Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Relationship between receptor and mammary tumour virus production after stimulation by glucocorticoid

Abstract

A short exposure of primary cultures of mouse mammary tumour cells to glucocorticoids results in at least a threefold stimulation of mammary tumour virus (MTV) production. Specific interaction of glucocorticoids with the cytoplasmic and nuclear receptors can also be demonstrated. The biological potency of various steroids to stimulate MTV is related directly to the retention of the steroid–receptor complex in the nuclei. Progesterone has a high affinity for the cytoplasmic receptor, is not retained by the nuclei and does not stimulate or block the basal level of MTV production. It is, however, quite effective in abolishing the glucocorticoid-mediated stimulation of MTV and thus behaves as an antagonist of glucocorticoid.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McGrath, C. M., J. natn. Cancer Inst., 47, 455–467 (1971).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dickson, C., Haslam, S., and Nandi, S., Virology, 62, 242–252 (1974).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Parks, W. P., Scolnick, E. M., and Kozikowski, E. H., Science, 184, 158–160 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fine, D. L., Plowman, J. K., Kelley, S. P., Arthur, L. O., and Hillman, E. A., J. natn. Cancer Inst., 52, 1881–1886 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ringold, G., Lasfargues, E. Y., Bishop, J. M., and Varmus, H. E., Virology, 65, 135–147 (1975).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Young, L. J. T., Cardiff, R. D., and Ashley, R., J. natn. Cancer Inst., 54, 1215–1221 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Parks, W. P., Ransom, J. C., Young, H. A., and Scolnick, E. M., J. biol. Chem., 250, 3330–3336 (1975).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Thompson, E. B., and Lippman, M. E., Prog. Endocr, Metabolism, 23, 159–201 (1974).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Shyamala, G., J. biol. Chem., 249, 2160–2163 (1974).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shyamala, G., Biochemistry, 14, 437–444 (1975).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Young, H. A., Scolnick, E. M., and Parks, W. P., J. biol. Chem., 250, 3337–3343 (1975).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Santi, D. V., Sibley, C. H., Perriard, E. R., Tomkins, G. M., and Baxter, J. D., Biochemistry, 12, 2412–2416 (1973).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dickson, C., J. gen. Virol., 20, 243–247 (1973).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Burton, K., Biochem. J., 62, 315–323 (1956).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Scatchard, G., Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 51, 660–672 (1949).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gemmeltoft, S., and Schaumburg, B., Exerpta Med. Found. Int. Consr., Ser. No. 256, 147 (1972).

  17. Paran, M., Gallo, R. C., Richardson, L. S., and Wu, A. M., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 70, 2391–2395 (1973).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wu, A. M., Reitz, M. S., Paran, M., and Gallo, R. C., J. Virol., 14, 802–812 (1974).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Ihle, J. N., Lane, S. E., Kenney, F. T., and Farrell, J. C., Cancer Res., 35, 442–446 (1975).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dion, A. S., Vaidya, A. B., Sarkar, N. H., and Moore, D. H., Eighth Meeting on Mammary Cancer in Experimental Animals and Man, 74, (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Howk, R. S., Rye, L. A., Killeen, L. A., Scolnick, E. M., and Parks, W. P., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 70, 2117–2121 (1973).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Michailides, R., Schlom, J., Dahlberg, J., and Perk, K., J. Virol., 16, 1039–1050, (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rousseau, G. G., Baxter, J. D., Higgins, S. J., and Tomkins, G. M., J. molec. Biol., 79, 539–554 (1973).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ringold, G. M., Yamamoto, K. R., Tomkins, G. M., Bishop, J. M., and Varmus, H. E., Cell., 6, 299–305 (1975).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Griffin, M. J., and Cox, R. P., J. Cell Biol., 29, 1–9 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Granner, D. K., Thompson, E. B., and Tomkins, G. M., J. biol. Chem., 245, 1472–1478 (1970).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Chader, G. J., Biochem. biophys. Res. Commun., 43, 1102–1105 (1971).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shyamala, G., Dickson, C. Relationship between receptor and mammary tumour virus production after stimulation by glucocorticoid. Nature 262, 107–112 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1038/262107a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/262107a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing