Skip to main content
Log in

Reproductive Performance of Crossbred Dairy Cows in Different Production Systems in the Central Highlands of Ethiopia

  • Published:
Tropical Animal Health and Production Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study was conducted to examine the fertility status of crossbred dairy cows in mixed crop-livestock production (MCLP), market-oriented specialized dairy production (MSDP) and urban dairy production (UDP) systems, including the Holetta Agricultural Research Center (HARC). Data on general farm management variables and reproductive histories were collected from study farms by questionnaire and from individual cow records. Age at first service and age at first calving were 29.58 months (n = 424) and 40.6 months (n = 348), respectively. Cows managed under UDP were younger at first service and at first calving (p<0.05). The mean intervals from calving to first service and to conception were 141.98 days (n = 284) and 185.02 days (n = 219), respectively. The mean calving interval for cows was 551.82 days (n = 258). Cows in MCLP had longer intervals from calving to first service and to conception and longer calving intervals than those managed under MSDP, UDP and HARC. First service conception rate (43.42%), number of services per conception (1.75) and pregnancy rate (79.29%) did not differ significantly between production systems. Reproductive performance was best in UDP followed by HARC and MSDP. The difference between MCLP and the rest points to particular difficulties in that system. To improve reproductive performance and economic benefit, there should be conservative stocking rate, sensible year-round feeding, a herd health plan, and sustainable extension service.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Alberro, M., 1983. Comparative performance of F1 Friesian × Zebu heifers in Ethiopia. Animal Production, 37, 247-252

    Google Scholar 

  • ESAP (Ethiopian Society of Animal Production), 1995. Ruminant livestock development strategy. Newsletter of the Ethiopian Society of Animal Production (ESAP), vol. 3,no. 1 and 2, (Addis Ababa, Ethiopia)

  • FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization), 1993. Ethiopia-Livestock Sector Development Project, Preparation report no. 24/93 CP-ETH 45SR, (Investment Centre FAO/World Bank Cooperative Programme, 18 February 1993)

  • Galal, E.S.E., Kebede, B. and Tegegne, A., 1981. A study on the reproduction of local zebu and F1 crossbreed cows. II. Age at first calving and calf production. Ethiopian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 3, 87-95

    Google Scholar 

  • Gryseels, G. and Anderson, F.M., 1983. Research on farm and livestock productivity in the central Ethiopian highlands. International Livestock Centre for Africa (ILCA), Research Report No. 4, 1-52

  • ILCA (International Livestock Centre for Africa), 1994. Annual Report and Program Highlights, (International Livestock Centre for Africa, Addis Ababa), 106

    Google Scholar 

  • Kassa, T., 1990. Postpartum reproductive activity of indigenous Zebu and Friesian crossed with Zebu crossbred cows in Ethiopian Central Highlands. Ethiopia Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 12, 45-52

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayongo-Male, H., Karue, C.N. and Mutiga, E.R., 1982. The effect of preconception supplementation on the productivity of dairy heifers grazed on medium quality pasture under East African conditions. Bulletin of Animal Health and Production in Africa, 30, 65-72

    Google Scholar 

  • Kebede, B., 1992. Estimation of additive and non additive genetic effects for growth, milk yield and reproduction traits of crossbred (Bos taurus × Bos inducus) cattle in the wet and dry environments in Ethiopia, (Cornell University, NY, dissertation)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiwuwa, G.H., Trail, J.C.M., Kurtu, M.Y., Worku, G., Anderson, F.M. and Durkin, J., 1983. Crossbred dairy cattle productivity in Arsi Region, Ethiopia. International Livestock Centre for Africa (ILCA), Research Report No. 11, 1-29

  • McDowell, R.E., 1972. Improvement of Livestock Production under Warm Climates, (W.H. Freeman, San Francisco)

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, R.E., 1988. Appropriate technology to enhance livestock production in the tropics. Proceedings, 2nd National Livestock Improvement Conference, (IAR, Addis Ababa), 6-16

    Google Scholar 

  • Mekonnen, H.M. and Goshu, M., 1987. Reproductive performance of Fogera cattle and their Friesian crosses. Ethiopian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 9, 96-114

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukasa-Mugerwa, E., 1989. A Review of Reproductive Performance of Female Bos indicus (Zebu) Cattle, ILCA Monograph No. 6, (International Livestock Centre for Africa, Addis Ababa)

    Google Scholar 

  • Obese, F.Y., Okantah, S.A., Oddoye, E.O.K. and Gyawu, P., 1999. Post-partum reproductive performance of Sanga cattle in smallholder peri-urban dairy herds in the Accra plains of Ghana. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 31, 181-190

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS (1989). Statistical Analysis System, version 6.12, (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tegegne, A., 1989. Reproductive development and function in Zebu and crossbred cattle in Ethiopia, (James Cook University, Melbourne, dissertation)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tegegne, A., Galal, E.S.E. and Kebede, B., 1981. A study on the reproduction of local zebu and F1 crossbred (European × Zebu) cows. I. Number of services per conception, gestation length and days open till conception. Ethiopian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 3, 1-14

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shiferaw, Y., Tenhagen, BA., Bekana, M. et al. Reproductive Performance of Crossbred Dairy Cows in Different Production Systems in the Central Highlands of Ethiopia. Tropical Animal Health and Production 35, 551–561 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027377722576

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027377722576

Navigation