Abstract
This article scrutinizes the securitization of migrants in Hungary and Slovakia at the height of the EU’s migration ‘crisis’. It illustrates how political narratives portrayed migrants as a security threat and how they intersected with EU discourse and practice. I demonstrate how the logic of securitization was deployed by both governments for domestic political gains. I show that both prime ministers focused on ‘civilizational’ threats or alleged threats to their respective cultures along with economic insecurity, and physical threats they would allegedly create through, inter alia, ‘terrorist’ activities. Their ostensible intentions were to protect the economic, societal and human security of Hungarians and Slovaks, whilst ignoring the (in)security of migrants, and essentially using the ‘crisis’ to gain electoral support for their waning politics. This prioritization contradicted EU policy, thwarting the development of common practice. The securitization used to justify the two governments’ policies and practices raises further questions about EU order and governance including about what are commonly claimed to be EU values.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Initially the situation was referred to as a ‘migration crisis’ then changed to ‘migrant/refugee crisis’ by the EU.
The consultation had 12 questions. It include questions such as 3) Some people believe that migrants, who have been misrepresented by Brussels as migrants, have links to terrorists organisations. Do you agree with this? Is there a relationship between migration and terrorism?; 8) Do you support the Hungarian government in introducing stricter laws to allow the detention of illegal migrants crossing into Hungary? 10) Do you agree that economic migrants while they stay in Hungary should cover the cost of their own needs?
There was a counter-campaign by NGOs showing a different face of Hungary. While including this is beyond the scope of this paper, the counter-campaign demonstrate that the acquiescence of the Hungarian public was not simply to be take for granted but was an object of struggle.
Between 13 May and 13 August 2016, anti-EU-quota plan ads were ran 6224 times on TV, 1403 times on the radio, 2078 times in public places, 542 times in daily newspapers and 53 times in magazines (Román 2016).
The Czech Republic, Poland, Romania and Latvia also vetoed the Commission’s proposal.
This was because of the deliberate and successful strategy from opponents to boycott the referendum, hence the 43.9% turnout.
References
Austin, J.L. 1975. How to do things with words. In ed. James O. Urmson and Marina Sbisa, 2nd edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Aylott, N., and N. Bolin. 2015. Polarising pluralism: The Swedish parliamentary election of September 2014. West European Politics 38(3): 730–740.
Barlai, M., and E. Sík. 2017. A Hungarian trademark a “Hungarikum”: The moral panic button. In The migration crisis: European perspectives and national discourses, ed. M. Barlai, B. Fähnirch, C. Griessler, and M. Rhomber. Vienna: Lit Verlag.
Balzacq, T. 2005. The three faces of securitization: Political agency, audience and context. European Journal of International Relations 11(2): 171–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066105052960.
Bátorfy, A. 2019. The government of Hungary spent €216 million on propaganda and fearmongering in the past 8 years. https://english.atlatszo.hu/2019/01/11/the-government-of-hungary-spent-e216-million-on-propaganda-and-fearmongering-in-the-past-8-years/.
BBC. 2015. Migrant crisis: Clashes at Hungary-Serbia border. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-34272765.
Bernáth, G. and V. Messing. 2015. Bedarálva. A menekültekkel kapcsolatos kormányzati kampány és a tőle független megszólalás terepei. https://mediakutato.hu/cikk/2015_04_tel/01_menekultek_moralis_panik.pdf.
Bigo, D. 2002. Security and immigration: Toward a critique of the governmentality of unease. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political 27(1): 63–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/03043754020270S105.
Bilgin, P. 2003. Individual and societal dimensions of security. International Studies Review 5(2): 203–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1521-9488.502002.
Booth, K. 1991. Security and emancipation. Review of International Studies 17(4): 313–326.
Booth, K. 1997. Security and self: Reflections of a Fallen realist. In Critical security studies: Concepts and cases, ed. K. Krause and M. Williams, 83–119. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Budapest Business Journal. 2017. A third of young Hungarians seek fortunes abroad. https://bbj.hu/analysis/a-third-of-young-hungarians-seek-fortunes-abroad_141930.
Buzan, B., O. Waever, and J. de Wilde. 1998. Security: A new framework for analysis. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Connor, P. 2016. Number of Refugees to Europe Surges to Record 1.3 Million in 2015. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewglobal.org/2016/08/02/number-of-refugees-to-europe-surges-to-record-1-3-million-in-2015/.
Cunningham, B. 2016. 5 Takeaways from Slovakia’s Election. POLITICO. http://www.politico.eu/article/slovakia-fico-asylum-migrants-elections-nazi-nationalists/.
Czinkoczi, S. 2015. Kész az Orbán-terv az európai menekültválság megoldására. https://444.hu/2015/09/12/orban-viktor-3-milliard-eurot-adna-sziria-szomszedainak-a-menekultvalsag-megoldasara.
Doty, R. 1998. Immigration and the politics of security. Security Studies 8(2): 71–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636419808429375.
Dubeci, M. 2015. Čo si myslia ľudia o utečencoch?. Denník N. https://dennikn.sk/blog/co-si-myslia-ludia-o-utecencoch-vysledky-prieskumu-verejnej-mienky/.
European Commission. 2015. Country factsheet: Slovakia 2015 European Migration Network. https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/default/files/what-we-do/networks/european_migration_network/reports/docs/country-factsheets/24_slovakia_country_factsheet_2015.pdf.
European Commission. 2016. Asylum in The EU Member States. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/2995521/7203832/3-04032016-AP-EN.pdf/.
Emmers, R. 2013. Securitization. In Contemporary security studies, ed. A. Collins. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Farkas, A. 2020. Magyar–orosz relációban új megállapodás váltja föl a szovjet időket idéző nyugdíjegyezményt. https://www.vg.hu/velemeny/velemeny-rovat-hirei/magyar-orosz-relacioban-uj-megallapodas-valtja-fol-a-szovjet-idoket-idezo-nyugdijegyezmenyt-2-2116635/.
Foltyn, S. 2013. Slovakia's forgotten Roma. Aljazeera. Accessed April 18. http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2013/10/slovakia-forgotten-roma-201310782955139395.html.
Futak-Campbell, B., and M. Puetz. 2021. From the ‘Open door’ policy to the EU-Turkey deal: Media framings of German policy changes during the EU refugee ‘crisis.’ International Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117821999413.
Haszans. 2015. Orbán Úgy Jutott El A Falig, Hogy Európában Legfeljebb Hümmögnek Kicsit. 444.hu.https://444.hu/2015/06/19/orban-megtalalta-azt-a-temat-amire-csak-hummognek-europaban.
Herczeg, M. 2015a. Orbán Brüsszelben: Magyarországra Nem Hozni Kellene Bevándorlókat, Hanem El Kellene Őket Vinni. 444.hu. https://444.hu/2015/06/25/orban-brusszelben-magyarorszagra-nem-hozni-kellene-bevandorlokat-hanem-el-kellene-oket-vinni.
Herczeg, M. 2015b. Orbán: Illegális Bevándorlók Lázadásával Állunk Szemben. 444.hu. https://444.hu/2015/09/11/orban-illegalis-bevandorlok-lazadasaval-allunk-szemben.
Herczeg, M. 2015c. Orbán Viktor legújabb üzenete a migránsoknak: „Ne. Gyertek.” Politika. https://444.hu/2015/09/07/orban-viktor-legujabb-a-uzenete-a-migransoknak-ne-gyertek.
Hussain, Y., and P. Bagguley. 2012. Securitized citizens: Islamophobia, Racism and the 7/7 London Bombings. The Sociological Review 60(4): 715–734.
Huttner, R. 2015. Fico: Slovensko je ochotné prijať viac utečencov z Rakúska. Pravda.sk. https://spravy.pravda.sk/domace/clanok/364175-fico-slovensko-je-ochotne-prijat-viac-utecencov-od-rakuska/.
Huysmans, J. 2000. The European Union and the securitization of migration. Journal of Common Market Studies 38(5): p751-777. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00263.
Huysmans, J. 2006. The politics of insecurity. Fear, migration and asylum in the EU. London: Routledge.
Ilgit, A., and A. Klotz. 2018. Refugee rights or refugees as threats? Germany’s new asylum policy. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 20(3): 613–631.
International Organization for Migration. “Slovakia”. 2016. https://www.iom.int/countries/slovakia.
Ipsos-MORI. 2016. Public attitudes towards refugees in Europe https://www.ipsos-mori.com/researchpublications/researcharchive/3786/Public-attitudes-towards-refugees-in-Europe.aspx
Kanter, J. 2015. European Union asks member countries to accept quotas of migrants. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/28/world/europe/european-union-asks-member-countries-to-accept-quotas-of-migrants.html?_r=0.
Kingsley, P. 2016. Hungary's Refugee referendum not valid after voters stay away. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/oct/02/hungarian-vote-on-refugees-will-not-take-place-suggest-first-poll-results.
Kollarovics, I. 2015. Referendum je platné, obyvatelia Gabčíkova utečencov v obci nechcú. Pravda.sk. https://spravy.pravda.sk/regiony/clanok/363392-referendum-je-platne-obyvatelia-gabcikova-odmietli-utecencov-vo-svojej-obci/.
Kováts, A. 2014. Migrációshelyzetkép Magyarországon. In Migrációs tendenciák napjainkban, ed. I. Tarrósy, V. Glied, and Z. Vörös, 329–348. Pécs: Publikon PH.
Központi Statisztikai Hivatal (KSH). 2013. Menekültek az Európai Unióban. https://www.ksh.hu/docs/hun/xftp/stattukor/menekultekeu.pdf.
Lengyel, T. 2015. Újságban és óriásplakáton riasztja a menekülteket a kormány. https://www.origo.hu/itthon/20150902-ujsagban-es-oriasplakaton-riasztja-a-menekulteket-a-kormany.html.
Leonard, S. 2007. The ‘Securitization’ of Asylum and Migration in the European Union: Beyond the Copenhagen School’s Framework. Section 9: Security, Politics, Critique Panel 9–14: Securitization and the Other: Theorizing Immigration and Asylum Policies’. http://www.eisa-net.org/be-bruga/eisa/files/events/turin/Leonard-sgir_conference_paper_final_sleonard.pdf.
Little, A., and N. Vaughan-Williams. 2017. Stopping boats, saving lives, securing subjects: Humanitarian borders in Europe and Australia. European Journal of International Relations 23(3): 533–556.
Magyar Hírlap. 2015a. Orbán Viktor A Hét Személyisége. http://magyarhirlap.hu/cikk/34904/Orban_Viktor_a_het_szemelyisege.
Magyar Hírlap. 2015b. “Orbán Viktor: Az Európai Életforma Van Veszélyben”. http://magyarhirlap.hu/cikk/35367/Orban_Viktor_az_europai_eletforma_van_veszelyben#sthash.xBxLbJhr.dpuf.
Magyar Hírlap. 2016a. Orbán Viktor: Felháborító Az Európai Bizottság Javaslata. http://magyarhirlap.hu/cikk/54587/Orban_Viktor_Felhaborito_az_Europai_Bizottsag_javaslata.
Magyar Hírlap. 2016b. “Tévesek a magyar rendőri brutalitásról szóló jelentések” https://www.magyarhirlap.hu/kulfold/Tevesek_a_magyar_rendori_brutalitasrol_szolo_jelentesek.
Menedék. Migránsokat segítő egyesület. 2008. A magyarországi menekültügy története https://menedek.hu/hirek/magyarorszagi-menekultugy-tortenete.
Ministry of Foreign Affairs. 2015. National consultation on immigration to begin https://www.kormany.hu/en/prime-minister-s-office/news/national-consultation-on-immigration-to-begin.
Minority Rights. 2018. World Directory of Minorities and Indigenous Peoples: Roma https://minorityrights.org/minorities/roma-8/.
Mikuŝoviĉ, D. and M. Dugoviĉ. 2015. Koľko ich je a čo si myslia Moslimovia, ktorých chce Fico monitorovať. Denník N. https://dennikn.sk/296788/kolko-co-myslia-moslimovia-ktorych-chce-fico-monitorovat/.
Moreno-Lax, V. 2018. The EU humanitarian border and the securitization of human rights: The ‘rescue-through-interdiction/rescue-without-protection’ paradigm. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies 56(1): 119–140.
Orgovanova, K. 2017. Roma in Slovakia. Slovakia.org. Accessed April 17. http://www.slovakia.org/society-roma.htm.
Pallister-Wilkins, P. 2015. The humanitarian politics of European border policing: Frontex and border police in Evros. International Political Sociology 9(1): 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/ips.12076.
Peoples, C., and N. Vaughan-Williams. 2014. Securitization theory. In Critical security studies. An introduction, 2nd ed., ed. C. Peoples and N. Vaughan-Williams. London: Routledge.
Pesti Srácok. 2015. E-nemzeti konzultáció-online is lehet válaszolni a bevándorlásról és terrorizmusról szóló kérdőívre. https://pestisracok.hu/e-nemzeti-konzultacio-online-is-lehet-valaszolni-a-bevandorlasrol-es-terrorizmusrol-szolo-kerdoivre/.
Pilc, L. 2016. Fico: Myšlienka multikultúrnej Európy zlyhala. Pravda.sk. https://spravy.pravda.sk/domace/clanok/379212-fico-myslienka-multikulturnej-europy-zlyhala/.
Pinyol-Jiménez, G. 2012. The migration-security nexus in short: Instruments and actions in the European Union. Amsterdam Law Forum 4(1). https://ssrn.com/abstract=2007629.
Pravda.sk. 2015a. Fico pripustil, že Slovensko dobrovoľne prijme migrantov. https://spravy.pravda.sk/domace/clanok/359475-fico-pripustil-ze-slovensko-dobrovolne-prijme-migrantov/.
Pravda.sk. 2015b. Fico: Utečencom pomôžeme, rozlišujme však medzi ekonomickými a ostatnými. https://spravy.pravda.sk/domace/clanok/366219-fico-utecencom-pomozeme-rozlisujme-medzi-ekonomickymi-a-ostatnymi/.
Pravda.sk. 2015c. Utečenci: Európa ešte bude hľadať kompromis. 2015. https://spravy.pravda.sk/svet/clanok/367817-utecenci-europa-este-bude-hladat-kompromis/.
Publicus Research. 2015. Refugee Crisis: Hungary, A Divided Country. http://www.publicus.hu/blog/refugee_crisis_hungary_a_divided_country/.
Rényi, D. 2016. A Brit, A Francia, A Német És A Svéd Nagykövetségen Sem Értik A Magyar Kormány No-Go Zónázását. 444.hu. https://444.hu/2016/09/22/a-brit-a-francia-a-nemet-es-a-sved-nagykovetsegen-sem-ertik-a-magyar-kormany-no-go-zonazasat.
Reuters. 2015. Hungarian police launch probe of camp feeding video. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-europe-migrants-hungary-police/hungarian-police-launch-probe-of-camp-feeding-video-idUSKCN0RB0Q320150911.
Román, B. 2016. 9 nap alatt 4219 másodperc félelem. http://kreativ.hu/cikk/9_nap_alatt_4219_masodperc_felelem.
Rovó, A. and S.Z. Dull. 2016. Lehet hinni a kormány új menekültplakátjainak? https://index.hu/belfold/2016/07/20/lehet_hinni_a_kormany_uj_menekultplakatjainak/.
Sik, E., B. Simonovits, and B. Szeitl. 2016. Az idegenellenesség alakulása és a bevándorlással kapcsolatos félelmek Magyarországon és a visegrádi országokban. REGIO, 2:81–108. http://regio.tk.mta.hu/index.php/regio/article/view/114/pdf_95.
Simonovits, B., A. Bernat, Szeitl, B., Sik, E., Boda, D., Kertesz, A., Toth, F. and Barta, J. 2016. The social aspects of the 2015 migration crisis in Hungary. Budapest: TARKI Social Institute. http://www.tarki.hu/hu/news/2016/kitekint/20160330_refugees.pdf.
SITA. 2015. Prieskum: Slovensko by nemalo prijať utečencov. http://www.sita.sk/sk/blog/2015/06/prieskum-slovensko-by-nemalo-prijat-utecencov/.
SME.sk. 2014. Výsledky prezidentských volieb 2014. https://volby.sme.sk/prezidentske-volby/2014/vysledky.
SME.sk. 2015a. Islam nemá podľa Fica na Slovensku priestor. https://domov.sme.sk/c/20173191/islam-na-slovensku-nema-priestor-vyhlasil-fico.html#ixzz4aeR2NyOX.
SME.sk. 2015b. Referendum: Gabčíkovo inhabitants do not want refugees there. https://spectator.sme.sk/c/20059217/referendum-gabcikovo-inhabitants-do-not-want-refugees-there.html.
SME.sk. 2016a. Iná vláda by na Slovensko navozila tisícky migrantov. https://domov.sme.sk/c/20073829/ina-vlada-by-na-slovensko-navozila-tisicky-migrantov.html#ixzz4ZzkpS48n.
SME.sk. 2016b. “V4 V Poľsku: Orbán a pevnosť chrániaca Európu”. https://svet.sme.sk/c/20265023/v4-v-polsku-orban-a-pevnost-chraniaca-europu.html.
Strickland, P. 2017. Life in Slovakia's Roma slums: Poverty and segregation. https://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2017/04/life-slovakia-roma-slums-poverty-segregation-170425090756677.html.
Stritzel, H. 2014. Security in translation. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
TARKI. 2018. Pártok támogatottságának alakulása az összes megkérdezett körében 2000–2018. http://www.tarki.hu/partok-tamogatottsaganak-alakulasa-az-osszes-megkerdezett-koreben.
Teraz.sk. 2015. Pre Slovákov sú utečenci TOP témou. http://www.teraz.sk/slovensko/utecenci-boli-v-septembri-pre-slovakov/158560-clanok.html.
The Economist. 2013. Slovaks and Roma: Walls are going up again. http://www.economist.com/blogs/easternapproaches/2013/07/slovaks-and-roma.
UNHCR The UN Refugee Agency. 2016. UNHCR alarmed at refugee death on Hungary-Serbia border. https://www.unhcr.org/ceu/387-ennews2016unhcr-alarmed-at-refugee-death-on-hungary-serbia-border-html.html.
Vaniher, L. 2015. Fico na rozlúčke s vojakmi: Utečenecká kríza je aj bezpečnostná. Pravda.sk. https://spravy.pravda.sk/domace/clanok/372350-fico-na-rozlucke-s-vojakmi-utecenecka-kriza-je-aj-bezpecnostna/.
Waever, O. 1995. On Security. In Securitization and Desecuritization, ed. R. D. Lipschutz, 46–87. Columbia University Press.
Waever, O. 2000. The EU as a security actor: Reflections from a pessimistic constructivist on post-sovereign security orders. In International relations theory and the politics of european integration: Power, security, and community, 1st ed., ed. M. Kelstrup and M. Willaims. London: Routledge.
World Health Organisation. 2016. Hungary: Assessing health-system capacity to manage sudden, large influxes of migrants. https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0016/317131/Hungary-report-assessing-HS-capacity-manage-sudden-large-influxes-migrants.pdf.
Wike, R., B. Stokes. and Simmons, K. 2016. Europeans not convinced growing diversity is a good thing, divided on what determines national identity. Pew Research Center's Global Attitudes Project. http://www.pewglobal.org/2016/07/11/europeans-not-convinced-growing-diversity-is-a-good-thing-divided-on-what-determines-national-identity/.
Williams, M. 2003. Words, images, enemies: securitization and international politics. International Studies Quarterly 47(4). https://academic.oup.com/isq/article/47/4/511/1804912.
Winneker, C. 2016. Price for rejecting Refugees: €250,000 Per Head. In POLITICO. https://www.politico.eu/article/commission-wants-to-make-eu-countries-pay-for-not-accepting-refugees/.
Acknowledgement
I would like to thank Katarína Jakubčeková for her assistance with the article. Also, the funding body NIAS-KNAW should be acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Futák-Campbell, B. Facilitating crisis: Hungarian and Slovak securitization of migrants and their implications for EU politics. Int Polit 59, 541–561 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-021-00305-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-021-00305-4