Abstract
AN approximately linear relationship between the mutagenic potency of a chemical in the Salmonella reverse mutation assay of Ames1 and its carcinogenic potency in animals, was recently alluded to2 and has since been discussed at several international symposia3,4. The implications of such a claim are clearly momentous. At present, the fact that the Salmonella assay can give both false positive and false negative results when compared with animal tests6,7 has led to its being regarded as an early warning system rather than the final arbiter of animal and possibly human carcinogenicity. A correlation between mutagenic and carcinogenic potency would, however, mean that a strong positive response in the Ames assay would define a potentially potent carcinogen, and would suggest that some compounds give positive results in this assay but fail to induce cancer in animals because their mutagenic potency is too low. We believe, however, that there is sufficient experimental evidence to treat any superficial potency correlation with great caution at this stage.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ames, B. N., McCann, J. & Yamasaki, E. Mutat. Res. 31, 347–364 (1975).
Ames, B. N. Science, 191, 241–245 (1976).
Ames, B. N. Eur. envir. Mutagen Soc. Meet. (Edinburgh, 1977).
Meselson, M. & Russell, K. Origins Hum. Cancer, Cold Spring Harbor Conf. (1976).
McCann, J., Choi, E., Yamasaki, E. & Ames, B. N. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 72, 5135–5139 (1975).
Purchase, I. F. H. et al. Nature 264, 624–627 (1976): Br. J. Cancer (in the press).
Stoltz, D. R. et al. Toxic appl. Pharmac. 29, 157–180 (1974).
Gillette, J. R. in In Vitro Metabolic Activation in Mutagenicity Testing (eds de Serres, F. J., Fouts, J. R., Bend, J. R. & Philpot, R. M.) (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1976).
Basu, T. K. & Dickerson, J. W. T. Chem.-Biol. Interact. 8, 193–206 (1974).
Food and Chemical News, 22 November, 64 (1976); Pesticide Toxic. chem. News, 22 August, 9 (1977).
Brookes, P. Mutat. Res. 39, 257–284 (1977).
Sims, P. & Grover, P. L. Adv. Cancer Res. 20, 165–274 (1974).
Sims, P., Grover, P. L., Swaisland, A., Pal, K. & Hewer, A. Nature 252, 326–328 (1974).
Levin, W. et al. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 73, 243–247 (1976).
Jerina, D. M. & Daly, J. W. Drug Metabolism (eds Parke, D. V. & Smith, R. L.)(Taylor and Francis, London, 1976).
Glatt, H. R., Oesch, F. A., Frigerio, & Garattini, S. Int. J. Cancer 16, 787–797 (1975).
Oesch, F., Bentley, P. & Glatt, H. R. Int. J. Cancer 18, 448–452 (1976).
Oesch, F. Xenobiotica 3, 305–340 (1972).
Coombs, M. M., Kissonerghis, A. M. & Allen, J. A. Cancer Res. 36, 4525–4529 (1976).
Nagao, M. et al. Cancer Res. 37, 399–407 (1977).
Bartsch, H., Malaveille, C., Montesano, R. & Tomatis, L. Nature 255, 641–643 (1975).
Chem. Engng News 18 July, 18 (1977).
Henschler, D., Eder, E., Neudecker, T. & Metzler, M. Archs Toxicol. 37, 233–236 (1977).
McGregor, D. Mutat. Res. 30, 305–315 (1975).
Arcos, J. C. & Argus, M. F. in Chemical Induction of Cancer 143 (Academic, New York, 1974).
Sugimura, T. et al. in Progress in Genetic Toxicology (eds Scott, D., Bridges, B. A. & Sobels, F. H.) 126–154 (Elsevier, North Holland, 1977).
Nagao, M. et al. Proc. Japan Acad. B 53, 95–98 (1977).
Nagao, M. Proc. Japan Acad. B 53, 34–37 (1977).
Lijnisky, W. & Saffiotti, U. Annali Ital. Derm. Chem. sper. 19, 34–44 (1965).
Zapp, J. A. Am. Ind. Hyg. Ass J. 36, 916 (1975).
Ashby, J., Styles, J. A. & Anderson, D. Br. J. Cancer 36, 564–571 (1977).
Bemes, V. & Sram, R. J. Ind. med. Surg. 38, 442–444 (1969).
Brusick, D., Jagannath, D. & Weekes, U. Mutat. Res. 41, 51–60 (1976).
Weekes, U. J. natn. Cancer Inst. 55, 1199–1201 (1975).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
ASHBY, J., STYLES, J. Does carcinogenic potency correlate with mutagenic potency in the Ames assay?. Nature 271, 452–455 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1038/271452a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/271452a0
This article is cited by
-
The paleoclimatic events and cause in the Okinawa Trough during 50 kaBP
Chinese Science Bulletin (2001)
-
Extended primary culture of human hepatocytes in a collagen gel sandwich system
In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Animal (1997)
-
Current trends in safety testing and toxicological research
Naturwissenschaften (1982)
-
Test systems for mutagenicity screening of environmental chemicals and their relevance for the evaluation of genetic hazards to man
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology (1981)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
