Skip to main content

Performativity and Emergence of Institutions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Enacting Dismal Science

Part of the book series: Perspectives from Social Economics ((PSE))

Abstract

The article argues that performativity theory can shed light on the process of emergence of institutions. This process is not strictly constitutive: Institutions such as a new state, a new political party, or a firm do not appear at the very moment when somebody declares them as existent. There is always a time lag between the words (declaration) and an emergence of a social fact. In between, processes of persuasion, becoming accepted, that is, processes of formation of common beliefs and expectations, take place. Those processes refer to the perlocutionary aspects of speech acts and are theatrical in nature. Performativity is always about performance (theatricality of language). At the heart of performativity is not the question of how economists form economy but the question of how economic phenomena come into being in the processes of joint staging of fictions and making believe.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 27.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aoki, Masahiko. 2007. Endogenizing Institutions and Institutional Changes. Journal of Institutional Economics 3(1): 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, John. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. The William James Lectures Delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, Barry. 1983. Social Life as Bootstrapped Induction. Sociology 17(4): 524–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckert, Jens. 2005. Trust and the Performative Construction of Markets. MPIfG Discussion Paper, 05/8. Accessed September 22, 2015. http://www.mpifg.de/pu/mpifg_dp/dp05-8.pdf

  • Beckert, Jens. 2013. Imagined Futures: Fictional Expectations in the Economy. Theory and Society 42(3): 219–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessy, Christian. 2002. Représentation, Convention et Institution. Des repères pour l’Économie des conventions. Document de travail 20. Paris: CNRS/CEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biehl-Missal, Briggite. 2011. Business is Show Business: Management Presentations as Performance. Journal of Management Studies 48(3): 619–645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, David. 1997. Wittgenstein, Rules and Institutions. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, David. 2000. Collective Representations as Social Institutions. In Durkheim and Representations, edited by W. Pickering London, 157–166. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloor, David. 2013. PerformativeTheory of Institutions. In Encyclopedia of Philosophy and the Social Sciences 16, edited by Byron Kaldis, 706–709. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehm, Stephan. 2002. The Ramifications of John Searle’s Social Philosophy in Economics. Journal of Economic Methodology 9(1): 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boucher, Geoff. 2014. The Lacanian Performative: Austin after Žižek. In Žižek and Performance, edited by Broderick Chow and Alex Mangold, 13–32. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith. 1997. Excitable Speech. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith. 2010. Performative Agency. Journal of Cultural Economy 3(2): 147–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, Michel. 2007. What Does It Mean to Say that Economics is Performative? In Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, edited by Donald MacKenzie, Fabian Muniesa, and Lucia Siu, 311–357. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Tymothy. 2008. Performing the Organisation: Organisation Theatre and Imaginative Life as Physical Presence. In The SAGE Handbook of New Approaches in Management and Organization, edited by Daved Barry and Hans Hansen, 401–411. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochoy, Franck, Martin Giraudeau, and Liz McFall. 2010. Performativity, Economics and Politics. Journal of Cultural Economy 3(2): 139–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques. 1990. Force de Loi: Le ‘Fondement Mystique de l’Autorité/Force of Law: The ‘Mystical Foundation of Authority’. Cardozo Law Review 11: 919–1045.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques. 1988. Limited Inc. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz-Bone, Reiner. 2012. Elaborating the Conceptual Difference between Conventions and Institutions. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung 37(4): 64–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Didier, Emmanuel. 2007. Do Statistics Perform the Economy? In Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, edited by Donald Mackenzie, Fabian Muniesa, and Lucia Siu, 276–310. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esposito, Elena. 2007. Die Fiktion der Wahrscheinlichen Realität. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer-Lichte, Erika. 2012. Performativität: Eine Einführung. Bielefeld: Transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guala, Francesco. 2007. How to Do Things with Experimental Economics. In Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, edited by Donald MacKenzie, Fabian Muniesa, and Lucia Siu, 128–162. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann-Pillath, Carsten. 2012. Institutions, Distributed Cognition and Agency: Rule-Following as Performative Action. Journal of Economic Methodology 19(1): 21–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindriks, Frank, and Francesco Guala. 2015. Institutions, Rules, and Equilibria: A Unified Theory. Journal of Institutional Economics 11(3): 459–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iser, Wolfgang. 1991. Das Fiktive und das Imaginäre. Perspektiven literarischer Anthropologie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingston, Christopher, and Gonzalo Caballero. 2009. Comparing Theories of Institutional Change. Journal of Institutional Economics 5(2): 151–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krämer, Sybille. 2014. Connecting Performance and Performativity: Does It Work? In Encounters in Performance Philosophy, edited by Laura Cull and Alice Lagaay, 223–237. New Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, David. 1969. Convention: A Philosophical Study. Harvard: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, Donald. 2004. The Big, Bad Wolf and the Rational Market: Portfolio Insurance, the 1987 Crash and the Performativity of Economics. Economy and Society 33(3): 303–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, D. 2007. Is Economics Performative? Option Theory and the Construction of Derivatives Markets. In Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, edited by D. MacKenzie, F. Muniesa, and L. Siu, 54–86. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mäki, Uskali. 2013. Performativity: Saving Austin from MacKenzie. In Perspectives and Foundational Problems in Philosophy of Science, The European Philosophy of Science Association Proceedings, edited by Vassilios Karakostas and Dennis Dieks, 443–453. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Möllering, Guido. 2001. The Nature of Trust: From Georg Simmel to a Theory of Expectation, Interpretation and Suspension. Sociology 35(2): 403–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muniesa, Fabian. 2014. The Provoked Economy: Economic Reality and the Performative Turn. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, Douglass. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, Douglass. 2005. Understanding the Process of Economic Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortmann, Günther. 2004. Als Ob: Fiktionen und Organisationen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priddat, Birger. 2015. Economics of Persuasion: Ökonomie zwischen Markt, Kommunikation und Ãœberzeugung. Marburg: Metropolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Pagés, Santiago, and Stéphane Straub. 2010. The Emergence of Institutions. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy 10(1): 84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, John R. 2001. Social Ontology and the Philosophy of Society. In On the Nature of Social and Institutional Reality, edited by Eerik Lagerspetz, Heikki Ikäheimo, and Jussi Kotkavirta, 15–38. Jyväskylä: SoPhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, John R. 2005. What is an Institution? Journal of Institutional Economics 1(1): 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, Georg. 1990. The Philosophy of Money. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugden, Robert. 1986. The Economics of Rights, Co-operation and Welfare. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugden, Robert. 1989. Spontaneous Order. Journal of Economic Perspectives 3(4): 85–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutrop, Margit. 1996. The Anthropological Turn in the Theory of Fiction: Wolfgang Iser and Kendall Walton. REAL Yearbook of Research in English and American Literature 12: 81–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urpelainen, Johannes. 2011. The Origins of Social Institutions. Journal of Theoretical Politics 23(2): 215–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, Kendall L. 1990. Mimesis as Make-Believe: On the Foundations of the Representational Arts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, Karl. 1995. Sensemaking in Organisations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wettersten, John. 1998. The Analytical Study of Social Ontology: Breakthrough or Cul-de-Sac? Philosophy of the Social Sciences 28(1): 132–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel, Harald. 2001. Die Abenteuer der Kommunikation. Echtzeitmedien und der Handlungsraum der Hochmoderne. Vellbrück: Weilerwist.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, Oliver E. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, Slavoj. 1993. Tarrying with the Negative: Kant, Hegel and the Critique of Ideology. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, Slavoj. 2001. On Belief. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper was first presented at the European Society for the History of Economic Thoughts (ESHET) conference in St. Petersburg in 2012. I thank all participants for the very productive discussion. I also am grateful to Ivan Boldyrev and Birger Priddat for valuable comments and helpful references.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Svetlova, E. (2016). Performativity and Emergence of Institutions. In: Boldyrev, I., Svetlova, E. (eds) Enacting Dismal Science. Perspectives from Social Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48876-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48876-3_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-49210-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-48876-3

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics