Abstract
In this contribution the four papers of this special issue on “Promoting Self-Regulated Learning Through Prompts” are discussed with the help of two crucial questions: What learning activities should be prompted and how should they be prompted? Overall, it is argued that future research has to conduct more in depth process analysis that incorporates multi-method assessment methods and to further account for individual learner characteristics. Prompting research, at present, needs more insights on how students actually deal with learning prompts.
In dieser Diskussion werden alle vier Beiträge des Themenheftes “Förderung selbstregulierten Lernens mittels Prompts” anhand von zwei zentralen Fragen erörtert: Welche Lernaktivitäten sollen mittels Prompts gefördert werden und wie können sie mittels Prompts unterstützt werden? Insgesamt lässt sich aus der Diskussion der Beiträge schlussfolgern, dass in zukünftigen Forschungsarbeiten verstärkt Prozessanalysen unter Verwendung von multiplen Erfassungsmethoden durchzuführen und darüber hinaus auch individuelle Lernvoraussetzungen zu berücksichtigen sind. Die derzeitige Forschung zu instruktionalen Prompts benötigt mehr Erkenntnisse darüber, wie Lernende mit den offerierten Prompts tatsächlich umgehen.
References
2009). Theoretical, conceptual, methodological, and instructional issues in research on metacognition and self-regulated learning: A discussion. Metacognition and Learning, 4, 87–95.
(2006). Effects of reflection prompts when learning with hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4, 359–375.
(2007a). Prompts zur Unterstützung von Lernprozessen: Diskussion der Arbeitsgruppe [
(Prompting to support learning: A discussion ]. 11. Fachtagung Pädagogische Psychologie, Berlin.2007b). Metakognition beim Lernen mit Hypermedia. Erfassung, Beschreibung und Vermittlung wirksamer metakognitiver Lernstrategien und Regulationsaktivitäten [
(Metacognition in learning with hypermedia. Assessment, description, and mediation of effective metacognitive learning strategies and regulation activities ]. Münster: Waxmann.2000). Handbook of self-regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
(2003). Prompting middle school science students for productive reflection: Generic and directed prompts. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 91–142.
(1992). Lern- und Denkstrategien – ein Problemaufriß. In , Lern- und Denkstrategien [
(Learning and thinking strategies ] (pp. 3–54). Göttingen: Hogrefe.2009). Activation of learning strategies in writing learning journals: The specificity of prompts matters. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 23, 95–104.
(1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 99–136.
(1988). Teaching for learning-to-learn: A critical appraisal with some proposals. Instructional Science, 17, 351–367.
(1999). Supporting learning of variable control in a computer-based biology environment: Effects of prompting college students to reflect on their own thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 837–858.
(2007). Self-regulated learning from science texts. In , Studies on the educational quality of schools. The final report on the DFG Priority Program (pp. 221–238). Münster: Waxmann.
(2003). Selbstreguliertes Lernen als Selbstregulation von Lernstrategien. Ein Trainingsexperiment mit Berufstätigen zum Lernen von Sachtexten. [
(Self-regulated learning as self-regulation of learning strategies. A training experiment with professionals on learning with expository texts ]. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 31, 38–56.1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66, 181–221.
(2009). Complex problem solving and worked examples: The role of prompting strategies behavior and fading-in solution steps. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 23, 129–138.
(2008). Motivational-volitionale Unterstützung für Blended-Learning-Angebote durch E-Mail-Botschaften. Zeitschrift für E-Learning, 3(1), 47–58.
(2001). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. In , Metacognition in learning and instruction. Theory, research and practice (pp. 3–16). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
(1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251–296.
(2009). Is it merely a question of “what” to prompt or also “when” to prompt? The role of point of presentation time of prompts in self-regulated learning. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 23, 105–115.
(1993). Intellectual ability and metacognitive skill: Determinants of discovery learning in computerized learning environments. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
(2007). The assessment and instruction of self-regulation in computer-based environments: A discussion. Metacognition and Learning, 2, 177–183.
(1997). The generality vs. domain-specificity of metacognitive skills in novice learning across domains. Learning and Instruction, 7, 187–209.
(2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 3–14.
(1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In , Handbook of research and teaching (pp. 315–327). New York: Macmillan.
(1994). Lernstrategien im Studium: Ergebnisse zur Faktorenstruktur und Reliabilität eines neuen Fragebogens [
(Learning strategies for studying: Results on factorial structure and reliability of a new questionnaire ]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 15, 185–200.2009). Inquiry learning: Multi-level support with respect to inquiry, explanations, and regulation during an inquiry cycle. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 23, 117–127.
(1996). A metacognitive view of individual differences in self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 327–353.
(