Skip to main content
Log in

Disinfection in Food Processing – Efficacy Testing of Disinfectants

  • Published:
Reviews in Environmental Science and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The key to effective cleaning and disinfection of food plants is the understanding of the type of the soil to be removed from the surfaces. An efficient cleaning and disinfection procedure consists of a sequence of rinses using good quality water with application of detergents and disinfectants. Disinfection is required in food plant operations, where wet surfaces provide favourable conditions for the growth of microbes. The efficacy of disinfectants is usually determined in suspensions, which do not mimic the growth conditions on surfaces where the agents are required to inactivate the microbes. Therefore, the suspension tests do not give adequate information and reliable carrier tests, which mimic surface growth, are needed. In developing a proposal for the testing of disinfectants on surfaces to an analytical standard, it is important to identify the major sources of variation in the procedure. In response to the need for a relatively realistic, simple and reliable test for disinfectant efficacy a method for culturing laboratory model biofilms has developed. The use of artificial biofilms i.e. biofilm-constructs inoculated with process contaminants in disinfectant testing can also be used for screening the activity of various disinfectants on biofilm cells. Both biofilm carrier tests showed clearly that the biofilm protects the microbes against the disinfectants. The chemical cleanliness is also essential in food plants. The total cleanliness of the process lines is mainly based on measuring the microbial load using culturing techniques. These results can give an incorrect picture of the total cleanliness, because the viable microbes do not grow when disinfectants are left on the surface. The luminescent bacteria light inhibition method offers a useful alternative for testing chemical residue left on surfaces after cleaning and disinfection operations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Best M, Kennedy ME & Coates F (1990) Efficacy of a variety of disinfectants against Listeria spp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56: 377–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield SF (1988) Cosmetics and pharmaceuticals: Biodeterioration and disinfectants. In: Houghton DR, Smith RN & Eggins HOW (Eds) Biodeterioration 7 (pp 135–145). Elsevier Publishers Ltd., Essex

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield SF, Arthur M, Klingeren B, van Pullen W, Holah JT & Elton R (1994) An evaluation of the repeatability and reproducibility of a surface test for the activity of disinfectants. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 76: 86–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Brackett RE (1992) Shelf stability and safety of fresh produce as influenced by sanitation and disinfection. J. Food Prot. 55: 808–814

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpentier B & Cerf O (1993) Biofilms and their consequences, with particular reference to hygiene in the food industry. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 75: 499–511

    Google Scholar 

  • Charaf UK, Bakich SL & Falbo DM (1999) A model biofilm for efficacy assessment of antimicrobials versus biofilm bacteria. In: Wimpenny J, Gilbert P, Walker J, Brading M & Bayston R (Eds) Biofilms–The Good, the Bad and the Ugly. BBC4 (pp 171 –177). BioLine, Cardiff

    Google Scholar 

  • Chisti Y & Moo-Young M (1994) Cleaning-in-place systems for industrial bioreactors: design, validation and operations. J. Ind. Microbiol. 13: 201–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen BE (1989) The role of extracellular polysaccharides in biofilms. J. Biotechnol. 10: 181–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Costerton JW & Lashen ES (1983) The inherent biocide resistance of corrosion-causing biofilm bacteria. In: The NACE Annual Conference and Corrosion Show, Corrosion 83, NACE Publication Department, Huston. Paper no. 246, Anaheim, California, USA, 18–22 April (11 pp)

    Google Scholar 

  • Czechowski MH & Banner M (1990) Control of biofilms in breweries through cleaning and sanitizing. Techn. Quart. Mast. Brew. Ass. Am. 293: 86–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagar RG, Leder J, Stanley JP & Theis AB (1988) The use of glutaraldehyde for microbiological control in waterflood systems. Mater. Perform. 27: 40–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Exner M, Tuschewitzki G-J & Scharnagel J (1987) Influence of biofilms by chemical disinfectants and mechanical cleaning. Zbl. Bakteriol. Mikrobiol. Hygiene, Serie B 183, 549–563

    Google Scholar 

  • Flemming H-C (1991) Biofouling in water treatment. In: Flemming H-C & Geesey GG (Eds) Biofouling and Biocorrosion in Industrial Water Systems (pp 47–80). Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank JF & Koffi RA (1990) Surface-adherent growth of Listeria monocytogenes is associated with increased resistance to surfactant sanitizers and heat. J. Food Prot. 53: 550–554

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert P & Allison DG (1999) Dynamics in microbial communities: A Lamarkian perspective. In: Wimpenny J, Gilbert P, Walker J, Brading M & Bayston R (Eds) Biofilms – The Good, the Bad and the Ugly. BBC4, (pp 263–268). BioLine, Cardiff

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert P, Jones MV, Allison DG, Heys S, Maira T & Wood P (1998) The use of poloxamer hydrogels for the assessment of biofilm susceptibility towards biocide treatments. J. Appl. Microbiol. 85: 985–991

    Google Scholar 

  • Grönholm LMO, Wirtanen GL, Ahlgren K, Nordström K & Sjöberg A-MK (1999) Anti-microbial activities of disinfectants and cleaning agents against food spoilage microbes in the food and brewery industries. Z. Lebensm. Unters. Forsch. A, 208: 289–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould WA (1994) Current good manufacturing practices: Food Plant Sanitation. 2nd edn (pp.189–215) CTI Publications, Inc., Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Han Y, Guentert AM, Smith RS, Linton RH & Nelson PE (1999) Efficacy of chlorine dioxide gas as a sanitizer for tanks used for aseptic juice storage. Food Microbiol. 16: 53–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinzel M (1988) The phenomena of resistance to disinfectants and preservatives. In: Industrial Biocides (pp 52–67). John Wiley & Sons, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Holah JT (1992) Industrial monitoring: Hygiene in food processing. In: Melo LF, Bott TR, Fletcher M & Capdeville B (Eds) Biofilms–Science and Technology (pp. 645–659). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Holah JT, Betts RP & Thorpe RH (1988) The use of direct epifluorescent microscopy DEM and the direct epifluorescent filter technique DEFT to assess microbial populations on food contact surfaces. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 65: 215–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Holah JT, Higgs C, Robinson S, Worthington D & Spenceley H (1990) A conductance-based surface disinfection test for food hygiene. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 11: 255–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Holah J & Timperley A (1999) Hygienic design of food processing facilities and equipment. In: Wirtanen G, Salo S & Mikkola A (Eds), 30th R3-Nordic Contamination Control Symposium, VTT Symposium 193. Libella Painopalvelu Oy, Espoo (pp 11–39)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood SK & Zottola EA (1995) Biofilms in food processing. Food Control 6: 9–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Juvonen R, Nohynek L, Storgårds E, Wirtanen G, Honkapää K, Lyijynen T, Mokkila M & Haikara A (2001) Control of yeast contaminations in food industry–Literature study. VTT Tiedotteita –Meddelanden –Research Notes: 2107. 144 pp, Otamedia Oy, Espoo (in Finnish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer JF (1997) Peracetic acid: A new biocide for industrial water applications, Mater. Perform. 36(8): 42–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Lappalainen J (2001) Improved use and new applications of luminescent bacteria. Annales Universitatis Turkuensis Ser A I TOM. 264. (54 pp) Gillot Oy, Turku

    Google Scholar 

  • Lappalainen J, Salo S & Wirtanen G (2003) Detergent and disinfectant residue testing with photobacteria. In: Wirtanen G & Salo S (Eds) 34th R3-Nordic Contamination Control Symposium. VTT Symposium 229 (pp 151–159). Otamedia Oy, Espoo

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson EL & Morton HE (1991) Alcohols. In: Block SS (Ed) Disinfection, sterilization and preservation. 4th edn (pp 204–224). Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • LeChevallier MW, Cawthon CD & Lee RG (1988) Factors promoting survival of bacteria in chlorinated water supplies. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 54: 649–654

    Google Scholar 

  • Lelieveld HLM (1985) Hygienic design and test methods. J. Soc. Dairy Technol. 38: 14–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin SH & Yeh KL (1993) Cooling water treatment by ozonization, Chem. Eng. Technol. 16, 275–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Marrie TJ & Costerton JW (1981). Prolonged survival of Serratia marcescens in chlorhexidine. Appl. Environ. Microiol. 42: 1093–1102

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattila-Sandholm T & Wirtanen G (1992) Biofilm formation in the industry: A review. Food Rev. Int. 8: 573–603

    Google Scholar 

  • McBain AJ, Allison DG & Gilbert P (2000) Population dynamics in microbial biofilms. In: Allison DG, Gilbert P, Lappin-Scott HM & Wilson M (Eds) Community Structure and Co-operation in Biofilms (pp.309–327). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath K, Odell DE & Davenport RR (1991) The sensitivity of vegetative cells and ascospore of some food spoilage yeasts to sanitisers. Int. Biodeterior. 27: 313–326

    Google Scholar 

  • McKane L & Kandel J (1996) Microbiology: Essentials and Applications. 2nd edn (pp 76–83). New York: McGraw-Hill Inc

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosteller TM & Bishop JR (1993) Sanitizer efficacy against attached bacteria in a milk biofilm. J. Food Prot. 56: 34–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikaido H & Vaara M (1985) Molecular basis of bacterial outer membrane permeability. Microbiol. Rev. 49: 1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Pontefract RD (1991) Bacterial adherence: Its consequences in food processing. Can. Inst. Food Sci. Technol. J. 24: 113–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson SS & Stewart PS (1997) Evidence of bacterial adaptation to monochloramine in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms and evaluation of biocide action model, Biotech. Bioeng. 56: 201–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Sequeira CAC, Carrasquinho PMNA & Cebola CM (1989) Control of microbial corrosion in cooling water systems by the use of biocides. In: Microbial Corrosion Conference, Elsevier Applied Science, Essex (pp. 240–255) Sintra, 7–9 March, 1988

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart PS, Griebe T, Srinivasan R, Chen C-I, Yu FP, Beer D de & McFeters GA (1994) Comparison of respiratory activity and culturability during monochloramine disinfection of binary population biofilms, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60: 1690–1692

    Google Scholar 

  • Troller JA (1993) Sanitation in Food Processing (pp 30–70, 263–286). Academic Press Inc., San Diego 263–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Winniczuk PP & Parish ME (1997) Minimum inhibitory concentrations of antimicrobials against micro-organisms related to citrus juice. Food Microbiol. 14: 373–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirtanen G (1995) Biofilm Formation and its Elimination from Food Processing Equipment. VTT Publications 251 (106 pp) VTT Offsetpaino, Espoo

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirtanen G, Aalto M, Härkönen P, Gilbert P & Mattila-Sandholm T (2001) Efficacy testing of commercial disinfectants against foodborne pathogenic and spoilage microbes in biofilm-constructs. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 213: 409–414

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirtanen G & Juvonen R (2002) Disinfectant efficacy on spoilage yeasts isolated from various food processes. In: Wilson DI, Fryer PJ & Hastings APM (Eds) Fouling, Cleaning and Disinfection in Food Processing (pp 189–196). City Services Design and Print, Cambridge, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirtanen G, Langsrud S, Salo S, Olofson U, Alnås H, Neuman M, Homeid JP & Mattila-Sandholm T (2002) Evaluation of Sanitation Procedures for Use in Dairies (96 pp). VTT Publication 481. Otamedia Oy, Espoo

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirtanen G, Saarela M & Mattila-Sandholm T (2000) Biofilms –Impact on hygiene in food industries. In: Bryers J (Ed.) Biofilms II: Process Analysis and Applications (pp 327–372). John Wiley-Liss Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirtanen G, Salo S, Allison D, Mattila-Sandholm T & Gilbert P (1998) Performance-evaluation of disinfectant formulations using poloxamer-hydrogel biofilm-constructs. J. Appl. Microbiol. 85: 965–971

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirtanen G, Salo S & Gilbert P (2003) Efficacy testing of disinfectants using microbes grown in biofilm-constructs. In: Click, A (Ed.) Biofilms in Industry, Medicine and Environmental Technology–Monitoring, Analysis and Control. IWA Publishing, London. In press

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirtanen G, Salo S, Maukonen J, Bredholt S & Mattila-Sandholm T (1997) NordFood Sanitation in dairies, VTT Publications 309. Espoo, VTT Offsetpaino, 47 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Zottola EA & Sasahara KC (1994) Microbial biofilms in the food processing industry–should they be a concern? Int. J. Food Microbiol. 23: 125–148

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wirtanen, G., Salo, S. Disinfection in Food Processing – Efficacy Testing of Disinfectants. Re/Views in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology 2, 293–306 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RESB.0000040471.15700.03

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:RESB.0000040471.15700.03

Navigation