Download PDF
Synthesis 2009(23): 3983-3988  
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1217020
PAPER
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart ˙ New York

One-Pot Synthesis of Sulfonamides from Primary and Secondary Amine Derived Sulfonate Salts Using Cyanuric Chloride

Mohammad Navid Soltani Rad*a, Ali Khalafi-Nezhad*b, Zeinab Asrarib, Somayeh Behrouzb, Zohreh Aminia, Marzieh Behrouzb
Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Basic Sciences, Shiraz University of Technology, Shiraz 71555-313, Iran
Fax: +98(711)7354523; e-Mail: soltani@sutech.ac.ir; e-Mail: nsoltanirad@gmail.com;
Department of Chemistry, College of Sciences, Shiraz University, Shiraz 71454, Iran
Further Information

Publication History

Received 9 July 2009
Publication Date:
23 September 2009 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Abstract

A convenient, mild and efficient one-pot synthesis of new sulfonamides is described. The reaction of primary or secondary amine derived sulfonate salts in the presence of cyanuric chloride, triethylamine as base, and anhydrous acetonitrile as solvent at room temperature gives the corresponding sulfonamides in good to excellent yields.

Key words

one-pot reaction - sulfonamides - amine-sulfonate salt - cyanuric chloride - triethylamine

    References

  • 1 Hansch C. Sammes PG. Taylor JB. Comprehensive Medicinal Chemistry   Vol. 2:  Pergamon Press; Oxford: 1990.  Chap. 7.1.
    Google Scholar
  • 2a Kanda Y. Kawanishi Y. Oda K. Sakata T. Mihara S. Asakura K. Kanemasa T. Ninomiya M. Fujimoto M. Kanoike T. Bioorg. Med. Chem.  2001,  9:  897 
    Google Scholar
  • 2b Mincione F. Starnotti M. Menabuoni L. Scozzafava A. Casini A. Supuran CT. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.  2001,  11:  1787 
    Google Scholar
  • 2c Bhusari KP. Khedekar PB. Umathe SN. Bahekar RH. Rao ARR. Indian J. Heterocycl. Chem.  2000,  9:  213 
    Google Scholar
  • 2d Eckenberg P, Reefschläger J, Bender W, Goldmann S, Härter M, Hallenberger S, Keldenich J, Weber O, and Henninger K. inventors;  DE19934272.  ; Chem. Abstr.; 2001, 134, 115865
  • 2e Chibale K. Haupt H. Kendrick H. Yardley V. Saravanamuthu A. Fairlamb AH. Croft SL. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.  2001,  11:  2655 
    Google Scholar
  • 2f Rahavi Ezabadi I. Camoutsis C. Zoumpoulakis P. Geronikaki A. Soković M. Glamočilija J. Čirič A. Bioorg. Med. Chem.  2008,  16:  1150 
    Google Scholar
  • 2g Lavoie R. Bouchain G. Frechette S. Woo SH. Khalil EA. Leit S. Fournel M. Yan PT. Trachy-Bourget M.-C. Beaulieu C. Li Z. Besterman J. Delorme D. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.  2001,  11:  2847 
    Google Scholar
  • 2h Kleeman A. Engel J. Kutscher B. Reichert D. Pharmaceutical Substances   3rd ed.:  Thieme; Stuttgart: 1999. 
    Google Scholar
  • 2i Wilson CO. Gisvold O. Block JH. Wilson and Gisvold"s Textbook of Organic Medicinal and Pharma-ceutical Chemistry   11th ed.:  Block J. Beale JM. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Philadelphia: 2004. 
    Google Scholar
  • 2j Levin JI. Chen JM. Du MT. Nelson FC. Killar LM. Skala S. Sung A. Jin G. Cowling R. Barone D. March CJ. Mohler KM. Black RA. Skotnicki JS. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.  2002,  12:  1199 
    Google Scholar
  • 2k Kim D.-K. Lee JY. Lee N. Ryu DH. Kim J.-S. Lee S. Choi J.-Y. Ryu J.-H. Kim N.-H. Im G.-J. Choi W.-S. Kim T.-K. Bioorg. Med. Chem.  2001,  9:  3013 
    Google Scholar
  • 2l Hu B. Ellingboe J. Han S. Largis E. Lim K. Malamas M. Mulvey R. Niu C. Oliphant A. Pelletier J. Singanallore T. Sum F.-W. Tillett J. Wong V. Bioorg. Med. Chem.  2001,  9:  2045 
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Greene TW. Wuts PGM. Protective Groups in Organic Synthesis   3rd ed.:  John Wiley & Sons; New York: 1999. 
    Google Scholar
  • 4a Yang G.-F. Yang H.-Z. Chin. J. Chem.  1999,  17:  650 
    Google Scholar
  • 4b Srivastava MK. Bull. Chim. Farm.  2000,  139:  161 
    Google Scholar
  • 4c Lehmler H.-J. Chemosphere  2005,  58:  1471 
    Google Scholar
  • 4d Kissa E. Fluorinated Surfactants and Repellents, In Surfactant Science Series   Vol. 97:  Marcel Dekker; New York: 2001. 
    Google Scholar
  • 5a De Boer TJ. Backer HJ. Org. Synth. Coll. Vol. IV  1963,  943 ; Org. Synth. 1954, 34, 96
    Google Scholar
  • 5b Kamal AJ. Reddy S. Bharathi EV. Dastagiri D. Tetrahedron Lett.  2008,  49:  348 
    Google Scholar
  • 5c Yasuhara A. Kameda M. Sakamoto T. Chem. Pharm. Bull.  1999,  47:  809 
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Graham SL. Scholz TH. Synthesis  1986,  852 
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Chan WY. Berthelette C. Tetrahedron Lett.  2002,  43:  4537 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Shaabani A. Soleimani E. Rezayan AH. Tetrahedron Lett.  2007,  48:  2185 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Leontiev AV. Rasika Dias HV. Rudkevich DM. Chem. Commun.  2006,  2887 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Chantarasriwong O. Jang DO. Chavasiri W. Tetrahedron Lett.  2006,  47:  7489 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Caddick S. Wilden JD. Judd DB. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2004,  126:  1024 
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12a Boruah A. Baruah M. Prajapati D. Sandhu JS. Synlett  1997,  1253 
    Google Scholar
  • 12b Iyer S. Sattar AK. Synth. Commun.  1998,  28:  1721 
    Google Scholar
  • 13a Blotny G. Tetrahedron  2006,  62:  9507 
    Google Scholar
  • 13b Giacomelli G. Porcheddu A. De Luca L. Curr. Org. Chem.  2004,  8:  1497 
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Olah GA. Narang SC. Fung AP. Balaram Gupta BG. Synthesis  1980,  657 
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Olah GA. Fung AP. Balaram Gupta BG. Narang SC. Synthesis  1980,  221 
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Rolfe A. Probst DA. Volp KA. Omar I. Flynn DL. Hanson PR. J. Org. Chem.  2008,  73:  8785 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Venkataraman K. Wagle DR. Tetrahedron Lett.  1980,  21:  1893 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 18a Venkataraman K. Wagle DR. Tetrahedron Lett.  1979,  20:  3037 
    Google Scholar
  • 18b Bandgar BP. Pandit SS. Tetrahedron Lett.  2002,  43:  3413 
    Google Scholar
  • 19a Kamiński ZJ. Paneth P. Rudziński J. J. Org. Chem.  1998,  63:  4248 
    Google Scholar
  • 19b Rayle HL. Fellmeth L. Org. Process Res. Dev.  1999,  3:  172 
    Google Scholar
  • 19c Khalafi-Nezhad A. Zare A. Parhami A. Soltani Rad MN. Nejabat GR. Phosphorus, Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem.  2007,  182:  657 
    Google Scholar
  • 20 De Luca L. Giacomelli G. Porcheddu A. Org. Lett.  2001,  3:  1519 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 21 De Luca L. Giacomelli G. Taddi M. J. Org. Chem.  2001,  66:  2534 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Forbes DC. Barrett EJ. Lewis DL. Smith MC. Tetrahedron Lett.  2000,  41:  9943 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Falorni M. Porcheddu A. Taddei M. Tetrahedron Lett.  1999,  40:  4395 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Blotny G. Tetrahedron Lett.  2003,  44:  1499 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Porcheddu A. Giacomelli G. Salaris M. J. Org. Chem.  2005,  70:  2361 
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Furuya Y. Ishihara K. Yamamoto H. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2005,  127:  11240 
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Das B. Venkateswarlu K. Krishnaiah M. Helv. Chim. Acta  2007,  90:  149 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 28a De Luca L. Giacomelli G. Porcheddu A. Org. Lett.  2002,  4:  553 
    Google Scholar
  • 28b De Luca L. Giacomelli G. Porcheddu A. J. Org. Chem.  2002,  67:  5152 
    Google Scholar
  • 29a Sharma GVM. Reddy JJ. Lakshmi PS. Krishna PR. Tetrahedron Lett.  2004,  45:  7729 
    Google Scholar
  • 29b Sharma GVM. Reddy KL. Lakshmi PS. Krishna PR. Synthesis  2006,  55 
    Google Scholar
  • 29c Bigdeli MA. Heravi MM. Mahdavinia GH. Catal. Commun.  2007,  8:  1595 
    Google Scholar
  • 29d Bandgar BP. Joshi NS. Kamble VT. Tetrahedron Lett.  2006,  47:  4775 
    Google Scholar
  • 29e Bigdeli MA. Mahdavinia GH. Jafari S. Hazarkhani H. Catal. Commun.  2007,  8:  2229 
    Google Scholar
  • 30 De Luca L. Giacomelli G. J. Org. Chem.  2008,  73:  3967 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Dmitry KD. Bell AT. Tilley TD. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2005,  127:  12640 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Vogel AI. Practical Organic Chemistry   Longmans, Green and Co.; London: 1954.  Chap. 2. p.161-176  
    Google Scholar
32

The ab initio (6-31G) quantum mechanic calculations were run using Gaussian 98, version 9.2. The semi-empirical Austin Model 1 (AM1) and Parameterized Model 3 (PM3) calculations were run on MOPAC in CS Chem 3D Ultra 8 (2004 Cambridge Soft) and Hyperchem (Hypercube Inc., version 7). The heat of formation (ΔHf) is a parameter used to estimate the stability of molecules in comparison with other related isomers or molecules. The molecule with the lowest ΔHf value is the most stable.

33

The amine-sulfonate salts are prepared as follows: to a soln of amine (1 equiv) in a minimum amount of H2O-MeOH (60:40) was added the sulfonic acid (1 equiv). The reaction was stirred at r.t. for 15 min and the reaction was judged to be complete when pH paper indicated that the soln was neutral. The soln was evaporated under vacuum and the remaining solid was crystallized from hot MeOH. The crystals were dried in a vacuum oven for 24 h at 50 ˚C and then stored in a desiccator.