Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of selection strategies for wheat adaptation across water regimes

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Drought frequently constrains production of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), but development of tolerant cultivars is hampered by low heritability for drought tolerance and a lack of effective selection strategies. Our objective was to identify an optimum selection regime for wheat in drought-prone environments. Six-hundred entries derived from 10 crosses were developed by selection under continuous high moisture, alternating high with low moisture, alternating low with high moisture, and continuous low moisture conditions for five generations. The selections were evaluated in two low-yield, a medium-yield, and a high-yield environment in the Yaqui Valley, Sonora, Mexico. The mean performance of entries derived from a particular selection regime was dependant on the stress level of the evaluation environment. Lines developed and selected under continuous high moisture and continuous low-moisture regimes produced the highest mean yields in the low moisture evaluation environment. There was no relationship between continuous selection under either high yielding conditions or low yielding conditions and the mean performance of the resultant lines in their respective high and low yielding evaluation environments. The mean yield of lines selected using the alternating high/low moisture regime as well as the five highest yielding lines were superior in the HY environment, and had similar performance with other regimes under the low yielding evaluation environment. Our results indicate that alternating selection between high and low yielding environments is the most effective way to develop wheat germplasm adapted to environments where intermittent drought occurs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blum, A., 1996. Constitutive traits affecting plant performance under stress. In: G.O. Edmeades, M. Bänzinger, H.R. Mickelson & C.B. Peñ a-Valdivia (Eds.), Developing Drought-and Low Nitrogen-Tolerant Maize, pp. 131-135. CIMMYT, Mexico, D.F.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandshaw, A.D., 1965. Evolutionary significance of phenotypic plasticity in plants. Adv Genet 13: 115-155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, H., W.H. Pfeiffer & W.G. Pollmer, 1992. Environments for selecting widely adapted spring wheat. Crop Sci 32: 1420-1427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boubaker, M., 1997. High vs. low stress yield test environments for identifying drought tolerant durum wheat cultivars. Tropicultura 15: 18-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruckner, P.L. & R.C. Frohberg, 1987a. Stress tolerance and adaptation in spring wheat. Crop Sci 27: 31-36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruckner, P.L. & R.C. Frohberg, 1987b. Rate and duration of grain fill in spring wheat. Crop Sci 27: 451-455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, P.F., J. Bolanos, G.O. Edmeades & D.L. Eaton, 1995. Gains from selection under drought versus multilocation testing in related tropical maize populations. Crop Sci 35: 63-69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, D.S., G. Gebeyehu, A. Miranda, S. Rajaram & M. Van Ginkel, 1994. Choosing evaluation environments to increase wheat grain yield under drought conditions. Crop Sci 34: 673-678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceccarelli, S., 1989. Wide adaptation: How wide? Euphytica 40: 197-205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceccarelli, S., S. Grando & A. Impiglia, 1998. Choice of selection strategy in breeding barley for stress environments. Euphytica 103: 307-318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, M., R.E. Stucker, I.H. DeLacy & B.D. Harch, 1997. Wheat breeding nurseries, target environments, and indirect selection for grain yield. Crop Sci 37: 1168-1176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, T.S., R.G. Sears, R.K. Bequette & T.J. Martin, 1995. Germplasm enhancement in winter wheat × Triticum tauchii backcross populations. Crop Sci 35: 913-919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donmez, E., R.G. Sears, J.P. Shroyer & G.M. Paulsen, 2001. Genetic gain in yield attributes of winter wheat in the Great Plains. Crop Sci 41: 1412-1419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duvick, D.N., 1992. Genetic contributions to advances in yield of US maize. Maydica 37: 69-79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edhaie, B., J.G. Waines & A.E. Hall, 1988. Differential responses of landrace and improved spring wheat genotypes to stress environments. Crop Sci 28: 838-842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, D.S., 1952. The problem of environment and selection. Am Nat 86: 293-298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finlay, K.W., 1968. The significance of adaptation in wheat breeding. In: K.W. Finlay & K.W. Shephard (Eds.), Proc 3rd IntWheat Genet Symp, pp. 403-409. Aust Acad Sci, Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, R.A. & R. Maurer, 1978. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield responses. Aust J Agric Res 29: 897-912.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamblin, J., H.M. Fisher & H.I. Ridings, 1980. The choice of locality for plant breeding when selecting for high yield and general adaptation. Euphytica 29: 161-168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heine, H. & W.E. Weber, 1982. The significance of statistical parameters for the phenotypic stability in official variety trials of winter wheat and maize. Z Pflanzenzücht 89: 89-99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innes, P. & S.A. Quarrie, 1987. Water relations. In: F.G.H. Lupton (Ed.), Wheat Breeding, Its Scientific Basis, pp. 313-337. Chapman Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keim, D.L. & W.E. Kronstad, 1979. Drought resistance and dryland adaptation in winter wheat. Crop Sci 19: 574-576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ketata, H., 1987. Actual and potential yields of cereal crops in moisture-limited environments. In: J.P. Shrivastava, E. Porceddu, E. Acevedo & S. Varma (Eds.), Drought Tolerance in Winter Cereals, pp. 55-61. John Wiley and Sons, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, M.M. & M.A. McMahon, 1988. A perspective of research needs for non-irrigated tropical conditions. In: A.R. Klatt (Ed.), Wheat Production Constraints in Tropical Environments, pp 330-347. CIMMYT, Mexico, D.F.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laing, D.R. & R.A. Fischer, 1979. Adaptation of semi-dwarf wheat cultivars to rainfed conditions. Euphytica 26: 129-139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metzger, D.D., S.J. Czaplewski & D.C. Rasmousson, 1984. Grain filling duration and yield in spring barley. Crop Sci 24: 1101-1105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliam, J.R., 1989. The dimensions of drought. In: F.W.G. Baker (Ed.), Drought Resistance in Cereals, pp. 1-11. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passioura, J.B., 1986. Resistance to drought and salinity: Avenues for improvement. Aust J Plant Physiol 13: 191-201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer, W.H., K.D. Sayre, S. Rajaram & T.S. Payne, 1989. Empirical approaches to breeding for drought stress. In: Agronomy Abstracts, pp. 95. ASA, Madison, WI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajaram, S., H.J. Braun & M. Van Ginkel, 1996. CIMMYT's approach to breed for drought tolerance. Euphytica 92: 147-153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R.A., 1996. Defining selection criteria to improve yield under drought. Plant Growth Regulation 20: 157-166.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, N.N. & B.R. Murty, 1970. A selection procedure in wheat for stress environments. Euphytica 19: 509-521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute, 1990. SAS Users Guide. Statistics (Version 6.0). SAS Inst. Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimdt, J.W., 1983. Drought resistance and wheat breeding. Agric Water Manag 7: 181-194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmonds, N.W., 1991. Selection for local adaptation in plant breeding programme. Theor Appl Genet 82: 363-367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slafer, G.A. & J.L. Araus, 1998. Improving wheat responses to abiotic stresses. In: A.E. Slinkard (Ed.), Proc 9th Int Wheat Genet Symp. University of Saskatchewan, pp. 201-213. Saskatoon, Saskatchewan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M.E., W.R. Coffman & T.C. Baker, 1990. Environmental effects on selection under high and low-input conditions, pp. 261-272. In: M.S. Kang (Ed.), Genotype-by-Environment Interaction and Plant Breeding. Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. Pierre, C.A., H.R. Klinch & F.M. Gauthier, 1967. Early generation selection under different environments as it influences adaptation of barley. Can J Plant Sci 47: 507-517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trethowan, R.M., J. Crossa, M. van Ginkel & S. Rajaram, 2001. Relationships among bread wheat international yield testing locations in dry areas. Crop Sci 41: 1461-1469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trethowan, R.M., M. van Ginkel, K. Ammar, J. Crossa, B. Cukadar, S. Rajaram & E. Hernandez, 2003. Associations among twenty years of bread wheat yield evaluation environments. Crop Sci 43: 1698-1711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Ginkel, M., D.S. Calhoun, G. Gebeyehu, A. Miranda, C. Tianyu, R.P. Lara, R.M. Trethowan, K. Sayre, J. Crossa & S. Rajaram, 1998. Plant traits related to yield of wheat in early, late or continuous drought conditions. Euphytica 100: 109-121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kirigwi, F., van Ginkel, M., Trethowan, R. et al. Evaluation of selection strategies for wheat adaptation across water regimes. Euphytica 135, 361–371 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EUPH.0000013375.66104.04

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EUPH.0000013375.66104.04

Navigation