Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative Toxicological Evaluation of Untreated and Treated Tannery Effluent with Nostoc Muscorum L. (Algal Assay) and Microtox Bioassay

  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relative sensitivity of tannery effluent before and after treatment was compared by employing Nostoc muscorum and microtox assay in laboratory. The effect on chlorophyll, protein and biomass content of Nostoc muscorum was studied with the luminescent property inhibition of Photobacterium phosphorium and compared with algal bioassay. The results of microtox assay after 5, 15 and 30 min of exposure were compared with data obtained from algal bioassay. It was observed that the luminescent property of Photobacterium phosphorium in microtox assay as well as the chlorophyll content of Nostoc muscorum in algal assay were the most sensitive parameters in toxicity evaluation of tannery effluent. The microtox assay produced notably comparable EC50 values with that of algalbioassay. The microtox assay of toxicity showed that EC50 (%) in 30 min was 3.19 and 63.49 for untreated and treated tannery effluent, respectively while in algal bioassay the EC50 for chlorophyll was in between 0–2.5% and 100%, respectively, in untreated and treated effluent. More than 60% reduction of toxicity was noted in treated tannery effluent in both test system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander, M.: 1995, ‘How toxic are chemicals in soil’, Environ. Sci. Technol. 29, 2713–2713.

    Google Scholar 

  • APHA: 1992, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 18th ed., American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnon, D. I.: 1949, ‘Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasti polyphenol oxidase in Beta vulgaris’, Plant Physiol. 24, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Athey, L. A., Thomas, J. M., Miller, W. E. and Word, J. Q.: 1989, ‘Evaluation of bioassys for designing sediment cleanup strategies at a wood treatment site’, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 7, 223–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Backhaus, T. and Grimme, L. H.: 1999, ‘The toxicity of antibiotics agents to the luminescent bacterium Vibrio fischeri’, Chemosphere 38(14), 3291–3301.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baun, A., Kasper, B., Justesen, Niels Nyholm: 2002, ‘Algal tests with soil suspensions and eutriates: A comparative evaluation for PAH contaminated soils’, Chemosphere 46, 251–258.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blaise, C. R.: 1986, ‘Micromethod for acute aquatic toxicity assessment using the green alga Selenastrum capricornutum’, Toxicity Assessment: Inter. Quart. 1, 377–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boluda, R., Quintanills, J. E., Bonilla, T. A., Saez, E. and Gamon, M.: 2002, ‘Application of the Microtox® test and pollution indices to the study of water toxicity in the Albufera Natural Park (Valencia, Spain)’, Chemosphere 46, 355–369.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brierley, C. L. and Brierley, J. A.: 1993, in A. E. Torma, M. L. Apel and C. L. Brierley (eds), Biohydrometallurgical Technologies, 2. The Minerals, Metals and Materials Society, Warrendale, PA, pp. 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bringmann, G. and Kuhn, R.: 1978a, ‘Testing of substances for their toxicity threshold: Model organisms Microcystis (Diplocystis) aeruginosa and Scenedesmus quadricauda’, Mitt. Int. Ver. Theor. Angew. Limnol. 21, 275–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundy, J. G., Wardell, J. L., Campbell, C. D., Killham, K. and Paton, G. I.: 1997, ‘Application of bioluminescence-based microbial biosensors to the ecotoxicity assessment of organotins’, Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 25, 353–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, Richard, N., Ansar, A. and Qureshi: 1985, ‘Microtox and Spirillum volutang tests for assessing toxicity of environmental samples’, Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 35, 443–451.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dutka B. J. and Kwan K. K.: 1981, ‘Comparison of three microbial toxicity screening tests with the Microtox test’, Bull. Environm. Contam. Toxicol. 27, 753–757.

    Google Scholar 

  • EPA: 1993, Methods for Aquatic Toxicity Identification Evaluations: Phase II Toxicity Identification Procedures for Samples Exhibiting Acute and Chromic Toxicity.

  • Guzzella, L.: 1998, ‘Comparition of tests procedures for sediments toxicity evaluation with Vibrio fischeri bacteria’, Chemosphere 37(14–15), 2895–2909.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harkey, G. A., Landrum, P. F. and Klaine, S. J.: 1994, ‘Comparison of whole-sediment, elutriate and pore-water exposures for use in assessing sediment associated organic contaminants in bioassays’, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 13(8), 1315–1329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joubert, G.: 1980, ‘A bioassay application for quantitative toxicity measurements using the green alga Selenastrum capricornutum’, Water Res. 14, 1759–1763.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, K. L. E., Lum, K. R. and Palabrica, V. S.: 1988, ‘Review of field applications of the microtox test in great lakes and Saint Lawrence river water’, Water Pollut. Res. J. Canada 23(2), 270–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khasim, I. D. and Nand Kumar, N. V.: 1989, ‘Environmental contamination of chromium in agricultural and animal products near a chromate industry’, Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 43, 742–746.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kotrba, P., Doleckova, L., De Lorenzo, V. and Ruml, T.: 1999, ‘Enhanced bioaccumulation of heavy metals ions by bacterial cells due to surface display of short metal binding peptides’, Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65(1), 1098–1098.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowry, O. H., Rosenbrough, N. J., Farr, P. A. L. and Randall, R. J.: 1951, ‘Protein measurement with folin phenol reagent’, J. Biol. Chem. 193, 265–275.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W. E., Peterson, S. A., Greene, J. C. and Callahan, C. A.: 1985, ‘Comparative toxicology of laboratory organisms for assessing hazardous waste site’, J. Environ. Qual. 14, 569–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development): 1984, OECD Guidelines for the testing of chemicals I. Head of Publications Service OECD 2 rue Andrepascal 75775 PARIS CEDEX 16 France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okino, S., Iwasaki, K., Yagi, O. and Tanaka, H.: 2000, ‘Development of a biological mercury removal recovery system’, Biotechnol. Lett. 22, 783–788.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prakasham, R. S., Sheno Merrie, J., Sheela, R., Sawathi, N. and Rama Krishna, S. V.: 1999, ‘Biosorption of chromium VI by free and immobilized Rhizopus arrhizus’, Environ. Pollut. 104, 421–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qureshi, A. A., Coleman, R. N. and Paran, J. H.: 1984, ‘Evaluation and Refinement of the Microtox Test for Use in Toxicity Screening’, in D. Liu and B. J. Dutka (eds), Toxicity Screening Procedures using Bacterial System, Marcel Dekker, New York, pp. 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rai, U. N. and Chandra, P.: 1989, ‘Removal of heavy metals from polluted water by Hydrodictyon reticulatum (Linn.) Lagerheim’, Sci. Total Environ. 87(88), 509–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribo, J. M.: 1987, ‘Interlaboratory comparison studies of the luminescent bacteria toxicity bioassay’, Environ. Toxicol. Water Qual. 12(4), 283–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, M. J., Lopez-Jaramillo, L., Redondo, M. J. and Font, G.: 1997, ‘Toxicity assessment of pesticides using the microtox test: Application to environmental samples’, Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 59, 619–625.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Safferman, R. S. and Morris, M. E.: 1964, ‘Growth characteristics of the blue green algal virus LPP-1’, J. Bacteriol. 88, 771–775.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. M., Skalshi, J. R., Cline, J. F., McShane, M. C., Simpson, J. C., Miller, W. E., Peterson, S. A., Callahan, C. A. and Greene, J. C.: 1986, ‘Characterization of chemical waste site contamination and determination of its extent using bioassays’, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 5, 487–501.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chandra, R., Pandey, P.K. & Srivastava, A. Comparative Toxicological Evaluation of Untreated and Treated Tannery Effluent with Nostoc Muscorum L. (Algal Assay) and Microtox Bioassay. Environ Monit Assess 95, 287–294 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EMAS.0000029909.87977.a5

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EMAS.0000029909.87977.a5

Navigation