Skip to main content
Log in

The impact of the university context on European students' learning approaches and learning environment preferences

  • Published:
Higher Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article describesexperiences of 610 Dutch students and 241students from other European countries whostudied at least three months abroad within theframework of an international exchange program.The Dutch students went to a university inanother European country and the foreignstudents went to a Dutch university. By meansof a questionnaire students' perceptions ofthree main characteristics of the universitylearning environment were measured concerningthe home university, the host university andthe ideal learning environment. The studentswere also asked about their way of learning atthe home university and at the host university,in particular about the extent of constructivelearning and reproductive learning. Evidencewas found for the influence of aspects of thelearning environment on the two learningapproaches; e.g., a learning environmentcharacterized as student-oriented discouragesreproductive learning and promotes constructivelearning, especially when conceptual andepistemological relations within the learningdomain are stressed. The learning environmentpreferences of the students were partly relatedto their learning orientations at the homeuniversity, but they were strikingly similarfor students from different countries. Therewas a strong preference for those learningenvironment aspects that promote constructivelearning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ajisuksmo, C.R.P. (1996). Self-regulated Learning in Indonesian Higher Education. Jakarta: Atma Jaya Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J.B. and Rhin, B.A. (1984). 'The effects of intervention on deep and surface approaches to learning', in Kirby, J.R. (ed.), Cognitive Strategies and Educational Performance.London: Academic Press, pp. 279-293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busato, V.V, Prins, F.J., Elshout, J.J. and Hamaker, C. (1998). 'Learning styles: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study in higher educatio', British Journal of Educational Psychology 63, 3-19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. and Cohen, P. (1985). Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eley, M.G. (1992). 'Differential adoption of study approaches within individual students', Higher Education 23, 231-254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N.J. (1991). 'Approaches to learning and perceptions of the learning environment-Introduction of the special issue', Higher Education 22, 201-204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Entwistle, N.J. and Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding Student Learning. London: Croom Helm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evers, B. (1995). Learning Environments Perceptions and Learning Strategies of Exchange Students in The Netherlands [in Dutch]. Department of Psychology, Tilburg University.

  • Fraser, B.J. (1994). 'Research on classroom and school climate', in Gabel, D. (ed.), Handbook of Research on Science Teaching And Learning. New York: Macmillan, pp. 493-541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, B.J. (1998). 'Science learning environments: Assessment, effects and determinants', in Fraser, B.J. and Tobin, K.G. (eds.), International Handbook of Science Education.Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer, pp. 527-564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gow, L. and Kember, D. (1990). 'Does higher education promote independent learning?' Higher Education 19, 307-322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1986). 'Cultural differences in teaching and learning', International Journal of Intercultural Relations 10, 301-320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1991). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. London: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1996). 'Differences and danger: Cultural profiles of nations and limits to tolerance', Higher Education in Europe 21(1), 73-94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollanders, N. (1995). Steering of Learning Processes [in Dutch]. Department of Educational Sciences, Utrecht University.

  • Huijbregts, S.M. and Roepers, H. (1995). Studying Abroad [in Dutch]. Department of Educational Sciences, Utrecht University.

  • Kerlinger, F.N. and Pedhazur, E.J. (1973). Multiple Regression in Behavioural Research.New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lonka. K. (1997). Explorations of Constructive Processes in Student Learning. Doctoral thesis. Department of Psychology, University of Helsinki.

  • Marton, F., Hounsell, D. and Entwistle, N. (eds.) (1984). The Experience of Learning.Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J.H.F. and Muller, M.W. (1990). 'Evaluating the quality of student learning. 1-An unfolding analysis of the association between perceptions of learning context and approaching to studying at an individual level', Studies in Higher Education 15(2), 131-154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J.H.F. and Parsons, P. (1989). 'Approaches to studying and course perceptions using the Lancaster Inventory-a comparative study', Studies in Higher Education 14(2), 137-153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newble, D.I. and Entwistle, N.J. (1986). 'Learning styles and approaches: Implications for medical education', Medical Education 20, 162-175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltonen, A. and Niemivirta, M. (1999). Motivation, Self-regulation and Perception of the Learning Environment. Paper presented at the 8th European Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction, Gothenburg.

  • Ramsden, P. (1988). 'Context and strategy-Situational influences on learning', in Schmeck, R.R. (ed.), Learning Strategies and Learning Styles. Perspectives on Individual Differ-ences.New York: Plenum Press, pp. 159-184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to Teach in Higher Education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J.T.E. (2000). Researching Student Learning: Approaches to Studying in Campus-based and Distance Education. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaats, A., Lodewijks, H.G.L.C. and Van der Sanden, J.M.M. (1999). 'Learning styles in secondary vocational education: Disciplinary differences', Learning and Instruction 9(5), 475-492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K., Kahle, J.B. and Fraser, B.J. (eds.) (1990). Windows into Science Classes: Problems Associated with Higher Level Cognitive Functioning. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trigwell, K., Prosser, M. and Lyons, F. (1997). Defining Good Teaching: Relations between Teachers' Approaches to Teaching and Student Learning. Paper presented at the 7th conference of the European Association for Research in Learning and Instruction, Athens.

  • Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., Ramsden, P. and Martin, E. (1999a). Relations Between the Way Students Approach Learning, Their Teachers' Approaches to Teaching and the Course Experience Questionnaire. Paper presented at the conference of the European Association for Research in Learning and Instruction, Goteborg.

  • Trigwell, K., Prosser, M. and Waterhouse, F. (1999b). 'Relations between teachers' approaches to teaching and students' approaches to learning', Higher Education 37, 57-70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermetten, Y.J., Lodewijks, H.G. and Vermunt, J.D. (1999a). 'Consistency and variability of learning strategies in different university courses', Higher Education 37, 1-21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermetten, Y., Lodewijks, J. and Vermunt, J. (1999b). The Role of Personality Traits and Goal Orientation in Strategy Use. Manuscript submitted to Contemporary Educational Psychology, also in Vermetten, Y. Consistency and variability of student learning in higher education. Doctoral Dissertation, Tilburg University.

  • Vermetten, Y., Vermunt, J. and Lodewijks, J. (1999c). 'A longitudinal perspective on learning strategies in higher education-Different viewpoints towards development', British Journal of Educational Psychology 69, 221-242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermunt, J.D. (1996). 'Metacognitive, cognitive and affective aspects of learning styles and strategies: A phenomenographic analysis', Higher Education 31, 25-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermunt, J.D. (1998). 'The regulation of constructive learning processes', British Journal of Educational Psychology 68, 149-171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermunt, J.D. and Verloop, N. (1999). 'Congruence and friction between learning and teaching', Learning and Instruction 9, 257-280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wierstra, R.F.A. and Beerends, E.P.M. (1996). 'Learning environment perceptions and learning strategies of first year social sciences students (in Dutch)', Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch 21(4), 306-322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wierstra, R.F.A., Kanselaar, G., Van der Linden, J.L. and Lodewijks, H.G.L.C. (1999).'Learning environment perceptions of European university students', Learning Environ-ments Research 2, 79-98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wierstra, R.F.A. and Wubbels, Th. (1994). 'Student perception and appraisal of the learning environment: Core concepts in the evaluation of the PLON physics curriculum', Studies in Educational Evaluation 20, 437-455.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronny F.A. Wierstra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wierstra, R.F., Kanselaar, G., van der Linden, J.L. et al. The impact of the university context on European students' learning approaches and learning environment preferences. Higher Education 45, 503–523 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023981025796

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023981025796

Navigation