Abstract
The Human Development Index (HDI) implicitly defines ``human development'' and ranks countries accordingly. To elucidate the HDI's meaning of ``human development,'' the paper examines the sensitivity of the HDI to changes in its components, namely social indicators of education, longevity and standard of living. The HDI is next compared with two alternatives, the Life Quality Index (LQI) and a Time Allocation Index (TAI) developed in this paper from the HDI's components. Also considered is the likely uncertainly in the HDI and what it means for HDI rankings.It is concluded that the HDI's weighting of the gross domestic product is in good agreement with peoples' preferences as revealed in the LQI and the TAI; further, that the HDI places many times greater weight on education than is indicated by peoples' allocation of time in developed countries. Literacy is accorded very high weight in the HDI, but its measure is unreliable. The HDI ranking of highly developed nations is so close and so uncertain that it is meaningless.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
UNDP: 1990–1999, The Human Development Report. United Nations Development Program, CD-ROM.
Nathwani, J.S., M. Pandey and N.C. Lind: 1996, ‘Managing risks with the life quality index’, Institute for Risk Research, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lind, N. Values Reflected in the Human Development Index. Social Indicators Research 66, 283–293 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SOCI.0000003587.32655.b7
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SOCI.0000003587.32655.b7