Skip to main content
Log in

An Atomic Force Microscopy Study of the Effect of Nanoscale Contact Geometry and Surface Chemistry on the Adhesion of Pharmaceutical Particles

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose. To understand differences in particle adhesion observed with increasing humidity between samples of salbutamol sulfate prepared by two different methods.

Methods. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) force measurements were performed as a function of humidity (<10% to 65% RH) using two systems. The first system used clean AFM tips against compressed disks of micronized and solution enhanced dispersion by supercritical fluid (SEDS) salbutamol. The second system involved particles of both salbutamol samples mounted onto the apexes of AFM cantilevers, and force measurements being performed against a highly orientated pyrolytic graphite (HOPG) substrate. Following these measurements, the contact asperities of the tips were characterized.

Results. The first system showed a maximum in the observed adhesion at 22% relative humidity (RH) for the SEDS salbutamol compared to 44% RH for the micronized salbutamol. The second system showed a mix of peaks and continual increases in adhesion with humidity. The predicted Johnson-Kendall-Roberts forces were calculated and divided by the actual forces in order to produce a ratio.

Conclusions. By relating the nature of the asperities to the force measurements, we propose a model in which adhesion scenarios range from single asperity nanometer-scale contact in which peaks in the adhesion were observed, to multiasperity contact where a continuous increase in adhesion was seen with humidity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. F. Podczeck, J. M. Newton, and M. B. James. The influence of constant and changing relative humidity of the air on the autoadhesion force between pharmaceutical powder particles. Int. J. Pharm. 145:221-229 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. N. Israelachvili. Intermolecular and Surface Forces, Academic Press Inc., London, UK, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  3. F. Podczeck. Particle-particle Adhesion in Pharmaceutical Powder Handling, Imperial College Press, London, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Marmur. Tip-surface capillary interactions. Langmuir 9:1922-1926 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. Jones, H. M. Pollock, J. A. S. Cleaver, and C. S. Hodges. adhesion forces between glass and silicon surfaces in air studied by afm: effects of relative humidity, particle size, roughness, and surface treatment. Langmuir 18:8045-8055 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  6. F. Podczeck. Assessment of the mode of adherence and the deformation characteristics of micronized particles adhering to various surfaces. Int. J. Pharm. 145:65-76 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  7. G. Binnig, C. F. Quate, and C. Gerber. Atomic force microscope. Phys. Rev. Lett. 56:930-933 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. K. Eve, N. Patel, S. Y. Luk, S. J. Ebbens, and C. J. Roberts. A study of single drug particle adhesion interactions using atomic force microscopy. Int. J. Pharm. 238:17-27 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. M. Young, R. Price, M. J. Tobyn, M. Buttrum, and F. Dey. Investigation into the effect of humidity on drug-drug interactions using the atomic force microscope. J. Pharm. Sci. 92:815-822 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. W. Tom and P. G. Debenedetti. Formation of bioerodible polymeric microspheres and microparticles by rapid expansion of supercritical solutions. Biotechnol. Prog. 7:403-411 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. York. Strategies for particle design using supercritical fluid technologies. PSTT 2:430-440 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. C. Hooton, C. S. German, S. Allen, M. C. Davies, C. J. Roberts, S. J. B. Tendler, and P. M. Williams. Characterization of particle interactions by atomic force microscopy: effect of contact area. Pharm. Res. 20:508-514 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. D. Kiely and D. A. Bonnell. Quantification of topographic structure by scanning probe microscopy. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 15:1483-1493 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. C. Feeley, P. York, B. S. Sumby, and H. Dicks. Comparison of the surface properties of salbutamol sulphate prepared by micronization and a supercritical fluid technique. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 50:S54(1998).

    Google Scholar 

  15. G. H. Ward and R. K. Schultz. Process-induced crystallinity changes in albuterol sulfate and its effect on powder physical stability. Pharm. Res. 12:773-779 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  16. K. L. Johnson, K. Kendall, and A. D. Roberts. Surface energy and the contact of elastic solids. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A 324:301-313 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  17. B. V. Derjaguin, V. M. Muller, and Y. P. Toporov. Effect of contact deformations on the adhesion of particles. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 53:314-326 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  18. D. M. Schaefer, M. Carpenter, B. Gady, R. Reifenberger, L. P. Demejo, and D. S. Rimai. Surface roughness and its influence on particle adhesion using atomic force techniques. J. Adhesion Sci. Technol. 9:1049-1062 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. He, A. S. Blum, D. E. Aston, C. Buenviaje, and R. M. Overney. Critical phenomena of water bridges in nanoasperity contacts. J. Chem. Phys. 114:1355-1360 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  20. L. Xu, A. Lio, J. Hu, D. F. Ogletree, and M. Salmeron. Wetting and capillary phenomena of water on mica. J. Phys. Chem. B 102:540-548 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  21. M. Binggeli and C. M. Mate. Influence of capillary condensation of water on nanotribology studied by force microscopy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 65:415-417 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. C. Coelho and N. Harnby. Moisture bonding in powders. Powder Technol. 20:201-205 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  23. N. A. Burnham, R. J. Colton, and H. M. Pollock. Interpretation of force curves in force microscopy. Nanotechnology 4:64-80 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  24. F. K. Dey, J. A. S. Cleaver, and P. A. Zhdan. Atomic force microscopy study of adsorbed moisture on lactose particles. Adv. Powder Technol. 11:401-413 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  25. J. Freund, J. Halbritter, and J. K. H. Horber. How dry are dried samples? water adsorption measured by STM. Micr. Res. Tech. 44:327-338 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  26. F. Podczeck, J. M. Newton, and M. B. James. Variations in the adhesion force between a drug and carrier particles as a result of changes in the relative humidity of the air. Int. J. Pharm. 149:151-160 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  27. V. Berard, E. Lesniewska, C. Andres, D. Pertuy, C. Laroche, and Y. Pourcelot. Affinity scale between a carrier and a drug in DPI studied by atomic force microscopy. Int. J. Pharm. 247:127-137 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  28. R. Price, P. M. Young, S. Edge, and J. N. Staniforth. The influence of relative humidity on particulate interactions in carrier-based dry powder inhaler formulations. Int. J. Pharm. 246:47-59 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  29. J. C. Hooton. PhD Thesis, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK, 2003.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clive J. Roberts.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hooton, J.C., German, C.S., Allen, S. et al. An Atomic Force Microscopy Study of the Effect of Nanoscale Contact Geometry and Surface Chemistry on the Adhesion of Pharmaceutical Particles. Pharm Res 21, 953–961 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHAM.0000029283.47643.9c

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PHAM.0000029283.47643.9c

Navigation