Abstract
The paper compares the research performance in computer science of four major Western countries, India and China, based on the data abstracted from INSPEC database during the period 1993–2002. A total of 9,632 computer science papers recorded in INSPEC database were used for the comparison. The findings indicate that, on the one hand, the number of papers produced in China has considerably increased in the past few years. Particularly, in recent years, China occupies a remarkable high position in terms of counts of papers indexed by the INSPEC database. On the other hand, Chinese scientists preferred to publish in domestic journals and proceedings and shares of SCI-papers to the total journal papers for China have still remained the lowest. This indicates that the research activities of Chinese scientists in computer science are still rather “local” and suffer from a low international visibility. Various scientometric indicators, such as Normalized Impact Factor, ratio of papers in high quality journals are further adopted to analyze research performance and diverse finding are obtained. Nevertheless, for these surrogate indicators, China has optimistically achieved great progress, characterized with “low level of beginning and high speed of developing”. The policy implication of the findings lies in that China, as well as other less developed countries in science, can earn relative competitive advantages in some new emerging or younger disciplines such as computer science by properly using catch-up strategy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ajiferuke, I., Burrell, Q., Tague, J. (1988), Collaborative coefficient: A single measure of the degree of collaboration in research, Scientometrics, 14: 421–433.
Annual Report of Science and Technology Development of China (By Research Group on Development and Strategy of S & T of China, 2002), Beijing: Economic Management Publishing House (in Chinese), 148-152.
Arunachalam, S., Singh, U. N., Sinha, R. (1993), The sleeping dragon wakes up: A scientometric analysis of the growth of science and the usage of journals in China, Current Science, 65: 809–822.
Bordons, M., Fernandez, M. T., Gomez, I. (2002), Advantages and limitations in the use of impact factor measures for the assessment of research performance in a peripheral country, Scientometrics, 53 (2): 195–206.
Braun, T., Schubert, A., GlÄnzel, W. (1985), Scientometric Indicators: A 32 Countries Comparative Evaluation of Publishing Performance and Citation Impact. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore.
Braun, T., GlÄnzel, W., Schubert, A. (1990), Publication productivity: From frequency distributions to scientometric indicators, Journal of Information Science, 16: 37–44.
Carpenter, M. P., Narin, F. (1981), The adequacy of the Science Citation Index (SCI) as an indicator of international scientific activity, Journal of American Society for Information Science, 32: 430–439.
Egghe, L., Rousseau, R. (2002) A general frame-work for relative impact indicators, Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 27 (1): 29–48.
Frame, J. D. (1977) Mainstream research in Latin America and Caribbean, Interciencia, 2: 143–198.
Frame, J. D., Narin, F. (1987), The growth of Chinese Scientific research 1973-84, Scientometrics, 12: 135–144.
Garg, K. C. (2002), Scientometrics of laser research in India and China, Scientometrics, 55 (1): 71–85.
Garg, K. C., Dutt, B. (1992), Bibliometrics of Indian Science as reflected through Science Citation Index, Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 51: 329–340.
Garg, K. C., Padhi, P. (1998), Scientometrics study of laser patent literature, Scientometrics, 43: 443–454.
Garg, K. C., Padhi, P. (1999), Scientometrics of laser research literature as viewed through the Journal of Current Laser Abstract, Scientometrics, 45: 251–268.
Garg, K. C., Padhi, P. (2001), A study of collaboration in laser science and technology, Scientometrics, 50 (2): 415–427.
Garg, K. C., Padhi, P. (2002), Scientometrics of laser research in India during 1970-1994, Scientometrics, 55 (2): 215–241.
Guan, J. C., Wang, J. X. (2004), Evaluation and interpretation of knowledge production efficiency, Scientometrics, 59 (1): 131–155.
Irvine, J., Martin, B., Peacock, T., Turner, R. (1985), Charting the decline in British science, Nature, 316: 587–590.
International Information Service in Physics, Electro-technology, Computer Control [DB/OL], http://www.ovid.com
Journal Citation Report, ISI, http://www.webofkonwledge.com.
King, J. (1989), A review of bibliometric and other science indicators and their role in research evaluation, Journal of Information Science, 13: 261–276.
Karki, M. M. S., Garg, K. C. (1997), Bibliometrics of Alkaloid Chemistry research in India, Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Science, 37: 157–161.
Lu, Q., Lazonick, W. (2001), The organisation of innovation in a transitional economy: business and government in Chinese electronic publishing, Research Policy, 30: 55–77.
May, R. M., (1997), The scientific wealth of nations, Science, 275 (5301): 793–796.
Nagpaul, P. S. (1995), Contribution of Indian university to the mainstream scientific literature: A bibliometric assessment, Scientometrics, 32: 11–36.
Narin, F., Frame, J.D. (1989), The growth of Japanese science and technology, Science, 245: 600–605.
Price, D. De. S. (1981), The analysis of scientometric metrics for policy implications, Scientometrics, 3: 47–54.
Price, D. De. S., Beaver, D. De. B. (1966), Collaboration in an invisible college, American Psychologist, 3: 1011.
Van Raan, A. F. J., Bibliometric indicators as research performance evaluation tools, In: Proceedings of the European University Institute Conference on ‘Research Management in Europe Today’, Florence, 13-15 December 1990.
Ren, S., Rousseau, R., (2002), International visibility of Chinese scientific journals, Scientometrics, 53 (3): 389–405.
Schubert, A., Braun, T. (1986) Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact, Scientometrics, 9: 281–291.
Sen, B. K. (1992), Normalized Impact Factor, J. Documentation, 48: 318–329.
Van Leeuwen, TH. N., Moed, H. F., Reedijk, J. (1999), Critical comments on Institute for Scientific Information impact factors: a sample of inorganic molecular chemistry journals, Journal of Information Science, 25 (6): 489–498.
Zhang, H. Q., Zhang, Y. H. (1997), Scientometric study on research performance in China, Information Processing & Management, 33 (1): 81–89.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Guan, J., Ma, N. A comparative study of research performance in computer science. Scientometrics 61, 339–359 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000045114.85737.1b
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000045114.85737.1b