Skip to main content

Mediatization and Political Agenda-Setting: Changing Issue Priorities?

  • Chapter
Mediatization of Politics

Abstract

Agenda-setting is one of the most influential theories on the media’s political influence (Graber, 2005). While often focusing on the media’s impact on public opinion, another equally important facet of agenda-setting theory has the media’s influence over the agendas of political actors and policy makers as its central object of investigation. Scholars use the term “political agenda-setting” and in some instances “agenda-building” to refer to the transfer of media priorities to political priorities. Despite the growing popularity and importance of political agenda-setting research, it has seldom been conceptualized as part of or related to the mediatization of politics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. (1962). Two Faces of Power. American Political Science Review, 56, 941–952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartels, L. M. (1996, September 1996). Politicians and the Press: Who Leads, Who Follows? Paper presented at the APSA 1996, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, F. R., Jones, B. D., & Leech, B. L. (1997). Media Attention and Congressional Agendas. In S. Iyengar & R. Reeves (Eds.), Do the Media Govern? Politicians, Voters and Reporters in America (pp. 349–363). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, L. (1990). Toward a Theory of Press-State Relations in the United States. Journal of Communication, 40, 103–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, L., & Iyengar, S. (2008). A New Era of Minimal Effects? The Changing Foundations of Political Communication. Journal of Communication, 58, 707–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, L., & Livingston, S. (2003). A Semi-independent Press: Government Control and Journalistic Autonomy in the Political Construction of News. Political Communication, 20, 359–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz, D. (1992). Who Sets the Media Agenda? The Ability of Policymakers to Determine News Decisions. In D. Kennamer (Ed.), Public, Opinion, the Press and Public Policy (pp. 81–103). Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonafont, L. C., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2013). Newspaper Attention and Policy Activities in Spain. Journal of Public Policy, 33(01), 65–88. doi: doi:10.1017/S0143814X12000219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandenburg, H. (2002). Who Follows Whom? The Impact of Parties on Media Agenda Formation in the 1997 British General Elections Campaign. Harvard Journal of Press and Politics, 7(3), 34–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, M. (2009). Valence and Electoral Outcomes in Western Europe, 1976–1998. Electoral Studies, 28(1), 111–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, R. W., & Elder, C. D. (1972). Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda Building. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, R. W., & Elder, C. D. (1981). Communication and Public Policy. In D. D. Nimmo & K. R. Sanders (Eds.), Handbook of Political Communication (pp. 391–416). Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, F. L., & Skogan, W. G. (1991). Convergent and Divergent Voice Models of the Rise and Fall of Policy Issues. In D. L. Protess & M. E. McCombs (Eds.), Agendasetting: Readings on Media, Public Opinion and Policymaking (pp. 189–206). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. E. (2005). Governing with the News: The News Media as a Political Institution. 2nd Edition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dearing, J. W., & Rogers, E. M. (1996). Communication Concepts 6: Agenda-setting. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denham, B. E. (2010). Toward Conceptual Consistency in Studies of Agenda-building Processes: A Scholarly Review. Review of Communication, 10(4), 306–323. doi: 10.1080/15358593.2010.502593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donges, P. (2008). Medialisierung politischer Organisationen: Parteien in der Mediengesellschaft. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, G. C., & Wood, D. (1999). Who Influences Whom? The President, Congress and the Media. American Political Science Review, 93(2), 327–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eilders, C. (2000). Media as Political Actors? Issue Focusing and Selective Emphasis in the German Quality Press. German Politics, 9(3), 181–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmelund-Praestekaer, C., Hopmann, D. N., & Nørgaard, A. S. (2011). Does Mediatization Change MP-Media Interaction and MP Attitudes Toward the Media? Evidence from a Longitudinal Study of Danish MPs. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 16(3), 382–403. doi: 10.1177/1940161211400735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esser, F. (2008). Dimensions of Political News Cultures: Sound Bite and Image Bites News in France, Germany, Great Britain and the United States. International Journal of Press/Politics, 13(4), 401–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esser, F. (2013). Mediatization as a Challenge: Media Logic Versus Political Logic. In H. Kriesi, S. Lavenex, F. Esser, M. Bühlmann, J. Matthes & D. Bochsler (Eds.), Democracy in the Age of Globalization and Mediatization (pp. 155–176). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esser, F., & Matthes, J. (2013). Mediatization Effects on Political News, Political Actors, Political Decisions, and Political Audiences. In H. Kriesi, S. Lavenex, F. Esser, M. Bühlmann, J. Matthes & D. Bochsler (Eds.), Democracy in the Age of Globalization and Mediatization (pp. 177–201). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esser, F., & Pfetsch, B. (2004). Comparing Political Communication: Theories, Cases and Challenges. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fenno, R. F. (1973). Congressmen in Committees. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilberg, S., Eyal, C., McCombs, M., & Nicholas, D. (1980). The State of the Union Address and the Press Agendas. Journalism Quarterly, 57, 584–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graber, D. (2005). Political Communication Faces the 21st Century. Journal of Communication, 55(3), 479–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green-Pedersen, C. (2011). Partier i nye tider: Den politiske dagsorden i Danmark. Aarhus University, School of Business and Social Sciences, Institut for Statskundskab, Department of Political Science and Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green-Pedersen, C., & Stubager, R. (2010). The Political Conditionality of Mass Media Influence: When do Parties Follow Mass Media Attention? British Journal of Political Science, 40(3), 663–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hjarvard, S. (2008). The Mediatization of Society. Nordicom Review, 29(2), 105–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, B. D., & Wolfe, M. (2010). Public Policy and the Mass Media: An Information Processing Approach. In K. Voltmer & S. Koch-Baumgarten (Eds.), Public Policy and Mass Media: The Interplay of Mass Communication and Political Decision Making (pp. 17–43). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, J. W. (1984). Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinnijenhuis, J., & Rietberg, E. (1995). Parties, Media, the Public and the Economy: Patterns of Societal Agenda-setting. European Journal of Political Research, 28, 95–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch-Baumgarten, S., & Voltmer, K. (2010). The Interplay of Mass Communication and Political Decision Making — Policy Matters! In K. Voltmer & S. Koch-Baumgarten (Eds.), Public Policy and Mass Media: The Interplay of Mass Communication and Political Decision Making (pp. 215–227). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landerer, N. (2013). Rethinking the Logics: A Conceptual Framework for the Mediatization of Politics. Communication Theory, 23(3), 239–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landry, R., Varone, F., Laamary, M., & Pesant, M. (1997). What Sets the Policy Agenda? The Media Agenda or the Party Agenda? Empirical Evidence on the Societal Agenda. Unpublished paper, Université de Laval, Quebec.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linsky, M. (1986). Impact: How the Press Affects Federal Policymaking. New York: W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzoleni, G. (2008). Mediatization of Politics. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication (pp. 3047–3051). Maiden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzoleni, G., & Schulz, W. (1999). Mediatization of Politics: A Challenge for Democracy. Political Communication, 16, 247–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCombs, M. E. (2004). Setting the Agenda: The Mass Media and Public Opinion. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCombs, M. E., & Shaw, D. (1972). The Agenda-setting Function of the Mass Media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 69(4), 813–824.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, T. (2002). Media Democracy: How the Media Colonize Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Midtbø, T., Walgrave, S., Van Aelst, P., & Christensen, D. A. (2014). Do the Media Set the Agenda of Parliament or Is It the Other Way Around? Agenda Interactions between MPs and Mass Media. In K. Deschouwer & S. Depauw (Eds.), Political Representation in the Twenty-First Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrocik, J. R. (1996). Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study. American Journal of Political Science, 40(3), 825–850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, D. (1992). The News Media and Public Policy Agendas. In D. Kennamer (Ed.), Public Opinion, The Press and Public Policy (pp. 103–112). Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, D., & Berkowitz, D. (1993). The Limits of Agenda-setting: The Press and Political Responses to Crime in the United States, 1950–1980. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 5(1), 86–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Protess, D. L., Cook, F. L., Curtin, T. R., Gordon, M. T., Leff, D. R., McCombs, M. E., & Miller, P. (1987). The Impact of Investigative Reporting on Public Opinion and Policymaking: Targeting Toxic Waste. Public Opinion Quarterly, 51, 166–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reich, Z. (2006). The Process Model of News Initiative: Sources Lead, Reporters Thereafter. Journalism Studies, 7(4), 497–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M., & Dearing, J. W. (1988). Agenda Setting Research: Where Has It Been? Where Is It Going? In J. Anderson (Ed.), Communication Yearbook (Vol. 11, pp. 555–594). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The Semi-Sovereign People. New York: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, W. (2004). Reconstructing Mediatization as an Analytical Concept. European Journal of Communication, 19(1), 87–101. doi: 10.1177/0267323104040696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sellers, P. (2010). Cycles of Spin: Strategic Communication in the US Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker, P. J. (1991). Communication Concepts 3: Gatekeeping. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soroka, S. N. (2002a). Agenda-settting Dynamics in Canada. Vancouver: UBC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soroka, S. N. (2002b). Issue Attributes and Agenda-setting by Media, the Public, and Policymakers in Canada. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 14(3), 264–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soroka, S. N. (2006). Good News and Bad News: Asymmetric Responses to Economic Information. Journal of Politics, 68(2), 372-385. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00413.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strömbäck, J. (2008). Four Phases of Mediatization: An Analysis of the Mediatization of Politics. International Journal of Press Politics, 13(3), 228–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strömbäck, J. (2011). Mediatization and Perceptions of the Media’s Political Influence. Journalism Studies, 12(4), 423–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strömbäck, J., & Dimitrova, D. V. (2011). Mediatization and Media Interventionism: A Comparative Analysis of Sweden and the United States. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 16(1), 30–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strömbäck, J., & Esser, F. (2009). Shaping Politics: Mediatization and Media Interventionism. In K. Lundby (Ed.), Mediatization. Concept, Changes, Consequences (pp. 205–224). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strömbäck, J., & Nord, L. W. (2006). Do Politicians Lead the Tango? European Journal of Communication, 21(2), 147–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strömbäck, J., & Van Aelst, P. (2013). Why Political Parties Adapt to the Media: Exploring the Fourth Dimension of Mediatization. International Communication Gazette, 75(4), 341–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thesen, G. (2011). Attack and Defend! Explaining Party Responses to News. Phd thesis, Aarhus University, Forlaget Politica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thesen, G. (2012). Political Agenda-setting and the Mediatization of Politics: How the Media Affect Political Issue Attention & Party Competition. Paper presented at the Comparative Policy Agendas Conference, Reims, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thesen, G. (2013a). When Good News Is Scarce and Bad News Is Good: Government Responsibilities and Opposition Possibilities in Political Agenda-setting. European Journal of Political Research, 52(3), 364–389. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2012.02075.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thesen, G. (2013b). Political Agenda Setting as Mediatized Politics? Media-Politics Interactions from a Party and Issue Competition Perspective. The International Journal of Press/Politics. doi: 10.1177/1940161213515756.

  • Thompson, J. B. (2000). Political Scandal: Power and Visibility in the Media Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trumbo, C. W. (1995). Longitudinal Modelling of Public Issues: An Application of the Agenda-setting Process to the Issue of Global Warming. Journalism and Mass Communication Monographs, 152(2): 1–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Aelst, P., Brants, K., Van Praag, P., De Vreese, C., Nuytemans, M., & Van Dalen, A. (2008). The Fourth Estate as Superpower? An Empirical Study on Perceptions of Media Power in Belgium and the Netherlands. Journalism Studies, 9(4), 494–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Aelst, P., & Walgrave, S. (2011). Minimal or Massive? The Political Agenda Setting Power of the Mass Media According to Different Methods. International Journal of Press Politics, 16(3), 295–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Belle, D. A. (2003). Bureaucratic Responsiveness to the News Media: Comparing the Influence of the New York Times and Network Television News Coverage on US Foreign Aid Allocations. Political Communication, 20(3), 263–285. doi: 10.1080/10584600390218896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dalen, A., & Van Aelst, P. (2014). The Media as Political Agenda-Setters: Journalists’ Perceptions of Media Power in Eight West European Countries. West European Politics, 37(1), 42–64. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2013.814967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Noije, L., Oegema, D., & Kleinnijenhuis, J. (2008). Loss of Parliamentary Control Due to Mediatization and Europeanization: A Longitudinal and Cross-sectional Analysis of Agenda Building in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. British Journal of Political Science, 38(3), 455–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Praag, P., & Brants, K. (1999). The 1998 Campaign: An Interaction Approach. Acta Politica, 34(2–3), 179–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vliegenthart, R., & Walgrave, S. (2011a). Content Matters: The Dynamic of Parliamentary Questioning in Belgium and Denmark. Comparative Political Studies, 44(8), 1031–1059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vliegenthart, R., & Walgrave, S. (2011b). When the Media Matter for Politics: Partisan Moderators of Mass Media Influence on Parliament in Belgium, 1993–2000. Party Politics, 17(3), 321–342. doi: doi:10.1177/1354068810366016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walgrave, S., & Lefevere, J. (2010). Do the Media Shape Agenda Preferences? In K. Voltmer & S. Koch-Baumgarten (Eds.), Public Policy and Mass Media: The Interplay of Mass Communication and Political Decision Making (pp. 44–64). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walgrave, S., Soroka, S., & Nuytemans, M. (2008). The Mass Media’s Political Agenda-setting Power: A Longitudinal Analysis of Media, Parliament and Government in Belgium (1993–2000). Comparative Political Studies, 41(6), 814–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walgrave, S., & Van Aelst, P. (2006). The Contingency of the Mass Media’s Political Agenda-setting Power: Towards a Preliminary Theory. Journal of Communication, 56(1), 88–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walgrave, S., Van Aelst, P., & Bennett, L. (2010). Beyond Agenda-setting: Towards a Broader Theory of Agenda Interactions between Individual Political Actors and the Mass Media. Paper presented at the APSA Annual Meeting, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanta, W., & Foote, J. (1994). The President-news Media Relationship: A Time Series Analysis of Agenda-setting. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 38(4), 437–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfsfeld, G. (2011). Making Sense of Media & Politics. Five Principles of Political Communication. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfsfeld, G., & Sheafer, T. (2006). Competing Actors and the Construction of Political News: The Contest over Waves in Israel. Political Communication, 23, 333–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yanovitsky, I. (2002). Effects of News Coverage on Policy Attention and Actions: A Closer Look into the Media-policy Connection. Communication Research, 29, 422–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeh, R., & Hopmann, D. N. (2013). Indicating Mediatization? Two Decades of Election Campaign Television Coverage. European Journal of Communication, 28(3), 225–240. doi: 10.1177/0267323113475409

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Peter Van Aelst, Gunnar Thesen, Stefaan Walgrave and Rens Vliegenthart

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Van Aelst, P., Thesen, G., Walgrave, S., Vliegenthart, R. (2014). Mediatization and Political Agenda-Setting: Changing Issue Priorities?. In: Esser, F., Strömbäck, J. (eds) Mediatization of Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137275844_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics