Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Commentary
  • Published:

Inquiry-based and research-based laboratory pedagogies in undergraduate science

Undergraduate research experiences help retain students in science majors and prepare our workforce for increasingly competitive jobs. Course-based approaches to research and inquiry allow educators to reach larger numbers of students and provide an entry into further research experiences.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Inquiry and research exist on a continuum, from a pure verification experience in class to a full-fledged research experience.
Figure 2: Students carrying out measurements on contact angle goniometers.

References

  1. Mazur, E. Peer Instruction: A User's Manual 1–253 (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lewis, J.E. & Lewis, S.E. J. Chem. Educ. 82, 135–139 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Varma-Nelson, P. & Coppola, B.P. in Chemist's Guide to Effective Teaching (eds. Pienta, N.J., Greenbowe, T. & Cooper, M.M.) 155–169 (Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Oliver-Hoyo, M. & Beichner, R. in Teaching and Learning through Inquiry: a Guidebook for Institutions and Instructors (ed. Lee, V.S.) 51–62 (Stylus Publishing, Sterling, Virginia, USA, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Russell, C.B. & Weaver, G.C. Int. J. Scholarsh. Teach. Learn. <http://academics.georgiasouthern.edu/ijsotl/v2n2/articles/ PDFs/Article_Russell_and_Weaver.pdf> (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Schwab, J. Sch. Rev. 86, 176–195 (1960).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. American Association for the Advancement of Science. Science for All Americans 1–272 (Oxford University Press, New York, 1989).

  8. National Academy Press. The National Science Education Standards 1–262 (National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1996).

  9. National Research Council. Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: a Guide for Teaching and Learning 1–202 (Center for Science, Mathematics, and Engineering Education, Washington, DC, 2000).

  10. Windschitl, M. Sci. Educ. 87, 112–143 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fay, M.E., Grove, N.P., Towns, M.H. & Lowery Bretz, S. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 8, 212–219 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Harwood, W.S. J. Coll. Sci. Teach. 11, 29–33 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Steward, J. Research Experience and Inquiry: Uses and Effects of Authentic Environments in Science Education. PhD thesis, Purdue Univ. (2007).

  14. Chang, C.-Y. & Mao, S.-L. J. Educ. Res. 92, 340–346 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Luckie, D.B., Maleszewski, J.J., Loznak, S.D. & Krha, M. Adv. Physiol. Educ. 287, 199–209 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Russell, C.B. Development and Evaluation of a Research-Based Undergraduate Laboratory Curriculum. PhD thesis, Purdue Univ. (2008).

  17. Lopatto, D. Cell Biol. Educ. 3, 270–277 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Nagda, B.A., Gregerman, S.R., Jonides, J., von Hippel, W. & Lerner, J.S. Rev. Higher Educ. 22, 55–72 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Seymour, E., Hunter, A.-B., Laursen, S.L. & Deantoni, T. Sci. Educ. 88, 493–534 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Russell, S.H., Hancock, M.P. & McCullough, J. Science 316, 548–549 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Russell, S.H. Evaluation of NSF support for undergraduate research opportunities. SRI International <http://www.sri.com/policy/csted/reports/university/documents/UROSynthesisforWebJul506.pdf> (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  22. National Science Board. Science and engineering indicators. National Science Foundation <http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind02/> (2002).

  23. Pemberton, J.E. & Lee, M. Exploring the concept of undergraduate research centers. University of Arizona <http://urc.arizona.edu/URC%20Final%20Report.pdf> (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  24. National Science Foundation. Undergraduate Research Collaboratives Program Solicitation. National Science Foundation <http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2006/nsf06521/nsf06521.pdf> (2005).

  25. Weaver, G.C. et al. Chem. Educ. 11, 125–129 (2006).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Hanauer, D.I. et al. Science 314, 1880–1881 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Chen, J. et al. PLoS Biol. 3, e59 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Center for Authentic Science Practice in Education is funded by the US National Science Foundation through the Division of Chemistry, award #0418902.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weaver, G., Russell, C. & Wink, D. Inquiry-based and research-based laboratory pedagogies in undergraduate science. Nat Chem Biol 4, 577–580 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio1008-577

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio1008-577

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing