Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Impact of the National Endowment for the Arts in the United States: Institutional and Sectoral Effects on Private Funding

  • Published:
Journal of Cultural Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of the National Endowment for the Arts on private donations to the arts. The aim of the analysis is to assess whether public funding generates a crowding effect on private giving. We distinguish between institutional and sectoral crowding phenomena and discuss their possible implications.We used both a qualitative approach and an econometric model to estimate the effect of NEA introduction and appropriations on donations. Our results suggest that at the institutional level NEA grants do not generally induce donations to recipients while at the sectoral level appropriations and private giving are independent. The introduction of the agency appears to have caused a decrease in donations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AAFRC Trust for Philanthropy. (Various years) Giving U.S.A.. New York.

  • Abrams, B.A. and Schiff, M.D. (1978) “The ‘Crowding-Out Effect of Governmental Transfers on Private Charitable Contributions: Cross-Section Evidence”. National Tax Journal 10 (3): 190-213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrams, B.A. and Schmitz, M.D. (1986) “The ‘Crowding-Out’ Effect of Governmental Transfers on Private Charitable Contributions”, in Susan Rose-Ackerman (ed.), The Economics of Non-Profit Institutions. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Arts Alliance. (1995) “Myths and Facts about National Support of Arts and Culture”. Electronic Publication, http://www.tmm.com/0h/Artswire/www/aaa/myth.html

  • Bowen, W.G., Nygren, T.I., Turner, S.E., and Duffy, E.A. (1994) The Charitable Nonprofits. AnAnalysis of Institutional Dynamics and Characteristics. Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, A.C. (1999) “Do Public Subsidies Leverage Private Philanthropy for the Arts? Empirical Evidence on Symphony Orchestras”. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 28 (1): 32-45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton, A. and Schmitz, M. (1978) “The ‘Crowding-Out’ Effect of Governmental Transfers on Private Charitable Contributions”. Public Choice 33: 29-37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, A.C. (2000) “Is there a Dark Side to Government Support to Nonprofits?”. Public Administration Review 60 (3): 211-218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, M.S. (1993) “Restoring the ‘Public Persona’ of America's Arts”, in N. Weber and L. Renz (eds.), Arts Funding. A Report on Foundation and Corporate Grantmaking Trends. The Foundation Center, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clotfelter, C.T. (1985) Federal Tax Policy and Charitable Giving. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission on Foundations and Private Philanthropy. (1971) Foundations, Private Giving, and Public Policy; Report and Recommendations of the Commission on Foundations and Private Philanthropy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, K.M. and Devlin, R.A. (1996) “Volunteerism and Crowding Out: Canadian Econometric Evidence”. Canadian Journal of Economics 29 (1): 37-53.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. (1983) “Can Culture Survive the Marketplace?”, Journal of Arts Management and Law 13 (1): 67-71.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. (1986) Nonprofit Enterprise in the Arts: Studies in Mission and Constraint. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feld, A.L., O'Hare, M., and Schuster, J.M.D. (1983) Patrons Despite Themselves: Taxpayers and Arts Policy. New York University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W.H. (1997) Econometric Analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbrun, J. and Gray, C.M. (1993) The Economics of Art and Culture. An American Perspective. Cambridge University Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodsoll, F.S.M. (1984) “Supporting the Arts in the Eighties: The View from the National Endowment for the Arts”. Annals of American Academy of Political and Social Science 471: 84-88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofferbert, R.I. and Urice, J.K. (1985) “Small-Scale Policy: The Federal Stimulus versus Competing Explanations for State Funding of the Arts”. American Journal of Political Science 29 (2): 308-329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, P.N. and Luksetich, W. (1997) “The Relationship among Funding Sources for Art and History Museums”. Paper presented at ARNOVA, Indianapolis 1997.

  • Independent Sector. (1994) Giving and Volunteering in the United States: Findings from a National survey 1994 Edition. Independent Sector, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, J., Posnett, J., and Sandler, T. (1995) “Charity Donations in the U.K.: New Evidence Based on Panel Data”. Journal of Public Economics 56: 257-272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingma, B.R. (1989) “An Accurate Measurement of the Crowd-Out Effect, Income Effect, and Price Effect for Charitable Contributions”. Journal of Political Economy 97 (5): 1197-1207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kressner Cobb, N. (1995) Looking Ahead. Private Sector Giving to the Arts and the Humanities. Presidents Committee on the Arts and the Humanities, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey, L. and Steinberg, R. (1990) “Joint Crowdout: An Empirical Study of the Impact of Federal Grants on State Government Expenditures and Charitable Donations”. National Bureau of Economic Research. Working Paper No. 3226.

  • Mulcahy, K.V. (1992) “Government and the Arts in the United States”, in R.A. Smith and R. Berman (eds.), Public Policy and the Aesthetic Interest. University of Illinois Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulcahy, K.V. and Wyszomirski, M.J. (eds.) (1995) America' s Commitment to Culture. Westview Press, Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Endowment for the Arts. (Various years) Annual Reports. Washington D.C.

  • National Endowment for the Arts. (1998) NEA Strategic Plan 1999-2004. National Endowment for the Arts, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Endowment for the Arts. (2000) International Data on Government Spending on the Arts. Research Division Note #74. Washington D.C.

  • National Endowment for the Arts. (2002a) 2000 Annual Report. Washington D.C.

  • National Endowment for the Arts. (2002b) Appropriations History-Fiscal Years 1965-2001. Office of Policy Research and Analysis, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Netzer, D. (1978) The Subsidized Muse: Public Support for the Arts in the United States. Cambridge University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Hagan, J.W. (1998) The State and the Arts: An Analysis of Key Economic Policy Issues in Europe and the United States. Edward Elger Publishing, Northampton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paqué, K.H. (1982) “Do Public Transfers ‘Crowd out’ Private Charitable Giving? Some Econometric Evidence for the Federal Republic of Germany”. KielWorking Paper No. 152, University of Kiel.

  • Renz, L. and Atlas, C. (1999) Arts Funding 2000: Funder Perspectives on Current and Future Trends. The Foundation Center, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose-Ackerman, S. (1986) “Do Government Grants to Charity Reduce Private Donations?”, in S. Rose-Ackerman (ed.), The Economics of Nonprofit Institutions. Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiff, J. (1985) “Does Government Spending Crowd out Charitable Contributions?”. National Tax Journal 38 (4): 535-546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, J.M.D. (1985) “The Interrelationship between Public and Private Funding of the Arts in the United States”. The Journal of Arts Management and Law 14 (4): 77-105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, J.M.D. (1989) “Government Leverage of Private Support: Matching Grants and the Problem with ‘New’ Money”, in M. Wyszomirski and P. Clubb (eds.), The Cost of Culture. Patterns and Prospects of Private Arts Patronage. ACA Books, American Council for the Arts, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, R. (1992) “Democracy and Excellence”, in R.A. Smith and R. Berman (eds.), Public Policy and the Aesthetic Interest. University of Illinois Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T.M. (2002) “Crowding in or Crowding Out: The Effect of NEA Grants on the Contributions to Nonprofit Dance Companies”, Paper presented at the 12th International Conference on Cultural Economics, Rotterdam.

  • Swain, R.C. (1982) “The National Endowment for the Arts: 1965-1980”, in K.V. Mulcahy and R.C. Swain (eds.), Public Policy and the Arts. Westview Press, Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tax Foundation. (1988) Facts and Figures on Government Finance, 1988-89 Edition. Washington D.C.

  • Urice, J.K. (1990) “Government Support for the Arts in the United States, 1990-2015: A Forecast”, in D.B. Pankratz and V.B. Morris (eds.), The Future of the Arts. Praeger, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyszomirski, M.J. and Mulcahy, K.V. (1995) “The Organization of Public Support for the Arts”, in K.V. Mulcahy and M.J. Wyszomirski (eds.), America's Commitment to Culture. Westview Press, Boulder.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Social Policy, The London School of Economics, Houghton Street, London, WC2A 2AE, U.K

    Francesca Borgonovi

  2. Goldman School of Public Policy, University of California, Berkeley, 2607 Hearst Ave. #7320, Berkeley, CA, 94720-7320, U.S.A

    Michael O'Hare

Authors
  1. Francesca Borgonovi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael O'Hare
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Borgonovi, F., O'Hare, M. The Impact of the National Endowment for the Arts in the United States: Institutional and Sectoral Effects on Private Funding. Journal of Cultural Economics 28, 21–36 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JCEC.0000009823.76834.64

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JCEC.0000009823.76834.64

Search

Navigation