Skip to main content
Published Online:https://doi.org/10.1024/1010-0652.23.2.139

In this contribution the four papers of this special issue on “Promoting Self-Regulated Learning Through Prompts” are discussed with the help of two crucial questions: What learning activities should be prompted and how should they be prompted? Overall, it is argued that future research has to conduct more in depth process analysis that incorporates multi-method assessment methods and to further account for individual learner characteristics. Prompting research, at present, needs more insights on how students actually deal with learning prompts.


Förderung selbstregulierten Lernens mittels Prompts – eine Diskussion

In dieser Diskussion werden alle vier Beiträge des Themenheftes “Förderung selbstregulierten Lernens mittels Prompts” anhand von zwei zentralen Fragen erörtert: Welche Lernaktivitäten sollen mittels Prompts gefördert werden und wie können sie mittels Prompts unterstützt werden? Insgesamt lässt sich aus der Diskussion der Beiträge schlussfolgern, dass in zukünftigen Forschungsarbeiten verstärkt Prozessanalysen unter Verwendung von multiplen Erfassungsmethoden durchzuführen und darüber hinaus auch individuelle Lernvoraussetzungen zu berücksichtigen sind. Die derzeitige Forschung zu instruktionalen Prompts benötigt mehr Erkenntnisse darüber, wie Lernende mit den offerierten Prompts tatsächlich umgehen.

References

  • Azevedo, R. (2009). Theoretical, conceptual, methodological, and instructional issues in research on metacognition and self-regulated learning: A discussion. Metacognition and Learning, 4, 87–95. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bannert, M. (2006). Effects of reflection prompts when learning with hypermedia. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4, 359–375. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Bannert, M. (2007a). Prompts zur Unterstützung von Lernprozessen: Diskussion der Arbeitsgruppe [Prompting to support learning: A discussion]. 11. Fachtagung Pädagogische Psychologie, Berlin. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Bannert, M. (2007b). Metakognition beim Lernen mit Hypermedia. Erfassung, Beschreibung und Vermittlung wirksamer metakognitiver Lernstrategien und Regulationsaktivitäten [Metacognition in learning with hypermedia. Assessment, description, and mediation of effective metacognitive learning strategies and regulation activities]. Münster: Waxmann. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Boekaerts, M. , Pintrich, P.R. , Zeidner, M. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of self-regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Davis, E.A. (2003). Prompting middle school science students for productive reflection: Generic and directed prompts. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12, 91–142. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Friedrich, H.F. , Mandl, H. (1992). Lern- und Denkstrategien – ein Problemaufriß. In H. Mandl, H.F. Friedrich (Hrsg.), Lern- und Denkstrategien [Learning and thinking strategies] (pp. 3–54). Göttingen: Hogrefe. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Glogger, I. , Holzäpfel, L. , Schwonke, R. , Nückles, M. , Renkl, A. (2009). Activation of learning strategies in writing learning journals: The specificity of prompts matters. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 23, 95–104. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Hattie, J. , Biggs, J. , Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 99–136. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Klauer, K.J. (1988). Teaching for learning-to-learn: A critical appraisal with some proposals. Instructional Science, 17, 351–367. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Lin, X. , Lehman, J.D. (1999). Supporting learning of variable control in a computer-based biology environment: Effects of prompting college students to reflect on their own thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 837–858. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Leopold, C. , den Elzen-Rump, V. , Leutner, D. (2007). Self-regulated learning from science texts. In M. Prenzel (Ed.), Studies on the educational quality of schools. The final report on the DFG Priority Program (pp. 221–238). Münster: Waxmann. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Leutner, D. , Leopold, C. (2003). Selbstreguliertes Lernen als Selbstregulation von Lernstrategien. Ein Trainingsexperiment mit Berufstätigen zum Lernen von Sachtexten. [Self-regulated learning as self-regulation of learning strategies. A training experiment with professionals on learning with expository texts]. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 31, 38–56. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Rosenshine, B. , Meister, C. , Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66, 181–221. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Schmidt-Weigand, F. , Hänze, M. , Wodzinski, R. (2009). Complex problem solving and worked examples: The role of prompting strategies behavior and fading-in solution steps. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 23, 129–138. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Schoor, C. , Jenus, B. , Bannert, M. (2008). Motivational-volitionale Unterstützung für Blended-Learning-Angebote durch E-Mail-Botschaften. Zeitschrift für E-Learning, 3(1), 47–58. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Schraw, G. (2001). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. In H. Hartman (Ed.), Metacognition in learning and instruction. Theory, research and practice (pp. 3–16). Dordrecht: Kluwer. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Sweller, J. , van Merrienboer, J. , Paas, F. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251–296. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Thillmann, H. , Künsting, J. , Wirth, J. , Leutner, D. (2009). Is it merely a question of “what” to prompt or also “when” to prompt? The role of point of presentation time of prompts in self-regulated learning. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 23, 105–115. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Veenman, M.V.J. (1993). Intellectual ability and metacognitive skill: Determinants of discovery learning in computerized learning environments. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Veenman, M.V.J. (2007). The assessment and instruction of self-regulation in computer-based environments: A discussion. Metacognition and Learning, 2, 177–183. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Veenman, M.V.J. , Elshout, J.J. , Meijer, J. (1997). The generality vs. domain-specificity of metacognitive skills in novice learning across domains. Learning and Instruction, 7, 187–209. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Veenman, M.V.J. , van Hout-Wolters, B.H.A.M. , Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: Conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 3–14. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar

  • Weinstein, C.E. , Mayer, R.E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M.C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research and teaching (pp. 315–327). New York: Macmillan. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wild, K.P. , Schiefele, U. (1994). Lernstrategien im Studium: Ergebnisse zur Faktorenstruktur und Reliabilität eines neuen Fragebogens [Learning strategies for studying: Results on factorial structure and reliability of a new questionnaire]. Zeitschrift für Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie, 15, 185–200. First citation in articleGoogle Scholar

  • Wichmann, A. , Leutner, D. (2009). Inquiry learning: Multi-level support with respect to inquiry, explanations, and regulation during an inquiry cycle. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 23, 117–127. First citation in articleLinkGoogle Scholar

  • Winne, P.H. (1996). A metacognitive view of individual differences in self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 327–353. First citation in articleCrossrefGoogle Scholar