Skip to main content

Employee-Driven Innovation: Operating in a Chiaroscuro

  • Chapter
Employee-Driven Innovation

Abstract

As of 2010, six of the ten most innovative companies in the world were American, two were Japanese and one was Korean. None were European. Three years before, in 2007, the situation in the Old World had been hardly any brighter; according to the European Innovation Scoreboard, the innovation index stood at 0.73 in Sweden, 0.59 in Germany and 0.47 in France. In the same year, the World Intellectual Property Organization listed the number of patents lodged by country. Sweden’s 1,287, Germany’s 17,739 and France’s 12,112 were dwarfed by the USA’s 157,283 and Japan’s 164,954. It seems undeniable that many Western countries are still a long way behind and that closing the innovation gap remains a kind of quest for the Holy Grail in terms of competitiveness and employment. However, on closer inspection, the keys to Paradise are more like a safety device both for national economies and for the men and women who implement innovations on a day-to-day level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Akrich, M., Callon, M. and Latour, B. (1988). ‘A quoi tiennent le succès des innovations’. Annales des Mines, Série Gérer et Comprendre, 11–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alter, N. (2000). L’innovation ordinaire. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basso, O., Fayolle, A. and Bouchard, V. (2009). ‘L’orientation entrepreneuriale: Histoire de la formation d’un concept’. Revue Française de Gestion, 5(195).

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, L. (1983). Relationship Marketing. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boussard, V. and Maugeri, S. (Eds) (2003). Du politique dans les organisations. Paris: L’Harmattan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broustail, J. and Fréry, F. (Eds) (1993). Le management stratégique de l’innovation. Dalloz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. (1994). ‘L’innovation technologie et ses mythes’. Annales des Mines, Série Gérer et Comprendre, 34: 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desrosières, A. (2000). La politique des grands nombres. Histoire de la raison statistique. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durieux, C. (2000). De la théorie linguistique à la théorie interprétative. Épistémologie de la règle de trois, Cahiers de la MRSH, Presses universitaires de Caen, 11–19, 85–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. and Graebner, M. (2007). ‘Theory Building from Cases: Opportunities and Challenges’. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1): 25–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellström, P.-E. (2006). ‘Two logics of learning’. In Antonacopoulou, E., Jarvis, P., Andersen, V., Elkjaer, B, and Høyrup, S. (Eds) Learning, working and living. Mapping the terrain of working life learning. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmholdt, C. (2006). ‘Innovative learning is not enough’. In Antonacopoulou, E., Jarvis, P., Andersen, V., Elkjaer, B, and Høyrup, S. (Eds) Learning, working and living. Mapping the terrain of working life learning. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, A. (1987). ‘The post-it note: an Intrapreneurial Success’. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 52(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel, A. and Weil, B. (1994). ‘L’expert et le système, suivi de quatre histoires de systèmes-experts’. Revue française de sociologie, 35(35–1): 137–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Høyrup, S. (2006). ‘Reflection in learning at work’. In Antonacopoulou, E., Jarvis, P., Andersen, V., Elkjaer, B, and Høyrup, S. (Eds) Learning, working and living. Mapping the terrain of working life learning. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Høyrup, S. (2010). ‘Employee driven innovation and workplace learning: basic concepts, approaches and themes’. Transfer, 16(2): 143–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1991). Nous n’avons jamais été modernes. Essai d’anthropologie symétrique. Paris: La Découverte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Letiche, H. (2009). ‘The dark side of organizational knowing’. E: CO, Forthcoming, 11(3), 59–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • LO (2007). Employee-driven-innovation-a trade union priority for growth and job creation in a globalised economy. Copenhagen: LO publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Bennington, G. and Massumi, B. (trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moisdon, J.-C. (1997). Du mode d’existence des outils de gestion. Paris: Seli Arslam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moisdon, J.-C. (2003). Sur la largeur des mailles du filet: savoirs incomplets et gourvernement des organisations. Gouvernement, organisation et gestion: l’héritage de Michel Foucault. Laval: Les Presses de l’Université Laval.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieuwenhuis, L. (2002). Innovation and learning in agriculture. Journal of European Industrial training, 26(6): 283–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynaud, E. (2003). Quand l’environnement devient stratégique. Session semi-plénière, Congrès de l’Association Internationale de Management Stratégique, June, Université de Tunis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serres, M. and Latour, B. (1995) Conversations on Science, Culture, and Time. The University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siggelkow, N. (2007). Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1): 25–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Supiot, A. (2010). L’esprit de Philadelphie-la justice sociale face au marché total. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teglborg, A.-C. (2010). Les dispositifs d’innovation participatives. Une reconception réflexive à l’usage. Ecole doctorale Paris I — IAE de Paris — HEC Paris, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughn, B.E. (1999). ‘Power is knowledge (and vice versa): A commentary on “Winning some and losing some”: A social relations approach to social dominance in toddlers’. Merrill- Palmer Quarterly, 45, 215–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R.K. (1989). Case study research: Design and methods (rev. edn). Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Maria Bonnafous-Boucher and Céline Viala

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Teglborg, AC., Redien-Collot, R., Bonnafous-Boucher, M., Viala, C. (2012). Employee-Driven Innovation: Operating in a Chiaroscuro. In: Høyrup, S., Bonnafous-Boucher, M., Hasse, C., Lotz, M., Møller, K. (eds) Employee-Driven Innovation. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137014764_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics