Abstract
As of 2010, six of the ten most innovative companies in the world were American, two were Japanese and one was Korean. None were European. Three years before, in 2007, the situation in the Old World had been hardly any brighter; according to the European Innovation Scoreboard, the innovation index stood at 0.73 in Sweden, 0.59 in Germany and 0.47 in France. In the same year, the World Intellectual Property Organization listed the number of patents lodged by country. Sweden’s 1,287, Germany’s 17,739 and France’s 12,112 were dwarfed by the USA’s 157,283 and Japan’s 164,954. It seems undeniable that many Western countries are still a long way behind and that closing the innovation gap remains a kind of quest for the Holy Grail in terms of competitiveness and employment. However, on closer inspection, the keys to Paradise are more like a safety device both for national economies and for the men and women who implement innovations on a day-to-day level.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Akrich, M., Callon, M. and Latour, B. (1988). ‘A quoi tiennent le succès des innovations’. Annales des Mines, Série Gérer et Comprendre, 11–12.
Alter, N. (2000). L’innovation ordinaire. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Basso, O., Fayolle, A. and Bouchard, V. (2009). ‘L’orientation entrepreneuriale: Histoire de la formation d’un concept’. Revue Française de Gestion, 5(195).
Berry, L. (1983). Relationship Marketing. Chicago: American Marketing Association, 146.
Boussard, V. and Maugeri, S. (Eds) (2003). Du politique dans les organisations. Paris: L’Harmattan.
Broustail, J. and Fréry, F. (Eds) (1993). Le management stratégique de l’innovation. Dalloz.
Callon, M. (1994). ‘L’innovation technologie et ses mythes’. Annales des Mines, Série Gérer et Comprendre, 34: 5–17.
Desrosières, A. (2000). La politique des grands nombres. Histoire de la raison statistique. Paris: La Découverte.
Durieux, C. (2000). De la théorie linguistique à la théorie interprétative. Épistémologie de la règle de trois, Cahiers de la MRSH, Presses universitaires de Caen, 11–19, 85–95.
Eisenhardt, K. and Graebner, M. (2007). ‘Theory Building from Cases: Opportunities and Challenges’. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1): 25–32.
Ellström, P.-E. (2006). ‘Two logics of learning’. In Antonacopoulou, E., Jarvis, P., Andersen, V., Elkjaer, B, and Høyrup, S. (Eds) Learning, working and living. Mapping the terrain of working life learning. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Elmholdt, C. (2006). ‘Innovative learning is not enough’. In Antonacopoulou, E., Jarvis, P., Andersen, V., Elkjaer, B, and Høyrup, S. (Eds) Learning, working and living. Mapping the terrain of working life learning. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fry, A. (1987). ‘The post-it note: an Intrapreneurial Success’. SAM Advanced Management Journal, 52(3).
Hatchuel, A. and Weil, B. (1994). ‘L’expert et le système, suivi de quatre histoires de systèmes-experts’. Revue française de sociologie, 35(35–1): 137–139.
Høyrup, S. (2006). ‘Reflection in learning at work’. In Antonacopoulou, E., Jarvis, P., Andersen, V., Elkjaer, B, and Høyrup, S. (Eds) Learning, working and living. Mapping the terrain of working life learning. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Høyrup, S. (2010). ‘Employee driven innovation and workplace learning: basic concepts, approaches and themes’. Transfer, 16(2): 143–154.
Latour, B. (1991). Nous n’avons jamais été modernes. Essai d’anthropologie symétrique. Paris: La Découverte.
Letiche, H. (2009). ‘The dark side of organizational knowing’. E: CO, Forthcoming, 11(3), 59–70.
LO (2007). Employee-driven-innovation-a trade union priority for growth and job creation in a globalised economy. Copenhagen: LO publishing.
Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Bennington, G. and Massumi, B. (trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Moisdon, J.-C. (1997). Du mode d’existence des outils de gestion. Paris: Seli Arslam.
Moisdon, J.-C. (2003). Sur la largeur des mailles du filet: savoirs incomplets et gourvernement des organisations. Gouvernement, organisation et gestion: l’héritage de Michel Foucault. Laval: Les Presses de l’Université Laval.
Nieuwenhuis, L. (2002). Innovation and learning in agriculture. Journal of European Industrial training, 26(6): 283–291.
Reynaud, E. (2003). Quand l’environnement devient stratégique. Session semi-plénière, Congrès de l’Association Internationale de Management Stratégique, June, Université de Tunis.
Serres, M. and Latour, B. (1995) Conversations on Science, Culture, and Time. The University of Michigan Press.
Siggelkow, N. (2007). Persuasion with case studies. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1): 25–32.
Supiot, A. (2010). L’esprit de Philadelphie-la justice sociale face au marché total. Paris: Seuil.
Teglborg, A.-C. (2010). Les dispositifs d’innovation participatives. Une reconception réflexive à l’usage. Ecole doctorale Paris I — IAE de Paris — HEC Paris, Paris.
Vaughn, B.E. (1999). ‘Power is knowledge (and vice versa): A commentary on “Winning some and losing some”: A social relations approach to social dominance in toddlers’. Merrill- Palmer Quarterly, 45, 215–225.
Yin, R.K. (1989). Case study research: Design and methods (rev. edn). Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publishing.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2012 Maria Bonnafous-Boucher and Céline Viala
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Teglborg, AC., Redien-Collot, R., Bonnafous-Boucher, M., Viala, C. (2012). Employee-Driven Innovation: Operating in a Chiaroscuro. In: Høyrup, S., Bonnafous-Boucher, M., Hasse, C., Lotz, M., Møller, K. (eds) Employee-Driven Innovation. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137014764_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137014764_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-32645-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-01476-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Business & Management CollectionBusiness and Management (R0)