoderma 93, 225–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pachepsky YaA, Timlin D, Varallyay G (1996): Artificial neural networks to estimate soil water retention from easy measurable data. Soil Science Society America Journal 60, 727–733

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pachepsky YaA, Rawls WJ, Timlin D (1999): The current status of pedotransfer functions: their accuracy, reliability and utility in field-and regional-scale modeling. In: Corwin DL, Loague K, Ellswoth TR (eds), Assessment of Non-point Source Pollution in the Vadose Zone. Geophysical Monograph 108. American Geophysical Union, Washington, pp 223–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Poyatos R, Latron J, Llorens P (2003): Land-use and land-cover change after agricultural abandonment. The case of a Mediterranean mountain area (Catalan Pre-Pyrenees). Mountain Research Development 23, 52–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls WJ, Brakensiek DL, Saxton KE (1982): Estimation of soil water properties. Transactions of the ASAE 25, 1316–1320

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls WJ, Brakensiek DL, Soni B (1983): Agricultural management effects on soil water processes, Part I. Soil water retention and Green-Ampt parameters. Transactions of the ASAE 26, 1747–1752

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls WJ, Pachepsky YA, Ritchie JC, Sobecki TM, Bloodworth H (2003): Effect of soil carbon on soil water retention. Geoderma 116, 61–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds SG (1970): The gravimetric method of soil moisture determination. Part I. A study of equipment and methodological problems. Journal of Hydrology 11, 258–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romano N, Palladino M (2002): Prediction of soil water retention using soil physical data and terrain attributes. Journal of Hydrology 265, 56–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubio C, Llorens P (2004): Comparing different pedotransfer functions for silty loam soils in a Mediterranean mountain catchment. European Cooperation Field Scientific Technical Research, pp 273–278

  • Rubio C (2005): Hidrodinámica de los suelos de un área de montaña media mediterránea sometida a cambios de uso y cubierta. PhD Tesis, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 195 pp

  • Rubio CM, Llorens P, Gallart F (2008): Uncertainty and efficiency of pedotransfer functions for estimating water retention characteristics of soils. European Journal Soil Science 59, 339–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaap MG, Leij FJ (1998): Database related accuracy and uncertainty of pedotransfer functions. Soil Science 163, 765–779

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schaap MG, Leij FJ (2000): Improved prediction of unsaturated hydraulic conductivity with the Mualem-van Genuchten model. Soil Science Society America Journal 64, 843–851

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schaap MG, Leij FJ, Van Genuchten MTh (1998): Neural network analysis for hierarchical prediction of soil water retention and saturated hydraulic conductivity. Soil Science Society America Journal 62, 847–855

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schaap MG, Leij FJ, Van Genuchten MTh (2001): ROSETTA: a computer program for estimating soil hydraulic parameters with hierarchical pedotransfer functions. Journal of Hydrology 251, 163–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonneveld MPW, Backx MAHM, Bouma J (2003): Simulation of soil water regimes including Pedotransfer functions and land-use related preferential flow. Geoderma 112, 97–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tietje O, Tapkenhinrichs M (1993): Evaluation of Pedotransfer functions. Soil Science Society America Journal 57, 1088–1095

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Genuchten MTh (1980): A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal 44, 892–898

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Genuchten MTh, Leij FJ, Yates SR (1991): The RETC code for quantifying the hydraulic functions of unsaturated soils. EPA/600/2-91/065. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Ada, OH, USA, 85 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Wösten JHM, Schuren CHJE, Bouma J, Stein A (1990): Use of practical aspects of soil behavior to evaluate different methods of generate soil hydraulic functions. Hydrological Processes 4, 299–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wösten JHM, Lilly A, Nemes A, Le Bas C (1990): Development and use of a database of hydraulic properties of European soils. Geoderma 90, 169–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wösten JHM, Pachepsky YA, Rawls WJ (2001): Pedotransfer functions: bridging the gap between available basic soil data and missing soil hydraulic characteristics. Journal of Hydrology 251, 123–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Agronomy and Food Engineering and Biotechnology, Technical University of Catalonia, Castelldefels, Spain

    Carles M. Rubio

  2. Lab-Ferrer Soils and Environmental Consulting Center, Ferran El Catolic 3, 25200, Cervera, Spain

    Carles M. Rubio

Authors
  1. Carles M. Rubio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carles M. Rubio.

Additional information

ESS-Submission Editor: Prof. Zhihong Xu, PhD (zhihong.xu@griffith.edu.au)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rubio, C.M. Applicability of site-specific pedotransfer functions and rosetta model for the estimation of dynamic soil hydraulic properties under different vegetation covers. J Soils Sediments 8, 137–145 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1065/jss2008.03.281

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1065/jss2008.03.281

Keywords

Search

Navigation