Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Research Article
  • Published:

Improved Refolding of an Immobilized Fusion Protein

Abstract

Fusion proteins of monomeric α-glucosidase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae containing N- or C-terminal hexa-arginine peptides were expressed in the cytosol of Escherichia coli in soluble form. The polycationic peptide moieties allow noncovalent binding of the denatured fusion proteins to a polyanionic solid support. Upon removal of the denaturant, refolding of the matrix-bound protein can proceed without perturbation by aggregation. However, nonspecific interactions of the denatured polypeptide, or of folding intermediates, with the matrix cause a drastic decrease in renaturation under suboptimal folding conditions. At low salt concentrations, ionic interactions of the refolding polypeptide with the matrix result in lower yields of renaturation. At higher salt concentrations, renaturation is prevented by hydrophobic interactions with the matrix. Apart from ionic strength, renaturation of the denatured matrix-bound fusion protein must be optimized with respect to pH, temperature, cosolvents, and matrix material used. Under optimum conditions, immobilized α-glucosidase can be renatured with a high yield at protein concentrations up to 5 mg/ml, whereas folding of the wild-type enzyme in solution is feasible only at an extremely low protein concentration (15 μg/ml). Thus, folding of the immobilized α-glucosidase allows an extremely high yield of the renaturated model protein. The technology should be applicable to other proteins that tend to aggregate during refolding.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marston, F.A.O. 1986. The purification of eukaryotic polypeptides synthesized in Escherichia coli. Biochemistry J. 240: 1–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rudolph, R. 1990 Renaturation of recombinant, disulfide-bonded proteins from “inclusion bodies,” p. 149–171 in Modern Methods in Protein and Nucleic Acid Research. H. Tschesche (ed), Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rudolph, R. 1996. Successful protein folding on an industrial scale, in Principles & Practice of Protein Engineering, J. L. Cleland & C. S. Craik (eds), J. Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York In press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kiefhaber, T., Rudolph, R., Kohler, H.-H. and Buchner, J. 1991. Protein aggregation in vitro and in vivo: A quantitative model of the kinetic competition between folding and aggregation. Bio/Technology 9: 825–829.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Höll-Neugebauer, B., Rudolph, R., Schmidt, M. and Buchner, J. 1991. Reconstitute of a heat shock effect in vitro Influence of GroE on the thermal aggregation of α-glucosidase from yeast. Biochemistry 30: 11609–11614.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Goldberg, M.E., Rudolph, R. and Jaemcke, R. 1991. A kinetic study of the competition between renaturation and aggregation during the refolding of denatured-reduced egg white lysozyme. Biochemistry 30: 2790–2797.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Golubinoff, P., Christeller, J.T., Gatenby, A.A. and Lorimer, G.H. 1989. Reconstitute of active dimeric ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase from an unfolded state depends on two chaperonm proteins and Mg-ATP. Nature 342: 884–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Buchner, J., Schmidt, M., Fuchs, M., Jaenicke, R., Rudolph, R., Schmid, F.X. and Kiefhaber, T. 1991. GroE facilitates refolding of citrate synthase by suppressing aggregation. Biochemistry 30: 1586–1591.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Freeman, R.B. 1992. Protein folding in the cell, p. 455–539 in Protein Folding. T. E. Creighton (ed.), W. H. Freeman and Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hendrick, R.W. and Hartl, F.U. 1993. Molecular chaperone function of heat shock proteins. Ann. Rev. Biochemistry 62: 349–384.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jaenicke, R. and Rudolph, R. 1989. Folding proteins, p. 191–223 in Protein Structure A Practical Approach. T. E. Creighton (ed.), IRL Press, Oxford, New York, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Epstein, C.J. and Anfinsen, C.B. 1962. The reversible reduction of disulfide bonds in trypsin and ribonuclease coupled to carboxymethyl cellulose. J. Biol. Chem. 237: 2175–2179.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mozhaev, V.V., Martinek, K. and Berezin, I.V. 1979. Effect of immobilization on folding of protein (trypsin). Mol. Biol. 13: 52–57.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sinha, N.K. and Light, A. 1975. Refolding of reduced, denatured trypsinogen and trypsin immobilized on agarose beads. J. Biol. Chem. 250: 8624–8629.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Creighton, T.E. 1985. Folding of proteins adsorbed reversibly to ion-exchange resins, p. 249–258 in UCLA Symposia on molecular and cellular biology new senes, Vol. 39 Oxender, D. L. (ed.).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Geng, X. and Chang, X. 1992. High-performance hydrophobic interaction chromatography as a tool for protein refolding. J. Chromatography 599: 185–194.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sinha, D., Bakhshi, M. and Vora, R. 1994. Ligand binding assays with recombinant proteins refolded on an affinity matrix. BioTechniques 17: 509–514.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ahmed, A.K., Schaffer, S.W. and Wetlaufer, D.B. 1975. Nonenzymic reactivation of reduced bovine pancreatic ribonuclease by air oxidation and by glutathione oxidoreduction buffers. J. Biol. Chem. 250: 8477–8482.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Seckler, R. and Jaenicke, R. 1992. Protein folding and protein refolding. FASEB J. 6: 2545–2552.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Stempfer, G. 1995. Dissertation. University of Regensburg.

  21. Walker, P.A., Leong, L.E.-C., Ng, P.W. P., Han Tan, S., Waller, S., Murphy, D. and Porter, A.G. 1994. Efficient and rapid affinity purification of proteins using recombinant fusion proteases. Bio/Technology. 12: 601–605.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Nygren, P.-A., Stahl, S. and Uhlén, M. 1994. Engineering proteins to facilitate bioprocessing. Tibtech 12: 184–188.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sambrook, J.L., Fritsch, E.F. and Maniatis, T. 1989. Molecular Cloning A Laboratory Manual, 2nd ed Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N. Y.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kopetzki, E., Schumacher, G. and Buckel, P. 1989. Control of formation of active soluble or inactive insoluble baker's yeast α-glucosidase PI in Escherichia coli by induction and growth conditions. Mol. Gen. Genet. 216: 149–155.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bradford, M.M. 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilization the principle of protein dye-binding. Anal. Biochemistry 72: 248–254.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stempfer, G., Höll-Neugebauer, B. & Rudolph, R. Improved Refolding of an Immobilized Fusion Protein. Nat Biotechnol 14, 329–334 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0396-329

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0396-329

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing