Endoscopy 2000; 32(1): 10-19
DOI: 10.1055/s-2000-138
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Analysis of the Risk Factors Associated with Endoscopic Sphincterotomy Techniques: Preliminary Results of a Prospective Study, with Emphasis on the Reduced Risk of Acute Pancreatitis with Low-Dose Anticoagulation Treatment

T. Rabenstein, H. T. Schneider, D. Bulling, M. Nicklas, A. Katalinic, E. G. Hahn, P. Martus, C. Ell
  • Dept. of Medicine I, Institute for Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Germany
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
25 September 2003 (online)

Background and Study Aims: The aim of the present study was to analyze the risk factors associated with complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES).

Patients and Methods: In all consecutive endoscopic sphincterotomies carried out between September 1994 and December 1996, the possible risk factors (12 patient-related factors and 12 procedure-related ones), as well as the concomitant medical treatment, indications, techniques, and success of endoscopic sphincterotomy were evaluated prospectively. Risk factors were analyzed on an exploratory basis using univariate methods. “Potential risk factors” (univariate, P < 0.1) underwent multivariate analysis to determine independent “risk factors” (multivariate, P < 0.05). In addition, the complication rate was calculated according to the number of potential risk factors present.

Results: A total of 438 patients who underwent ES were analyzed. Complications occurred in 7.5 % (n = 33; acute pancreatitis 4.3 %, hemorrhage 2.3 %, cholangitis 0.9 %, technical 0.2 %). Statistical analysis of the complications identified three independent risk factors (coagulopathy, patient age (≤ 60 years, pancreas divisum), and one protective factor (pancreatic duct obstruction). The frequency of acute pancreatitis was increased by two independent risk factors (pancreas divisum, ES frequency < 40 procedures/year) and was reduced if low-dose anticoagulation (unfractionated heparin or low molecular weight heparin) was administered (0.9 %, one of 115 vs. 5.8 %, 18 of 313; P < 0.05). The effect of anticoagulation was not confounded by the presence or absence of other potential risk factors for acute pancreatitis. Neither the risk nor the severity of hemorrhage were increased by low-dose anticoagulation. Due to the low number of events, only potential risk factors for hemorrhage were identified (coagulopathy, intensive-care treatment). The overall complication rate and the incidence of pancreatitis and hemorrhage increased significantly depending on the number of simultaneous potential risk factors present (P < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Patients at risk for complications after endoscopic sphincterotomy can be identified by risk factor analysis. These data suggest the hypothesis that low-dose anticoagulation prior to endoscopic sphincterotomy reduces the risk of acute pancreatitis after sphincterotomy.

References

  • 1 Cotton PB, Lehmann GA, Vennes J, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;  37 338-393
  • 2 Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S, et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy.  N Engl J Med. 1996;  335 909-918
  • 3 Ell C, Rabenstein T, Ruppert T, et al. 20 Jahre endoskopische Papillotomie - Analyse der Erlanger Erfahrungen bei 2752 Patienten.  Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1995;  120 163-167
  • 4 Rabenstein T, Schneider HT, Hahn EG, et al. 25 years of endoscopic sphincterotomy in Erlangen: assessment of experience in the treatment of 3498 patients.  Endoscopy. 1998;  30 (Suppl 2) 201
  • 5 Huibregtse K. Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy and their prevention.  N Engl J Med. 1996;  335 961-963
  • 6 Classen M, Demling L. Endoskopische Sphinkterotomie der Papilla Vateri und Steinextraktion aus dem Ductus choledochus.  Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1974;  99 496-497
  • 7 Kawai KY, Ahasaha K, Murakami M. Endoscopic sphincterotomy of the papilla of Vater.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1974;  20 148-150
  • 8 Riemann JF, Seuberth K, Demling L. Mechanical lithotripsy of common bile duct stones.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1984;  30 140-141
  • 9 Rabenstein T, Ruppert T, Schneider HT, Hahn EG, Ell C. Benefits and risks of needle-knife papillotomy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;  46 207-211
  • 10 Rabenstein T, Schneider HT, Nicklas M, Hahn EG, Ell C. Significance of the endoscopist on success and complications of EST: comparison of experienced and learning endoscopists.   Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  50 628-636
  • 11 Ell C, Rabenstein T, Schneider HT, et al. Safety and efficacy of pancreatic sphincterotomy in chronic pancreatitis.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1998;  48 244-249
  • 12 Classen M. Endoscopic papillotomy. In: Sivak MV (ed). Gastroenterologic endoscopy.  Philadelphia; Saunders, 1987: 631-653
  • 13 Huibregtse K, Katon RM, Tytgat GNJ. Precut papillotomy via fine needle-knife papillotome: a safe and effective technique.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1986;  32 403-405
  • 14 Armitage P, Berry G. Statistical methods in medical research. 3rd ed. Oxford; Blackwell Science 1994: 311
  • 15 Hochberg Y, Tamhane AC (eds). Multiple comparison procedures.  New York; Wiley, 1987
  • 16 Concato J, Feinstein AR, Holford TR. The risk of determining risk with multivariate models.  Ann Intern Med. 1993;  118 201-210
  • 17 Hosmer DW Jr, Lemeshow S (eds). Applied logistic regression.  New York; Wiley, 1989
  • 18 Boender J, Nix GAJJ, de Ridder MAJ, et al. Endoscopic papillotomy for common bile duct stones: factors influencing the complication rate.  Endoscopy. 1994;  26 209-216
  • 19 Lambert ME, Betts CD, Hill J, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy: the whole truth.  Br J Surg. 1991;  78 473-476
  • 20 Sherman S, Ruffolo TA, Hawes RH, Lehman GA. Complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy: a prospective series with emphasis on the increased risk associated with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and nondilated bile ducts.  Gastroenterology. 1991;  101 1068-1075
  • 21 Vaira D, Ainley C, Williams S, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy in 1000 consecutive patients.  Lancet. 1989;  8660 431-434
  • 22 Wojtun S, Gil J, Gietka W, Gil M. Endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis: a prospective single-center study on the short-term and long-term treatment results in 483 patients.  Endoscopy. 1997;  29 258-265
  • 23 Jowell PS, Baillie J, Branch MS, et al. Quantitative assessment of procedural competence: a prospective study of training in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.  Ann Intern Med. 1996;  125 983-989
  • 24 Jowell PS, Branch MS, Afforti J, et al. At least 180 ERCPs are needed to attain competence in diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP [abstract].  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  43 314
  • 25 Freeman ML. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy: a review.  Endoscopy. 1997;  29 228-297
  • 26 Schneider HT, May A, Benninger J, et al. Piezoelectric shock wave lithotripsy of pancreatic duct stones.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1994;  89 2042-2048
  • 27 Cremer M, Devière J, Delhaye M, et al. Stenting in severe chronic pancreatitis: results of medium-term follow-up in seventy-six patients.  Endoscopy. 1991;  23 171-176
  • 28 Kozarek RA, Ball TJ, Patterson DJ, et al. Endoscopic pancreatic duct sphincterotomy: indications, technique and analysis of results.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1994;  40 592-598
  • 29 Smits ME, Rauw EAS, Tytgat GJ, Huibregtse K. Endoscopic treatment of pancreatic stones in patients with chronic pancreatitis.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  43 556-560
  • 30 Dumonceau JM, Devière J, Le Moine O, et al. Endoscopic pancreatic drainage in chronic pancreatitis associated with ductal stones: long-term results.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  43 547-555
  • 31 Slot WB, Schoeman MN, Disario JA, et al. Needle-knife sphincterotomy as a precut procedure: a retrospective evaluation of efficacy and complications.  Endoscopy. 1996;  28 334-339
  • 32 Binmoeller KF, Seifert H, Gerke H, et al. Papillary roof incision using the Erlangen-type pre-cut papillotome to achieve selective bile duct cannulation.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  44 689-695
  • 33 Dowset JF, Polydorou AA, Vaira D, et al. Needle-knife papillotomy: how safe and how effective?.  Gut. 1990;  31 905-908
  • 34 Foutch PG. A prospective assessment of results for needle-knife papillotomy and standard endoscopic sphincterotomy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1995;  41 25-32
  • 35 Baillie J. Needle-knife papillotomy revisited.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;  46 282-284
  • 36 Siegel HJ. Precut papillotomy: a method to improve success of ERCP and papillotomy.  Endoscopy. 1980;  20 130-133
  • 37 Siegel HJ, Ben-Zvi JS, Pullano W. The needle-knife: a valuable tool in diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1989;  35 499-503
  • 38 Vandervoort J, Carr-Locke DL. Needle-knife access papillotomy: an unfairly maligned technique?.  Endoscopy. 1996;  28 365-366
  • 39 Tham TCK, Vandervoort L, Wong RCK, et al. Therapeutic ERCP in outpatients.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1997;  45 225-230
  • 40 Vandervoort J, Tham TCK, Wong RCK, et al. Prospective analysis of risk factors for pancreatitis after diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP [abstract].  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  43 440
  • 41 Vandervoort J, Tham TCK, Wong RCK, et al. Prospective study of post-ERCP complications following diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP [abstract].  Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;  43 441
  • 42 Booth FV, Doerr RJ, Khalafi RS, et al. Surgical management of complications of endoscopic sphincterotomy with precut papillotomy.  Am J Surg. 1990;  159 132-135
  • 43 Tweedle DEF, Martin FF. Needle-knife papillotomy for endoscopic sphincterotomy and cholangiography.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;  37 518-521
  • 44 Shakoor T, Geenen JE. Precut papillotomy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1992;  38 623-627
  • 45 Cotton PB. Precut papillotomy: a risky technique for experts only.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1989;  35 578-579
  • 46 Chen YK, Foliente RL, Santoro MJ, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced pancreatitis: increased risk associated with nondilated bile ducts and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction.  Am J Gastroenterol. 1994;  89 327-333
  • 47 Sherman S, Lehmann GA. ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced pancreatitis.  Pancreas. 1991;  6 350-67
  • 48 Geenen JE, Hogan WJ, Dodds WJ, et al. Long-term results of endoscopic sphincterotomy for treating patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction.  Gastroenterology. 1989;  92 1401-1405
  • 49 Tittobello A. Diagnosis and prevention of post-EST pancreatitis.  Endoscopy. 1997;  29 285-287
  • 50 Toulon P, Chadeuf G, Bouillot JL, et al. Involvement of heparin cofactor II in chymotrypsin neutralization and in pancreatic proteinase-antiproteinase interaction during acute pancreatitis in man.  Eur J Clin Invest. 1991;  21 303-309
  • 51 Kosidlo S, Gabryelewicz A, Prokopowicz J, Prokopowicz K. Pancreatic proteolytic and inhibitory activity during acute experimental pancreatitis in rats with reference to heparin treatment.  Mater Med Pol. 1986;  18 136-143
  • 52 Gabryelewicz A, Kosidlo S, Prokopowicz J, Prokopowicz K. Does heparin modify protease-antiprotease balance in acute experimental pancreatitis in rats?.  Hepatogastroenterology. 1986;  33 79-92
  • 53 Bleeker WK, Agterberg J, Rigter G, et al. Protective effect of antithrombin III in acute experimental pancreatitis in rats.  Dig Dis Sci. 1992;  37 280-285
  • 54 Suda K. Histopathological study on fat necrosis with comparison between agonal stage and acute pancreatitis.  Rinsho Byori. 1991;  39 977-980

M.D. T. Rabenstein

Medizinische Klinik I mit Poliklinik Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg

Krankenhausstrasse 12

91054 Erlangen, Germany

Phone: +49-9131-8536909

Email: Thomas.Rabenstein@med1.med.uni-erlangen.de

    >