Abstract
Complexity theory shares a common vocabulary with systems theory. Terms such as emergence, complexity, and adaptation appear in both traditions. Despite the similarities, complexity theory is not a misnomer for systems theory. Several points of departure exist in complexity's research agenda and methods. Moreover, while systems theory appears to have embraced interpretivist and critical philosophies, complexity theory remains firmly in the positivist camp, despite claims that it is a postmodern science.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Brocklesby, J., and Cummings, S. (1996). Foucault plays Habermas: An alternative philosophical underpinning for critical systems thinking. J. Operat. Res. Soc. 47 741–754
Checkland, P. (1995). Model validation in soft systems practice. Syst. Res. 12 47–54.
Checkland, P. B. (1972). Towards a systems-based methodology for real-world problem-solving. J. Syst. Eng. 3 87–116.
Checkland, P. B. (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice Wiley, Chichester.
Cohen, K. J., and Cyert, R. M. (1961). Computer models in dynamic economics. Q. J. Econ. 75 112–127.
Drogoul, A., and Ferber, J. (1994). Multi-agent simulation as a tool for studying emergent processes in societies. In Gilbert N., and Doran, J. (eds.), Simulating Societies: The Computer Simulation of Social Phenomena UCL Press, London, pp. 127–142.
Flood, R. L. (1990). Liberating systems theory: Toward critical systems thinking. Hum. Relat. 43 49–75.
Flood, R. L., and Carson, E. R. (1988). Dealing with Complexity: An Introduction to the Theory and Application of Systems Science Plenum Press, New York.
Garfinkel, A., Spano, M. L., Ditto, W. L., and Weiss, J. (1992). Issues in controlling cardiac chaos. Science 257 1230.
Goldberg, D. E. (1989). Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine Learning Addison-Wesley, New York.
Gross, P. R., and Levitt, N. (1994). Higher Superstition: The Academic Left and Its Quarrels with Science Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Holland, J. H., and Miller, J. H. (1991). Artificial adaptive agents in economic theory. Am. Econ. Rev. 81 365–370.
Holland, J. H., Holyoak, K. J., Nisbett, R. E., and Thagard, P. R. (1986). Induction: Processes of Inference, Learning and Discovery MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Lakatos, I., and Musgrave, A. (eds.) (1970). Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge Cambridge University Press, London.
Lorenz, E. (1963). Deterministic nonperiodic flow. J. Atmos. Sci. 20 130–141.
Lyotard, J.-F. (1983). Answering the question: What is postmodernism? In Hassan, H., and Hassan, S. (eds.), Innovation/Renovation University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, pp. 71–82.
McKelvey, B. (1997). Quasi-natural organization science. Org. Sci. 8 351–380.
Mikulecky, D. C. (1998). A close look at a new science: Chaos as science or science in chaos, Working Paper, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond. [Available: http://views.vcu.edu/~mikuleck/chaos2.htm (Dec. 4, 1998).]
Morecroft, J. D. W. (1985). Rationality in the analysis of behavioral simulation models. Manage. Sci. 31 900–916.
Newell, A., and Simon, H. A. (1972). Human Problem Solving Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Phelan, S. E. (1995). From chaos to complexity in strategic planning. Paper presented at the 55th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Vancouver.
Phelan, S. E. (1997). Using Artificial Adaptive Agents to Explore Strategic Landscapes Ph.D. dissertation, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Price, B. (1997). The myth of postmodern science. In Eve, R. A., Horsfall, S., and Lee, M. E. (eds.), Chaos, Complexity and Sociology: Myths, Models, and Theories Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 3–14.
Rocha, L. M. (1997). Evidence Sets and Contextual Genetic Algorithms: Exploring Uncertainty, Context, and Embodiment in Cognitive and Biological Systems Ph.D. dissertation, State University of New York.
Sokal, A. D., and Bricmont, J. (1998). Fashionable Nonsense: Postmodern Intellectuals' Abuse of Science St. Martin's Press, New York.
Stacey, R. D. (1991). The Chaos Frontier: Creative Strategic Control for Business Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.
Tsoukas, H. (1992). Panoptic reason and the search for totality: A critical assessment of the critical systems perspective. Hum. Relat. 45 637–657.
von Foerster, H. (1984). On constructing a reality. In von Foerster, H. (ed.), Observing Systems Intersystems, Seaside, CA, pp. 288–309.
von Glasersfeld, E. (1991). Knowing without metaphysics: Aspects of the radical constructivist position. In Steier, F. (ed.), Research and Reflexivity Sage, London.
Vriend, N. J. (1994). Self-organized markets in a decentralized economy, Working Paper 94-03-013, Sante Fe Institute, Sante Fe, NM.
Waldrop, M. M. (1992). Complexity: The Emerging Science at the Edge of Order and Chaos Penguin Books, London.
Yates, F. E. (1978). Complexity and the limits to knowledge. Am. J. Physio. 4 201–204.
Zwick, M. (1997). Complexity theory and systems theory. Paper presented at the International Institute for General Systems Studies, Second Workshop, San Marcos, TX.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Phelan, S.E. A Note on the Correspondence Between Complexity and Systems Theory. Systemic Practice and Action Research 12, 237–246 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022495500485
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022495500485