Elsevier

Clinical Radiology

Volume 55, Issue 1, January 2000, Pages 25-35
Clinical Radiology

RA
Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography and Ultrasound Compared with Direct Cholangiography in the Detection of Choledocholithiasis

https://doi.org/10.1053/crad.1999.0319Get rights and content

Abstract

AIM: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and trans-abdominal ultrasound in the detection of choledocholithiasis, and to compare bile duct stone characteristics using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), MRCP and ultrasound.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Of 191 consecutive patients referred for diagnostic ERCP, choledocholithiasis was diagnosed in 34 patients using direct cholangiography. The latter took the form of ERCP (n = 29), intraoperative cholangiography (n = 3) or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (n = 2). All patients underwent MRCP and ultrasound examinations and their findings for choledocholitiasis were compared with those at direct cholangiography. Finally, in the 29 patients with choledocholithiasis diagnosed under ERCP, stone characteristics were compared across the three investigations of ERCP, MRCP and ultrasound.

RESULTS: Compared with direct cholangiography, MRCP showed a sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of 91%, 98% and 97%, respectively, in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. MRCP resulted in three false-negative and three false-positive findings, four of which occurred due to confusion with lesions at the ampulla. Ultrasound showed a sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of 38%, 100% and 89%, respectively, in the diagnosis of choledocholithiasis. ERCP revealed a greater number of stones and these were more proximally distributed within the bile ducts when compared to MRCP.

CONCLUSIONS: MRCP is highly accurate in the diagnosis of choloedocholithiasis and has the potential to replace diagnostic ERCP. MRCP underestimates the number of bile duct stones present.Varghese, J. C. (2000). Clinical Radiology55, 25–35.

References (34)

  • SE Mitchell et al.

    A comparison of computed tomography and sonography in choledocholithiasis

    AJR

    (1984)
  • DM Einstein et al.

    The insensitivity of sono-graphy in the detection of choledocholithiasis

    AJR

    (1984)
  • FC Laing et al.

    Improved visualization of choledocholithiasis by sonography

    Am J Surg

    (1984)
  • JJ Cronan

    US diagnosis of choledocholithiasis: a reappraisal

    Radiology

    (1986)
  • PA Pasanen et al.

    A comparison of ultrasound, computed tomography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant jaundice and cholestasis

    Eur J Surg

    (1993)
  • CF Frey et al.

    Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

    Am J Surg

    (1982)
  • RF Thoeni et al.

    CT detection of asymptomatic pancreatitis following ERCP

    Gastrointest Radiol

    (1990)
  • Cited by (137)

    • Chapter 36A - Stones in the bile duct: Clinical features and open surgical approaches and techniques

      2016, Blumgart's Surgery of the Liver, Biliary Tract and Pancreas: Sixth Edition
    • Infections of the Biliary Tract

      2013, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      A transabdominal US is typically the initial imaging study of choice. It is highly sensitive and specific for evaluating the gallbladder and for detecting biliary ductal dilatation; however, its ability to detect bile duct stones is low, with a sensitivity ranging from 20% to 50%.50–52 A CT scan is useful when causes other than stones are suspected, such as malignancy and chronic pancreatitis.53,54

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text