Skip to main content
Log in

Distribution patterns of available P and K in rape rhizosphere in relation to genotypic difference

  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Plant genotypic differences in available K and P distribution at root-soil interface were studied with five rape varieties, which were 890206 (Brassica. campestris), Indian Mustard (Brassica juncea), Luzhoujinhuang (Brassica juncea), K-100 (Brassica juncea) and Xinongchangjiao (Brassica napus). The significant depletion of P and K was observed in the rhizosphere of all five rape varieties. The depletion rate of available P was in the range of 28–44% and the order followed: 890206 > Indian Mustard > K-100 > Xinongchangjiao > Luzhoujinhuang. The depletion area of available P occurred within 3–5 mm from root surface; and a wider depletion range was observed in the rhizosphere of the variety tolerant to low nutrient supply as compared to that of sensitive varieties. The depletion range of available K within the 10 mm from the root surface with the rate ranging from 31% to 48% and was wider than that of available P. The variety 890206 showed the highest absorption capability. Xinongchangjiao and Luzhoujinhuang showed higher depletion rate than that of K-100 and Indian Mustard, indicating that high-yield varieties of 890206 and Xinongchangjiao had higher absorption capacity of K than that of low-yield variety K-100. The results indicated that K depletion rate in the rhizosphere of rape was higher than that of cotton and was similar to that of two K enrichment plant–tobacco and alligator weed (Alternanthern Philoxeroides Mart. Griseb).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chen C R, Condeon L M, Davis M R and Sherlock R P 2002 Phosphorus dynamics in the rhizosphere of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenneL.) and rasiata pine (Pinus radiata D. Don). Soil Biol. Biochem. 34, 487–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen J X 1993 Effect of potassium nutrition of rice on rhizosphere soils. Soils (China) 25, 304–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curl E A and Truelove B 1985 The rhizosphere. Springer–Verlag, Berlin, pp. 167–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dakora F D and Phillips D A 2002 Root exudates as mediators of mineral acquisition in low–nutrient environments. Plant Soil 245, 45–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dieffenbach A and Matzner E 2000 In situsoil solution chemistry in the rhizosphere of mature Norway spruce (Picea abiesL. Karst.) trees. Plant Soil 222, 149–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinkelaker B, Romheld V and Marschner H 1989 Citric acid excretion and precipitation of calcium citrate in the rhizosphere of white lupin (Lupinus albusL). Plant Cell Environ. 12, 285–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fohse D, Claassen N and Jungk A 1991 Phosphorus efficiency of plants: II. Significance of root radius, root hairs and cation anion balance for phosphorus influx in seven plant species. Plant Soil 132, 261–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • George T S, Gregory R J, Robinson J S and Buresh R J 2002 Changes in phosphorus concentrations and pH in the rhizosphere of some agroforestry and crop species. Plant Soil246, 65–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner W K, Barber D A and Parberry D G 1983 The acquisition of phosphorus by lupinus albus L.III. The probable mechanism by which phosphorus movement on the soil–root interface is enhanced. Plant Soil 70, 107–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinsinger P 2001 Bioavailability of soil inorganic P in the rhizosphere as affected by root–induced chemical changes: A review.Plant Soil 237, 173–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffland E, Van Den Boogaard R, Nelemans JA and Findenegg G 1992 Biosynthesis and root exudation of citric and malic acids in phosphate–starved rape plants. New Phytologist 122, 675–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horst W J, Abdou M and Wiesler F 1996 Differences between wheat cultivars in acquisition and utilization of phosphorus. Z.Pflanzenernaehr. Bodenk. 159, 155–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasilnikoff G, Gahoonia T and Nielsen N E 2003 Variation in phosphorus uptake efficiency by genotypes of cowpea (vigna unguiculata) due to differences on root and root hair length and induced rhizosphere processes. Plant Soil 251, 83–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuchenbuch R and Jungk A 1982 A method for determining concentration profiles at the soil–root interface by thin slicing rhizosphere soil. Plant Soil 68, 391–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao ZW, Wang J L and Liu Z Y 1993 Si, Fe and Mn distributions in rice (Oryza sativaL) rhizosphere of red earths and paddy soils.Pedosphere 3, 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z Y, Li L M and Shi W M 1997 Research Methods in Rhizosphere. Jiangsu Science and Technology Publishing House, Nanjing, pp. 223–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch J 1995 Root architecture and plant productivity. Plant Physiol. 109, 7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschner H 1995 Mineral nutrition of higher plants (2nd edition).Academic Press, London. pp. 483–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moorby H, White R E and Nye P H 1988 The influence of phosphate nutrition on H ion efflux from the roots of young rape plants.Plant Soil 105, 247–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Narang R A, Bruene A and Altmann T 2000 Analysis of phosphate acquisition efficiency in different Arabidopsisaccessions. Plant Physiol. 124, 1786–1799.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen S R and Sommers T E 1982 Phosphorus. In A. L. Page et al. (ed) Methods of Soil analysis. Part 2, (2nd edition). American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI. pp. 403–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rengel Z 1997 Root exudation and microflora populations in rhizosphere of crop genotypes differing in tolerance to micronutrient deficiency. Plant Soil 196, 255–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rengel Z 2002 Genetic control of root exudation. Plant Soil 245, 59–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schachtman D P, Reid R J and Ayling S M 1998 Phosphorus uptake by plants: From soil to cell. Plant Physiol. 116, 447–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi W M and Liu Z Y 1987 Effects of NH3 and urea on K distribution in root and rhizosphere of maize. Fertil. Res. 14, 235–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi W M 1996 The roles of root exudates in material cycling in soil–plant system (rhizosphere). InProceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Material Cycling in Pedosphere, Nanjing.Ed. Q G Zhao. pp. 238–2252.

  • Xu M L and Liu Z Y 1983 The Nutrient status of soil–root interface II. The accumulation and depletion of potassium. Acta Pedol.Sinica 20, 295–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan W D, Shi W M, Liao H Q and Cao Z H 1997 Genotypic difference of plants in K–enrichment capability and the distribution of K in plant rhizosphere. Pedosphere 7, 165–170.

  • Zhang J and George E 2002 Changes in the extractability of cations (Ca, Mg and K) in the rhizosphere soil of Norway spruce (Picea abies) roots. Plant Soil 243, 209–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Y G, Smith S E and Smith F A 2001 Plant growth and cation composition of two cultivars of spring wheat (Triticum aestivumL.) differing in P uptake efficiency. J. Exp. Bot. 52, 1277–1282.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shi, W., Wang, X. & Yan, W. Distribution patterns of available P and K in rape rhizosphere in relation to genotypic difference. Plant and Soil 261, 11–16 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PLSO.0000035571.26352.99

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PLSO.0000035571.26352.99

Navigation