Skip to main content
Log in

Phytoextraction of lead-contaminated soil using vetivergrass (Vetiveria zizanioides L.), cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica L.) and carabaograss (Paspalum conjugatum L.)

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research - International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background, Aims and Scope

The global problem concerning contamination of the environment as a consequence of human activities is increasing. Most of the environmental contaminants are chemical by-products and heavy metals such as lead (Pb). Lead released into the environment makes its way into the air, soil and water. Lead contributes to a variety of health effects such as decline in mental, cognitive and physical health of the individual. An alternative way of reducing Pb concentration from the soil is through phytoremediation. Phytoremediation is an alternative method that uses plants to clean up a contaminated area. The objectives of this study were: (1) to determine the survival rate and vegetative characteristics of three grass species such as vetivergrass, cogongrass and carabaograss grown in soils with different Pb levels; and (2) to determine and compare the ability of the three grass species as potential phytoremediators in terms of Pb accumulation by plants.

Methods

The three test plants: vetivergrass (Vetiveria zizanioides L.); cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica L.); and carabaograss (Paspalum conjugatum L.) were grown in individual plastic bags containing soils with 75 mg kg−1 (37.5 kg ha−1) and 150 mg kg−1 (75 kg ha−1) of Pb, respectively. The Pb contents of the test plants and the soil were analyzed before and after experimental treatments using an atomic absorption spectrophotometer. This study was laid out following a 3 × 2 factorial experiment in a completely randomized design.

Results

On the vegetative characteristics of the test plants, vetivergrass registered the highest whole plant dry matter weight (33.85–39.39 Mg ha−1). Carabaograss had the lowest herbage mass production of 4.12 Mg ha−1 and 5.72 Mg ha−1 from soils added with 75 and 150 mg Pb kg−1, respectively. Vetivergrass also had the highest percent plant survival which meant it best tolerated the Pb contamination in soils. Vetivergrass registered the highest rate of Pb absorption (10.16 ± 2.81 mg kg−1). This was followed by cogongrass (2.34 ± 0.52 mg kg−1) and carabaograss with a mean Pb level of 0.49 ± 0.56 mg kg−1. Levels of Pb among the three grasses (shoots + roots) did not vary significantly with the amount of Pb added (75 and 150 mg kg−1) to the soil.

Discussion

Vetivergrass yielded the highest biomass; it also has the greatest amount of Pb absorbed (roots + shoots). This can be attributed to the highly extensive root system of vetivergrass with the presence of an enormous amount of root hairs. Extensive root system denotes more contact to nutrients in soils, therefore more likelihood of nutrient absorption and Pb uptake. The efficiency of plants as phytoremediators could be correlated with the plants’ total biomass. This implies that the higher the biomass, the greater the Pb uptake. Plants characteristically exhibit remarkable capacity to absorb what they need and exclude what they do not need. Some plants utilize exclusion mechanisms, where there is a reduced uptake by the roots or a restricted transport of the metals from root to shoots. Combination of high metal accumulation and high biomass production results in the most metal removal from the soil.

Conclusions

The present study indicated that vetivergrass possessed many beneficial characteristics to uptake Pb from contaminated soil. It was the most tolerant and could grow in soil contaminated with high Pb concentration. Cogongrass and carabaograss are also potential phytoremediators since they can absorb small amount of Pb in soils, although cogongrass is more tolerant to Pb-contaminated soil compared with carabaograss. The important implication of our findings is that vetivergrass can be used for phytoextraction on sites contaminated with high levels of heavy metals; particularly Pb.

Recommendations and Perspectives

High levels of Pb in localized areas are still a concern especially in urban areas with high levels of traffic, near Pb smelters, battery plants, or industrial facilities that burn fuel ending up in water and soils. The grasses used in the study, and particularly vetivergrass, can be used to phytoremediate urban soil with various contaminations by planting these grasses in lawns and public parks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker AJM (1981): Accumulation and excluders-strategies in the response of plants to heavy metals. Journal of Plant Nutrition 3, 643–654

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berti W, Cunningham SD (1997): In-place inactivation of Pb in Pb-contaminated soils. Environ Sci Technol 31, 1359–1364

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blaylock MJ (1998): Phytoremediation using brassica plant. Biotechnol. Inst Bull Lewis Publishing, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Bussler W (1981): Microscopic possibilities for diagnosis of trace elements stress in plants. J Plant Nutrition 3, 115–125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chaney RL, Malik M, Li Y, Brown SL, Brewer EP, Angle JS, Baker AJM (1997): Phytoremediation of soil metals. Curr Opin Biotechnol 8, 279–284

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H (2000): Chemical method and phytoremediation of soil contaminated with heavy metals. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 41, pp 229–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Cholpecka A, Bacon JR, Wilson MJ, Kay J (1996): Heavy metals in the environment. Forms of cadmium, lead, and zinc in contaminated soils from southwest Poland. J Environ Qual 25, 69–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham SD, Berti WR, Huang JW (1995): Phytoremediation of contaminated soils. Trends Biotechnol 13, 393–397

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham SD (1996): Promise and prospects for phytore-mediation. Plant Physiology 110, 715–719

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gray KA (2000): The phytoremediation of lead in urban, residential soils. Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield JC (1995): Vetivergrass, the ideal plant for vegetative soil and moisture conservation. The World Bank, Washington, DC, pp 31–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale MJ, Orcutt DM (1987): Physiology of plant under stress. Wiley and Sons, Inc., Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang JW, Chen J, Berti WR, Cunningham SD (1997): Phytoremediation of lead-contaminated soils: Role of synthetic chelates in lead phytoextraction. Environ Sci Technol 31, 800–805

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang JW, Cunningham SD (1996): Lead phytoextraction: species variation in lead uptake and translocation. The New Phytologist 134, 75–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huang JW, Cunningham SD (1997): Phytoextraction of lead from contaminated soils. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 283–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson ER, Shilling DG (1998): Cogongrass. Plant conservation alliance working group. University of Florida, Weed Science, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoll C (1997): Rehabilitation with vetiver. African Mining 2, 43–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Mekonnen A (2000): Handbook on vetivergrass technology — From Propagation to Utilization. GTZ IFSP S/GONDER, Ethiopia

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan CN, Yong RN, Gibbs VF (2001): Remediation technologies for metal-contaminated soils and groundwater — An evaluation. Engineering Geologist 60, 193–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ona LF, Alberto AP, Prudente JA, Sigua GC (2006): Levels of lead in urban soils from selected cities in the rice-based region of the Philippines. Env Sci Pollut Res 13(3) 177–183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pirkle JL, Kaufmann RB, Brody DJ, Hickman T, Gunter EW, Paschal DC (1998): Exposure of the U.S. population to lead, 1991–1994. Environ Health Perspect 106, 745–750

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pulford ID, Watson C (2003): Phytoremediation of heavy metal contaminated land by trees — A review. Environment International 29, 529–540

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Randolff B, Walsh K, Melzer A (1995): Direct revegetation of coal tailing at BHP, Saraji Mine. Australia Mining Council Environment Workshop, Darwin, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Raskin I, Kumar PBAN, Dushenkov V, Salt DE (1994): Bioconcentration of heavy metals by plants. Curr Opin Biotechnol 5, 285–290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roongtanakiat N, Chairoj P (2001): Vetivergrass for remedying soil contaminated with heavy metals

  • Salt DE, Smith RD, Raskin I (1998): Phytoremediation. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 49, 643–668

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SAS (Statistical Analysis System) (2000): SAS/STAT User’s Guide. Release 6.03. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, 494 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigua GC (2005): Current and future outlook of spoil and sludge materials in agriculture and environment. J Soils Sediments 5(1) 50–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigua GC, Adjei MB, Rechcigl JE (2005): Cumulative and residual effects of repeated sewage sludge applications: Forage productivity and soil quality implications in South Florida, USA. Env Sci Pollut Res 12(2) 80–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigua GC, Holtkamp ML, Coleman SW (2004a): Assessing the efficacy of dredged materials from Lake Panasoffkee, Florida: Implication to environment and agriculture. Part 1 — Soil and Environmental Quality Aspect. Env Sci Pollut Res 11(5) 321–326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sigua GC, Holtkamp ML, Coleman SW (2004b): Assessing the efficacy of dredged materials from Lake Panasoffkee, Florida: Implication to environment and agriculture. Part 2 — Pasture Establishment and Forage Quality. Env Sci Pollut Res 11(6) 394–399

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slatyer RO (1987): Plant-Water Relationship. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Troung PN (2000): The global impact of vetivergrass technology on the environment. Proceedings of the Second International Vetiver Conference, Thailand

  • Troung PN (1999): Application of the vetiver system for phytoremediation of mercury pollution in the Lake and Yolo counties. Northern California

  • Troung PN (1998): Vetivergrass technology as a bioengineering tool for infrastructure protection. Proceedings of the North Region Symposium Old Department of Main Roads, Carins, Australia

  • Troung PN, Baker D (1996): Vetivergrass system for environmental protection. Royal Development Projects Protection. Technical Bulletin No. 1998/1. Pacific Rim Vetiver. Office of the Royal Development Projects Board, Bangkok, Thiland

    Google Scholar 

  • Uera R, Paz-Alberto MA, Sigua GC (2007): Phytoremediation potentials of selected tropical plants for ethidium bromide. Env Sci Pollut Res, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1065/espr2007.02.391

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gilbert C. Sigua.

Additional information

ESS-Submission Editor: Dr. Willie Peijnenburg (wjgm.peijnenburg@rivm.nl)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paz-Alberto, A.M., Sigua, G.C., Baui, B.G. et al. Phytoextraction of lead-contaminated soil using vetivergrass (Vetiveria zizanioides L.), cogongrass (Imperata cylindrica L.) and carabaograss (Paspalum conjugatum L.). Env Sci Poll Res Int 14, 498–504 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1065/espr2007.05.415

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1065/espr2007.05.415

Keywords

Navigation