Skip to main content
Log in

Market-seeking MNEs in an emerging market: How parent–subsidiary links shape overseas success

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of International Business Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study extends research on parent–subsidiary links, applying new theoretical perspectives – those of resource dependence and dynamic capability – to the new empirical setting of an emerging market. We suggest that parent–subsidiary links help to mitigate emerging market threats by reducing external dependence, and help to capitalize on emerging market opportunities by enhancing local responsiveness.

We identify four dimensions (resource commitment, information flow, local responsiveness and control flexibility) to parent–subsidiary links, and examine environmental effects in moderating the contribution of these dimensions. The analysis of 196 Multi National Enterprise (MNE) subsidiaries in China shows that a parent firm's control flexibility, resource commitment and local responsiveness exert a strong and positive influences on subsidiary performance. These influences are weaker when regulatory interference is higher, but stronger when industrial opportunity is richer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The term ‘control flexibility’ overlaps in large part with the concept of centralization used in the parent–subsidiary link literature (e.g., Gates and Egelhoff, 1986; Egelhoff, 1982,1991; Stopford and Wells, 1972). We used this term as we focused on the flexibility aspect of parent control. Since this study did not emphasize detailed insights into how overseas decisions are jointly made by parent and subsidiary managers, we did not label it as centralization.

  2. This study focused on manufacturing subsidiaries and did not include sales sub-units (which would maintain a much higher sales/asset ratio than the former). Sales/asset ratio was used because we emphasized local market-seeking MNEs and intended to control the size effect in sales performance. Research on market-seeking MNEs widely agrees that sales efficiency in the utilization of deployed assets is one of the major performance targets underlying international expansion (Doz and Prahalad, 1984; Dunning, 1995; Michel and Shaked, 1986).

  3. In measuring the information flow construct, we converted the number of email/phone/fax exchanges into a 5-point scale (1 if <1, 2 if between 1–3, 3 if between 3–5, 4 if between 5–7, 5 if >7) to integrate with two other subjective items.

  4. Two referees suggested that the wording may not lead to clear measurements because it is likely to be value-laden. However we believe that this negative expression approach (scores inverted in the analysis) is appropriate. First, we found in our pre-survey field study that most subsidiaries we visited were surprisingly disappointed with parent support, commitment and responsiveness. Second, our pilot test at the design stage found that this approach made respondents more careful in reading question items, thus probably providing more accurate responses.

  5. To mitigate the possibility of socially desirable responses, we left all respondents unidentified. During the survey, we also interviewed 18 senior managers from nine sample subsidiaries, asking them about parent's resource commitment, local responsiveness, information flow and control flexibility. The results demonstrated a high consistency between the two interviewees from each firm (Guttman R>0.83).

  6. To cast further light on the validity of findings regarding local responsiveness and control flexibility, we conducted covariance structure analysis using a structural equation modeling technique. The path loadings of the four question items in relation to a parent's overall adaptation (a 5-point scale item in the questionnaire) were significant at the 0.001 level (Bentler's comparative fit index: 0.95). The path loadings of the four items in relation to a parent's overall control flexibility were also significant at the 0.001 level (Bentler's comparative fit index: 0.92).

  7. The causality of resource commitment, local responsiveness and control flexibility in relation to performance may be a two-way link. To examine how such variables influence performance, the temporal structure in our research design was commitment/responsiveness/control over the past 3 years, measured against today's performance. To examine whether and how superior performers receive stronger resource commitment, or perceive greater levels of responsiveness flexibility from parent firms (another possibility), future research should explore how past performance is associated with current resource commitment, responsiveness or flexibility.

  8. When the interaction terms are included, some original effects decline (Model 4b). Generally, this decline does not impact on the determination of a moderating effect (Aiken and West, 1991). To further check all proposed moderating effects, we performed a plot analysis for each moderator based on regression results (Models 3–5). The plot graphs showed the same results as we interpreted from the interaction terms.

References

  • Aiken, L.S. and West, S.G. 1991 Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions, Sage: Newbury Park, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baliga, B.R. and Jaeger, A.M. 1984 ‘Multinational corporations: control systems and delegation issues’, Journal of International Business Studies 25–40.

  • Bartlett, C.A. and Ghoshal, S. 1989 Managing Across Borders, Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J. 1997 ‘Entrepreneurship in multinational corporations: the characteristics of subsidiary initiatives’, Strategic Management Journal 18(3): 207–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J., Hood, N. and Jonsson, S. 1998 ‘Building firm-specific advantages in multinational corporations: the role of subsidiary initiative’, Strategic Management Journal 19: 221–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw, J. and Morrison, A.J. 1995 ‘Configurations of strategy and structure in subsidiaries of multinational corporations’, Journal of International Business Studies 26(4): 729–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cray, D. 1984 ‘Control and coordination in multi-national corporations’, Journal of International Business Studies 85–98.

  • Delios, A. and Henisz, W.J. 2000 ‘Japanese firms’ investment strategies in emerging economies’, Academy of Management Journal 43(3): 305–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doz, Y. and Prahalad, C.K. 1981 ‘Headquarters influence and strategic control in multinational companies’, Sloan Management Review 22(4): 15–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doz, Y. and Prahalad, C.K. 1984 ‘Patterns of strategic control within multinational corporations’, Journal of International Business Studies 55–72.

  • Dunning, J.H. 1995 Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy, Addison-Wesley: Wokingham, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egelhoff, W.G. 1982 ‘Strategy and structure in multinational corporations: an information processing approach’, Administrative Science Quarterly 27(3): 435–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egelhoff, W.G. 1988 ‘Strategy and structure in multinational corporations: a revision of the Stopford and Wells model’, Strategic Management Journal 9: 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egelhoff, W.G. 1991 ‘Information-processing theory and the multinational enterprise’, Journal of International Business Studies 22(3): 341–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gates, S.R and Egelhoff, W.G. 1986 ‘Centralization in headquarter-subsidiary relationships’, Journal of International Business Studies 17(2): 71–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gencturk, E.F. and Aulakh, P.S. 1995 ‘The use of process and output controls in foreign markets’, Journal of International Business Studies 26(4): 755–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geringer, J.M., Beamish, P.W. and daCosta, R.C. 1989 ‘Diversification strategy and internationalization: Implications for MNE performance’, Strategic Management Journal 10: 109–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golden, B.R. 1992 ‘SBU strategy and performance: the moderating effects of the corporate–SBU relationship’, Strategic Management Journal 13: 145–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A.K. 1987 ‘SBU strategies, corporate–SBU relations, and SBU effectiveness in strategy implementation’, Academy of Management Journal 30(3): 477–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, A.K. and Govindarajan, V. 1991 ‘Knowledge flows and the structure of control within multinational corporations’, Academy of Management Review 29: 714–895.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habib, M.M. and Victor, B. 1991 ‘Strategy, structure, and performance of US manufacturing and service MNCs: a comparative analysis’, Strategic Management Journal 12: 589–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hitt, M.A., Hoskisson, R.E. and Kim, H. 1997 ‘International diversification: effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms’, Academy of Management Journal 40: 767–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (2001) Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations, Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoskisson, R.E., Eden, L., Lau, C. and Wright, M. 2000 ‘Strategy in emerging economies’, Academy of Management Journal 43(3): 249–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson Jr, J.H. 1995 ‘An empirical analysis of the integration-responsiveness framework: US construction equipment industry firms in global competition’, Journal of International Business Studies 26(3): 621–635.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobrin, S.J. 1982 Managing Political Risk Assessment: Strategic Responses to Environmental Changes, University of California Press: Berkeley, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobrin, S.J. 1991 ‘An empirical analysis of the determinants of global integration’, Strategic Management Journal 12: 17–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B. 1985 ‘Designing global strategies: profiting from operational flexibility’, Sloan Management Review 26: 27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B. 1994 ‘Options thinking and platform investments: investing in opportunity’, California Management Review 36: 52–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B. and Singh, H. 1988 ‘The effect of national culture in the choice of entry mode’, Journal of International Business Studies 19: 411–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y. 2002 ‘Capability exploitation and building in a foreign market: implications for multinational enterprises’, Organization Science 13(1): 48–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y. and Peng, M.W. 1999 ‘Learning to compete in a transition economy: experience, environment, and performance’, Journal of International Business Studies 30(2): 278–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K.E. 1998 Direct Investment in Economies in Transition, Elgar: Aldershot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K.E. and Estrin, S. 2001 ‘Brownfield entry in emerging markets’, Journal of International Business Studies 32(3): 575–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michel, A. and Shaked, I. 1986 ‘Multinational corporations vs. domestic corporations: financial performance and characteristics’, Journal of International Business Studies 16: 68–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. 1987 ‘The structural and environmental correlates of business strategy’, Strategic Management Journal 7: 55–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, K.D. 1992 ‘A framework for integrated risk management in international business’, Journal of International Business Studies 23: 311–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, C.A. 1985 ‘Product-market diversification and market power’, Academy of Management Journal 28: 789–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moran, T. 1985 Multinational Corporations: The Political Economy of Foreign Direct Investment, Lexington Books: Lexington, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, A.D. and Roth, K. 1992 ‘A taxonomy of business-level strategies in global industries’, Strategic Management Journal 13(6): 399–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C. 1991 ‘Strategic responses to institutional processes’, Academy of Management Review 16: 145–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxley, J.E. 1997 ‘Appropriability hazards and governance in strategic alliances: a transaction cost approach’, Journal of Law, Economics & Organization. 13(2): 387–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J.R. and Salancik, G.R. 1978 The External Control of Organization, Harper & Row: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, M.W. 2000 Business Strategies in Transition Economies, Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C.K. and Doz, Y. 1987 The Multinational Mission: Balancing Local Demands and Global Vision, Free Press: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig, P.M. and Singh, J.V. 1991 ‘Organizational environments and the multinational enterprise’, Academy of Management Review 16(2): 340–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, K. and Morrison, A.J. 1990 ‘An empirical analysis of the integration-responsiveness framework in global industries’, Journal of International Business Studies 21(4): 541–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, K. and Morrison, A.J. 1992 ‘Implementing global strategy: characteristics of global subsidiary mandates’, Journal of International Business Studies 23(4): 715–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, K., Schweiger, D. and Morrison, A.J. 1991 ‘Global strategy implementation at the business unit level: operational capabilities and administrative mechanisms’, Journal of International Business Studies 22(3): 369–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F.M. and Ross, D. 1990 Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, Houghton Mifflin Co.: Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stopford, J. and Wells Jr, L.T. 1972 Managing the Multinational Enterprise, Basic Books: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taggart, J.H. 1998 ‘Strategy shifts in MNC subsidiaries’, Strategic Management Journal 19: 663–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tallman, S. 1992 ‘A strategic management perspective on host country structure of multinational enterprises’, Journal of Management 18: 455–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. 1986 ‘Transaction cost economies and the multinational enterprises’, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1: 21–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D., Pisano, G. and Shuen, A. 1997 ‘Dynamic capabilities and strategic management’, Strategic Management Journal 18: 509–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uhlenbruck, K., and De Castro, J.O. 2000 ‘Foreign acquisitions in Central and Eastern Europe: outcomes of privatization in transitional economies’, Academy of Management Journal 43(3): 381–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank three anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful inputs.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Y Luo.

Additional information

Accepted by Tom Brewer; outgoing Editor, 4 October 2002.

Appendix A

Appendix A

Table A1

Table a1 Question items concerning parent-subsidiary links

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Luo, Y. Market-seeking MNEs in an emerging market: How parent–subsidiary links shape overseas success. J Int Bus Stud 34, 290–309 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400027

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400027

Keywords

Navigation