Skip to main content

The Power of Partnership: States and Solidarities in the Global Era

  • Chapter

Abstract

We live in an age of profound transformations. Global economic pressures, the digital revolution and major shifts in family structure show us that contemporary Western societies are significantly different to those of previous generations. The sociologists tell us that this shift in traditional attachments is matched by a new drive for personal identity:

…the social order of the national state, class, ethnicity and the traditional family is in decline. The ethic of individual self-fulfilment and achievement is the most powerful current in modern society.

(Beck, 2000: 165)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Arthur, W. Brian (1989) ‘Competing Technologies and Lock-in by Historical Events’, Economic Journal, 99, March, 116–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, W. Brian (1994) Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (2001) ‘Special Article – Manufacturing in the Twentieth Century’, Year Book Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (2005) Labour Force, Australia, Detailed: Table 05. Employed Persons by State and Industry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, Robert (1984) The Evolution of Cooperation, New York, Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balloch, Susan and Marilyn Taylor (2001) ‘Conclusion – Can Partnership Work?’ in Balloch and Taylor (eds), Partnership Working: Policy and Practice, Bristol, The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, H. (2005) Playford Food Alliance, Final Report, January 2004 – June 2005, Health Promotion S.A., Department of Health, Adelaide.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Zygmunt (1989) Modernity and the Holocaust, Cambridge, Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1993), Postmodern Ethics, Oxford, Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Ulrich (2000) ‘Living Your Life in a Runaway World: Individualisation, Globalisation and Politics’, in Will Hutton and Anthony Giddens (eds), On the Edge: Living with Global Capitalism, London, Jonathan Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendor, J. and D. Mukherjee (1987) ‘Institutional Structure and the Logic of Ongoing Collective Action’, American Political Science Review, 81, 129–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benington, John and Mike Geddes (2001) ‘Introduction: Social Exclusion, Partnership and Local Governance – New Problems, New Policy Discourses in the European Union’, in Geddes, Mike and John Benington (eds), Local Partnerships and Social Exclusion in the European Union, London, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, J. Kenneth (1975) ‘The Interorganisational Network as a Political Economy’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 20 (2), 22–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, Neil (2003) ‘Public-Private Partnership? Shifting Paradigms of Economic Governance in Ontario’, Canadian Journal of Political Science, 36 (5), 1005–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles, D. and P. Benneworth (2001) ‘Clustering and Economic Complexity: Regional ICT Clusters in the United Kingdom’, in OECD, Innovative Clusters: Drivers of National Innovation Systems, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, R. H. (1960) ‘The Problem of Social Cost’, Journal of Law and Economics, 3, 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coles, B. (2000) Joined-up Research, Policy and Practice: A New Agenda for Change? Leicester, Youth Work Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission on Public Private Partnerships (2001) ‘Final Report — Building Better Partnerships’, Institute for Public Policy Research, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Considine Mark (2001) Enterprising States: The Public Management of Welfare to Work, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Considine, Mark (2002) ‘The End of the Line? Accountable Governance in the Age of Networks, Partnerships and Joined-Up Services’, Governance, 15 (1), January, 21–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, Colin and Henry Farrell (2002) ‘Breaking the Path of Institutional Development? Alternatives to the New Determinism’, European University Institute, Working Paper, SPS 2002/4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Transport, Local Government and the Regions (2002) ‘Collaboration and Coordination in Area-based Initiatives’, DTLR, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebbinghaus, B. and P. Manow (eds) (2001) Comparing Welfare Capitalism Social Policy and Political Economy in Europe, Japan and the USA, London, New York, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, John, (1983) Explaining Technical Change, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, John (1989) Solomonic Judgements, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, Gosta (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2001) ‘Peer Review, Territorial Pacts in Austria: Joint Use of Opportunities’, Vienna, May 10–11, DG EMPL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feigenbaum, Harvey (1995) ‘Review of Robert Putnam, Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy’, Governance, 8 (3), 436–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forschner, Michael (2001) ‘Territorial Employment Pacts in Austria: Mainstreaming and Devolution’, Discussion Paper, in EU (2001), Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geddes, Mike (2001) ‘Local Partnerships and Social Exclusion in the United Kingdom — a Stake in the Market?’ in Geddes, M. and J. Benington (eds), Local Partnerships and Social Exclusion in the European Union – New Forms of Social Governance? London, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genoff, R. and C. Atkinson (2002) ‘Addressing Environmental, Economic and Social Regeneration in the Northern Adelaide Region’, Sustaining our Communities Conference, Adelaide, The Regional Institute Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giguère, Sylvain (2003) ‘Managing Decentralisation and New Forms of Governance’, in OECD, Managing Decentralisation: A New Role for Labour Market Policy, Paris, pp. 11–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodin, R.E. (ed.) (1996) The Theory of Institutional Design, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, Mark, (1985) ‘Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness’, American Journal of Sociology, 91 (November), 481–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guger, Alios (1998) ‘Economic Policy and Social Democracy: The Austrian Experience’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 14 (1), 40–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, Garrett (1968) ‘The Tragedy of the Commons’, Science, 162, 1243–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hess, Michael and David Adams (2005) ‘Localisation in Contemporary Public Management’ in Paul Smyth, Tim Reddel and Andrew Jones (eds), Community and Local Governance in Australia, Sydney, University of NSW Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office (2001) ‘Report of the Independent Review Team: Building Cohesive Communities’, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, N. (2004) The ‘New North’ Awakens, Australian Financial Review, 15 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, Evelyne and John D. Stephens (2001) ‘Welfare State and Production Regimes in the Era of Retrenchment’ in Paul Pierson (ed.), The New Politics of the Welfare State, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 107–45.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Katzenstein, Peter J. (1985) Small States in World Markets: Industrial Policy in Europe, Ithaca, NY, Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kickert, W. (1995) ‘Steering at a Distance: A New Paradigm of Public Governance in Dutch Higher Education’, Governance, 8 (1), 135–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klijn, Erik-Hans (1997) ‘Regels in beleidsnetwerken: de institutionele context van beleid’, Quoted in W. J. M Kickert et al. (eds), Managing Complex Networks, London, Sage, p. 103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koka, Balaji, R. and John E. Prescott (2002) ‘Strategic Alliances as Social Capital: A Multidimensional View’, Strategic Management Journal, 23, May, 795–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, J. (2003) Governing as Governance, London, Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, Stephen D. (1983) ‘Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables’ in Krasner (ed.), International Regimes, Ithaca, Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasch, Christopher (1995) Revolt of the Elites and the Betrayal of Democracy, New York, W.W. Norton and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, Arend (1968) The Politics of Accommodation: Pluralism and Democracy in the Netherlands, Berkeley, University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, Nan (2001) Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Linder, Stephen H. and Pauline Vaillancourt Rosenau (2000) ‘Mapping the Terrain of the Public-Private Policy Partnership’ in Rosenau (ed.), Public–Private Policy Partnerships, Cambridge MA, MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S. M and S. Rokkan (1967) Party Systems and Voter Alignments, New York, Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubell, Mark (2004) ‘Collaborative Institutions: All Talk and No Action?’ Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23 (3), Summer, 549–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig-Mayerhoffer, Wolfgang and Angela Wroblewski (2004), ‘Eppur si Muove? Activation Policies in Austria and Germany’, European Societies, 6 (4), 485–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, D. (1998) ‘The Genesis and Evolution of the Irish State’s Commitment to Social Partnership at the Local Level’, in Kirby, P. and D. Jacobsen (eds), In the Shadow of the Tiger: New Approaches to Combating Social Exclusion, Dublin, DCU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, Douglass (1990) Institutions, Institutional Changes and Economic Performance, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • North, Douglass (1993) ‘Economic Performance Through Time’, Lecture to the memory of Alfred Nobel, 9th December, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1993) Partnerships: The Key to Job Creation, Experiences from OECD Countries, Paris, OECD Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2001a) The Well-being of Nations: the Role of Human and Social Capital, Paris, OECD Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2001b) Local Partnerships for Better Governance, Paris, OECD Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2003a) Managing Decentralisation: A New Role for Labour Market Policy, Paris, OECD Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2003b) Economic Survey – Austria, ‘Issues in Fostering Labour Force Participation and Employment’, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offe, Claus (1991) ‘Review: The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism’, American Journal of Sociology, 96 (6), 1555–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, Mancur (1965) The Logic of Collective Action, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, D. and T. Gaebler (1992) Re-inventing Government, Reading, MA, Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, Elinor (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, New York, Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, Elinor (1992) ‘Policy Analysis of Collective Action and Self-Governance’, in William N. Dunn and Rita Mae Kelly (eds), Advances in Policy Studies Since 1950, 81–119. Policy Studies Review Annual, vol. 10. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pichelmann, Karl and Helmut Hofer (1999) ‘Country Employment Policy Reviews: Austria’, Report Symposium on Social Dialogue and Employment Success, 2–3 March, Geneva, ILO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, Paul and Theda Skocpol (2002) ‘Historical Institutionalism and Contemporary Political science’, in Helen Milner and Ira Katznelson (eds), The State of the Discipline, New York, W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, Paul (2000) ‘Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics’, American Political Science Review, 94 (2), 251–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, Paul (ed.) (2001) The New Politics of the Welfare State, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, Paul (2004) Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. and G. R. Salancik (1978) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective, New York, Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, Martin (2001) ‘The Political Economy of Social Pacts: Competitive Corporatism and European Welfare Reforms’, in Pierson, Paul (ed.), The New Politics of the Welfare State, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 165–97.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. W. and D. Marsh (1992) ‘Policy Networks in British Politics: a Critique of Existing Approaches’, in Rhodes and Marsh (eds), Policy Networks in British Government, Oxford, Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996) ‘The New Governance: Governing without Government’, Political Studies Association, 44 (4), 652–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandeman, P. (2002) ‘The Playford Partnership — Community Capacity Building in Action’, Impact: News Monthly of the Australian Council of Social Services, May 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarason, Seymour B., Charles F. Carroll, Kenneth Matson, Saul Cohen and Elisabeth Lorentz (1977), Human Services and Resource Networks: Rationale, Possibilities and Public Policy, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, Mark, John Scholz, Mark Lubell, Denisa Mindruta and Matthew Edwardsen (2003) ‘Building Consensual Institutions: Networks and the National Estuary Program’, American Journal of Political Science, 47 (1), January, 143–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Herbert (1969) The Sciences of the Artificial, Cambridge, MA, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, E. and J. Tørfing (2005) ‘The Democratic Anchorage of Governance Networks’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 28 (3), 195–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, Murray (2003) ‘Tackling the Challenge of Policy Integration’ in OECD, 2003a, Managing Decentralisation: A New Role for Labour Market Policy, Paris, OECD Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, Joseph E. and Scott J. Wallsten (2000) ‘Public-Private Technology Partnerships: Promises and Pitfalls’, in Vaillancourt Rosenau, Pauline (ed.), Public-Private Policy Partnerships, Cambridge, MA, The MIT Press, pp. 37–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stutchbury, M. (1984) ‘The Playford Legend and the Industrialisation of South Australia’, Australian Economic History Review, 1, March, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, Helen and Chris Skelcher (2002) Working Across Boundaries: Collaboration in Public Services, Houndmills, Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Michael (1982) Community, Anarchy and Liberty, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Michael and S.G. Singleton (1993) ‘The communal resource: Transaction costs and the solution of collective action problems’, Political Science, 21, 195–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trainor, P. (2006) ‘Innovative Governance in a Metropolitan Context? The Case of the Office of the North’, State of Australian Cities Conference, Brisbane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, Jim (2001) ‘Catalysts for Change: Public Policy Reform through Local Partnerships in Ireland’, in Geddes, M. and J. Benington (eds), Local Partnerships and Social Exclusion in the European Union – New Forms of Social Governance? London, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, K. (1995) Public Services and Market Mechanisms. Competition, Contracting and the New Public Management, Houndsmills, Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkins, P. (2002) ‘Accountability and Joined-up Government’, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 61 (1), March, 114–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolcock, Michael (2001) ‘The Place of Social Capital in Understanding Social and Economic Outcomes’, ISUMA, Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 2 (1), Spring, 11–17.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2008 Mark Considine

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Considine, M. (2008). The Power of Partnership: States and Solidarities in the Global Era. In: Considine, M., Giguère, S. (eds) The Theory and Practice of Local Governance and Economic Development. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230582682_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics