Skip to main content
Log in

Recruits’ Corporate Brand Co-creation Experiences of the Finnish Military Forces

  • The Contributors
  • Published:
Corporate Reputation Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Co-creation has become one of the recent interests in branding. The purpose of this study is to reveal how the co-creators experience the brand they are co-creating. For measuring the brand co-creators experience, we chose to use the corporate character scale developed by Davies et al. For the empirical context, we chose a transportation arm of the Finnish military forces, a military driving school. The data were gathered via a questionnaire from 264 recruits in Spring 2008. The questions consisted of 49 personality scale statements measured on a Likert 7 scale. The analyses were made with second order confirmatory factor analysis, descriptive graphics and analysis of variance. The study revealed that the corporate character scale is usable in a public, non-profit organisation. The experiences of the recruits on the military driving school are more positive than negative; they consider that it is Agreeable and Competent rather than Ruthless. The study contributes to the existing literature on brand co-creating by revealing how the actively engaging co-creators experience the brand they are co-creating. This might be the first time co-creators’ experiences of the brand have been studied, at least in this kind of context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaker, D.A. (1991) Managing Brand Equity: Capitalizing of the Value of a Brand Name, The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aaker, J.L. (1997) ‘Dimensions of brand personality’, Journal of Marketing Research, 34 (3), 347–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abratt, R. (1989) ‘A new approach to the corporate image management process’, Journal of Marketing Management, 5 (1), 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahonen, M., Juntunen, J., Autere, V. and Saarinen, T. (2008) ‘The corporate character scale in the finnish military context. Proceedings of the Australian New Zealand Marketing Academy Conference ANZMAC, Sydney, Australia, 1–3 December.

  • Argyris, C. (1957) Personality and Organisation, Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aurand, T.W., Gorchels, L. and Bishop, T.R. (2005) ‘Human resource management's role in internal branding: An opportunity for cross-functional brand message synergy’, The Journal of Product and Brand Management, 14 (2/3), 163–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balmer, J.M.T. (1998) ‘Corporate identity and the advent of corporate marketing’, Journal of Marketing Management, 14 (8), 963–996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balmer, J.M.T. (2001) ‘Corporate identity, corporate branding and corporate marketing. Seeing through the fog’, European Journal of Marketing, 35 (3/4), 248–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balmer, J.M.T. (2003) ‘The three virtues and seven deadly sins of corporate brand management’, in J.M.T. Balmer and S.A. Greyser (eds.), Revealing the Corporation. Perspectives on Identity, Image, Reputation, Corporate Branding and Corporate-level Marketing, Routledge, London, pp. 299–316. Earlier published in Journal of General Management 2001, 27(1): 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balmer, J.M.T. (2010) ‘Explicating corporate brands and their management: Reflections and directions from 1995’, Journal of Brand Management, 18 (3), 180–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balmer, J.M.T. and Gray, E.R. (2003) ‘Corporate brands: What are they? What of them?’ European Journal of Marketing, 37 (7/8), 972–997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrick, M.R. and Mount, M.K. (1991) ‘The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis’, Personnel Psychology, 44 (1), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendapudi, N. and Leone, R.P. (2003) ‘Psychological implications of customer participation in coproduction’, Journal of Marketing, 67 (1), 14–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berens, G. and Van Riel, C.B.M. (2004) ‘Corporate associations in the academic literature: Three main streams of thought in the reputation measurement literature’, Corporate Reputation Review, 7 (2), 161–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berens, G., van Riel, C.B.M. and van Bruggen, G.H. (2005) ‘Corporate associations and consumer product responses: The moderating role of corporate brand dominance’, Journal of Marketing, 69 (3), 35–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry, L. and Parasuraman, A. (1991) Marketing Services – Competing Through Quality, Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, L.L. (2000) ‘Cultivating service brand equity’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28 (1), 128–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biel, A.L. (1993) ‘Converting image into equity’, in D.A. Aaker and A. Biel (eds.), Brand Equity and Advertising: Advertising's Role in Building Strong Brands, Lawrence-Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 67–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, K.E. (1956) The Image, Ann Arbor, MI.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, E. (2007) ‘A process model of brand cocreation: Brand management and research implications’, The Journal of Product & Brand Management, 16 (2), 79–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodie, R.J., Glynn, M.S. and Little, V. (2006) ‘The service brand and the service-dominant logic: Missing fundamental premise or the need for stronger theory?’ Marketing Theory, 6 (3), 363–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chun, R. and Davies, G. (2006) ‘The influence of corporate character on customers and employees: Exploring similarities and differences’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34 (2), 138–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, G. (2007) ‘Employer branding and its influence on managers’, European Journal of Marketing, 42 (5/6), 667–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, G. and Chun, R. (2002) ‘Gaps between the internal and external perceptions of the corporate brand’, Corporate Reputation Review, 5 (2/3), 144–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, G., Chun, R., da Silva, V. and Roper, S. (2001) ‘The personification metaphor as a measurement approach for corporate reputation’, Corporate Reputation Review, 4 (2), 113–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, G., Chun, R., da Silva, V. and Roper, S. (2003) Corporate Reputation and Competitiveness, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, G., Chun, R., da Silva, V. and Roper, S. (2004) ‘A corporate character scale to assess employee and customer views of organization reputation’, Corporate Reputation Review, 7 (2), 125–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etgar, M. (2008) ‘A descriptive model of the consumer co-production process’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36 (1), 97–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C.J. and van Riel, C.B.M. (1997) ‘The reputational landscape’, Corporate Reputation Review, 1 (1), 5–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C. and Larcker, D.F. (1981) ‘Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error’, Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (1), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fournier, S. (1998) ‘Consumers and their brands: Developing relationship theory in consumer research’, Journal of Consumer Research, 24 (4), 343–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furnham, A. and Gunter, B. (1993) Corporate Assessment: Auditing a Company's Personality, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fyrberg, A. and Jüriado, R. (2009) ‘What about interaction? Networks and brands as integrators within service-dominant logic’, Journal of Service Management, 20 (4), 420–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geyskens, I., Steenkamp, J-B.E.M. and Kumar, N. (1998) ‘Generalizations about trust in marketing channel relationships using meta-analysis’, International Journal of Research in Marketing, 15 (3), 223–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, A. (2007) ‘Involving stakeholders in developing corporate brands: The communication dimension’, Journal of Marketing Management, 23 (1–2), 59–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gylling, C. and Lindberg-Repo, K. (2006) ‘Investigating the links between a corporate brand and a customer brand’, Journal of Brand Management, 13 (4/5), 257–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, F. and Christensen, L.B. (2007) ‘Dimensions in consumer evaluation of corporate brands and the role of emotional response strength (NERS)’, Innovative Marketing, 3 (3), 19–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, M.J. and Schultz, M. (2001) ‘Are the strategic stars aligned for your corporate brand?’ Harvard Business Review, 2 (79), 128–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, M.J. and Schultz, M. (2003) ‘Bringing the corporation into corporate branding’, European Journal of Marketing, 37 (7/8), 1041–1064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, M.J. and Schultz, M. (2010) ‘Toward a theory of brand co-creation with implications for brand governance’, Journal of Brand Management, 17 (8), 590–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G.H. (1991) Culture and Organization: Software of the Mind, HarperCollins Business, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, R.T. (1986) Manual for the Hogan Personality Inventory, National Computer Systems, Minneapolis, MN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K.G. and Sörbom, D. (1993) LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language, SSI, Lincolnwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K.G., Sörbom, D., Du Toit, S. and du Toit, M. (2000) LISREL 8: New Statistical Features, SSI, Lincolnwood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juntunen, M. (2012) ‘Co-creating corporate brand in start-ups’, Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 30 (2), 230–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juntunen, M., Saraniemi, S., Halttu, M. and Tähtinen, J. (2010) ‘Corporate brand building in different stages of small business growth’, Journal of Brand Management, 18 (2), 115–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapferer, J.-N. (1997) Strategic Brand Management, Kogan Page, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, S. (1977) ‘Nurturing corporate images’, European Journal of Marketing, 11 (3), 120–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, S. (1973) Developing New Brands, Pitman, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knox, S. and Bickerton, D. (2003) ‘The six conventions of corporate branding’, European Journal of Marketing, 37 (7/8), 998–1016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leitch, S. and Richardson, N. (2003) ‘Corporate branding in the new economy’, European Journal of Marketing, 37 (7/8), 1065–1079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martineau, P. (1958) ‘The personality of the retail store’, Harvard Business Review, 36 (1), 47–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAlexander, J.H., Schouten, J.W. and Koenig, H.F. (2002) ‘Building brand community’, Journal of Marketing, 66 (1), 38–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melewar, T.C. and Walker, C.M. (2003) ‘Global corporate brand building: Guidelines and case studies’, Journal of Brand Management, 11 (2), 157–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merz, M.A., He, Y. and Vargo, S.L. (2009) ‘The evolving brand logic: A service-dominant logic perspective’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37 (3), 328–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgeson, F.P. and Hofmann, D.A. (1999) ‘The structure and function of collective constructs: Implications for multilevel research and theory development’, Academy of Management Review, 24 (2), 249–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee, A. and Balmer, J.M.T. (2007) ‘New frontiers and perspectives in corporate brand management: In search of a theory’, International Studies of Management & Organization, 37 (4), 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muniz, A.M. and O'Guinn, T.C. (2001) ‘Brand community’, Journal of Consumer Research, 27 (4), 412–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muzellec, L. (2006) ‘What is in a name change? Re-joycing corporate names to create corporate brands’, Corporate Reputation Review, 8 (4), 305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, A.F., Storbacka, K. and Frow, P. (2008) ‘Managing the co-creation of value’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36 (1), 83–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, A.F., Storbacka, K., Frow, P. and Knox, S. (2009) ‘Co-creating brands: Diagnosing and designing the relationship experience’, Journal of Business Research, 62 (3), 379–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, R.A. and Wilson, W.R. (1992) ‘Measuring customer satisfaction: Fact and artifact’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 20 (1), 61–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pine, B.J. and Gilmore, J.H. (1999) The Experience Economy: Work is Theatre and Every Business a Stage, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pitt, L.F., Watson, R.T., Berthon, P., Wynn, D. and Zinkhan, G. (2006) ‘The Penguin's window: Corporate brands from an open-source perspective’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34 (2), 115–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C.K. (2004) ‘The co-creation of value – Invited commentary’, Journal of Marketing, 68 (1), 23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C.K. and Ramaswamy, V. (2004) ‘Co-creating unique value with customers’, Strategy and Leadership, 32 (3), 4–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ries, A. and Trout, J. (1982) Positioning: The Battle for Your Mind, McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stapley, L.F. (1996) The Personality of the Organisation, Free Association Books, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, H. (1999) ‘Towards a definitive model of the corporate identity management process’, Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 4 (4), 200–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urde, M. (2003) ‘Core value based corporate brand building’, European Journal of Marketing, 37 (7/8), 1017–1040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urde, M. (2009) ‘Uncovering the corporate brand's core values’, Management Decision, 47 (4), 616–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaeraas, A. (2008) ‘Can public sector organizations be coherent corporate brands?’ Marketing Theory, 8 (2), 205–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bosch, A.L.M., Elving, W.J.L. and de Jong, M.D.T. (2006) ‘The impact of organisational characteristics on corporate visual identity’, European Journal of Marketing, 40 (7/8), 870–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Rekom, J. and van Riel, C.B.M. (2000) ‘Operational measures of organizational identity: A review of existing methods’, Corporate Reputation Review, 3 (4), 334–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Riel, C.B.M., Stroeker, N.E. and Maathuis, O.J.M. (1998) ‘Measuring corporate images’, Corporate Reputation Review, 1 (4), 313–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Riel, C.M.B. and Balmer, J.M.T. (1997) ‘Corporate identity: The concept, its measurement and management’, European Journal of Marketing, 31 (5/6), 340–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S.L. and Lusch, R.F. (2004) ‘Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing’, Journal of Marketing, 68 (1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargo, S.L. and Lusch, R.F. (2008) ‘From goods to service(s): Divergences and convergences of logics’, Industrial Marketing Management, 37 (3), 254–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Lieutenant Colonel Timo Saarinen for his valuable help in data gathering and to two anonymous reviewers whose valuable comments helped to improve the quality of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Juntunen, M., Juntunen, J. & Autere, V. Recruits’ Corporate Brand Co-creation Experiences of the Finnish Military Forces. Corp Reputation Rev 15, 88–104 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1057/crr.2012.2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/crr.2012.2

Keywords

Navigation