Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Behaviour of Jaw Muscle Stretch Receptors during Active and Passive Movements in the Cat

Abstract

EVIDENCE in favour of the concept of servo control of muscle as expressed by Merton1, depended first on an interpretation of the electromyographic silent period resulting from procedures which unload the spindle2. Direct recording of spindle and fusimotor activity has supported the idea in the case of certain reflex limb movements3 and in the respiratory muscles of anaesthetized animals4,5. We have sought to extend consideration to the jaw muscles of the cat by recording from their afferents during reflex movements. The cell bodies of these first order afferents can be located in the mid-brain nucleus of the fifth cranial nerve (mid-n V) with extra-cellular metal microelectrodes, with a minimum of operative interference6. Receptors from jaw closing muscles greatly outnumber those from the openers7,8 and attention is restricted here to spindles and tendon organs in the former. Three other types of receptor are potentially represented and must be eliminated. First, tooth mechano-receptors are plentiful, particularly related to the canine teeth9. They were distinguished by their sensitivity to direct pressure on a tooth or gum with jaw supported. Cells belonging to such receptors occurred commonly in groups, their frequency range was lower than that of spindles and their extra-cellular action potentials were usually larger than those of any other cells. Second, extra-ocular muscle stretch receptors have been stated to have their cell bodies in the mid-n V10 and, because the bony orbit is deficient in the cat, jaw movements might have excited them. Although units were often found to be affected by passive eye movements, however, they were invariably more sensitive to jaw movement. Third, temporo-mandibular joint receptors might be represented in the mid-n V, but in fact no unit has been encountered which could not be ascribed to one of the other groups. Elimination of the above types leaves spindles and tendon organs in the jaw closing muscles. They can be distinguished as follows. The three muscles act in parallel on the jaw, so that twitch contraction in one of them brings about a pause in a spindle located in any of them, if some jaw movement is permitted. A tendon organ in one muscle will also pause during a twitch in either of the others, but will speed during a twitch of its own muscle. A twitch to each muscle in turn can therefore identify and locate a tendon organ or identify a spindle. The spindle must then be located by probing the muscle surface. Another important test for spindles is their sensitivity to small doses of succinyl choline (SCh) injected intra-arterially11. Each unit recorded was first tested as above (save for the SCh) and then its behaviour studied during active jaw movements. In the cat lightly anaesthetized with sodium pentobarbitone, reflex movements could be produced by putting fluid in the mouth, mechanically stimulating the pharynx and by obstructing the airway. Testing with SCh was delayed till after recording active movements.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Merton, P. A., The Spinal Cord (edit. by G. E. W. Wolstenholme), 247 (Churchill, London, 1953).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hammond, P. H., Merton, P. A., and Sutton, G. C., Brit. Med. Bull., 12, 214 (1956).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Granit, R., and Kaada, B. R., Acta Physiol. Scand., 27, 130 (1952).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Critchlow, V., and Von Euler, C. J., J. Physiol., 168, 820 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sears, T. A., Nature, 197, 1013 (1963).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Davey, M. R., and Taylor, A., J. Physiol., 185, 62P (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Corbin, K. B., and Harrison, F., J. Neurophysiol., 3, 423 (1940).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jerge, C. R., J. Neurophysiol., 26, 379 (1963).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Corbin, K. B., J. Comp. Neurol., 73, 153 (1940).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fillenz, M., J. Physiol., 128, 182 (1955).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Granit, R., Skoglund, S., and Thesleff, S., Acta Physiol. Scand., 28, 134 (1953).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fehr, H-U., J. Physiol., 178, 98 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Matthews, P. B. C., Physiol. Rev., 44, 219 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

TAYLOR, A., DAVEY, M. Behaviour of Jaw Muscle Stretch Receptors during Active and Passive Movements in the Cat. Nature 220, 301–302 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1038/220301a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/220301a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing