Skip to main content
Log in

High chromosomal variability of mandarins (Citrus spp.) revealed by CMA banding

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fluorochrome staining with chromomycin A3(CMA) was used to characterize and compare the CMA banding patterns of chromosomes in 17 accessions of mandarins (Citrus spp.). All accessions had 2n = 18 chromosomes. These chromosomes were classified into six types based on the number and position of CMA positive bands; A: two telomeric and one proximal band, B: one telomeric and one proximal band, C: two telomeric bands, D: one telomeric band, E: without bands, F: one proximal band. Each accession possessed two to five types of chromosomes, and showed unique CMA banding patterns. Type D and E chromosomes were predominant in all accessions. Their numbers were generally higher in Chinese and Indian mandarins. Type F chromosome was present only in some mandarins originating in Japan, which could thus be distinguished from mandarins originating in other areas. This study is the first report of type F chromosome in citrus. The Vietnamese mandarins we studied were the only one shaving type A, B, C, D and E chromosomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barrett, H.C. & A.M. Rhodes, 1976. A numerical taxonomic study of affinity relationships in cultured Citrus and its close relatives. Syst Bot 1: 105-136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Befu, M., A. Kitajima, Y.X. Ling & K. Hasegawa, 2000. Classification of 'Tosa-Buntan' pummelo (Citrus grandis [L.] Osb.), 'Washington' navel orange (C. sinensis [L.] Osb.) and trifoliate orange (Poncirus trifoliata [L.] Raf.) chromosomes using young leaves. J Japan Soc Hort Sci 69: 22-28.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Befu, M., A. Kitajima & K. Hasegawa, 2001. Chromosome composition of some citrus species and cultivars based on the chromomycin A3 (CMA). J Japan Soc Hort Sci 70: 83-88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coletta Filho, H.D., M.A. Machado, M.L.P.N. Targon, M.C.P.Q.D.G. Moreira & J. Pompeu Jr., 1998. Analysis of the genetic diversity among mandarins (Citrus spp.) using RAPD markers. Euphytica 102: 133-139.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Federici, C.T., D.Q. Fang, R.W. Scora & M.L. Roose. 1998. Phylogenic relationships within the genus Citrus (Rutaceae) and related genera as revealed by RFLP and RAPD analysis. Theor Appl Genet 96: 812-822.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fukui, K., 1996. Plant chromosome at mitosis. In: K. Fukui & S. Nakayama (Eds.), Plant Chromosome. Laboratory methods, pp. 1-17. CRC press, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guerra, M., 1993. Cytogenetics of Rutaceae. V. High chromosomal variability in Citrus species revealed by CMA/DAPI staining. Heredity 71: 234-241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handa, T. & C. Oogaki, 1985. Numerical taxonomic study of Citrus L. and Fortunella Swingle using morphological characters.-Application of multivariate analysis-. J Japan Soc Hort Sci 54: 145-154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handa, T., Y. Ishizawa & C. Oogaki, 1986. Phylogenic study of Fraction I protein in the genus Citrus and its close related genera. Japan J Genet 61: 15-24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirai, M. & I. Kajiura 1987. Genetic analysis of leaf isozymes in citrus. Japan J Breed 37: 377-388.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hizume, M., 1991. Analysis of plant chromosomes using a fluorescent banding method. Plant Cell Tech 3: 78-83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgeson, R.W., 1967. Horticulture varieties of citrus. In: W. Reuther, H.J. Webber & L.D.Batchelor (Eds.), The citrus industry. Vol. 1, pp. 431-591. Div Agric Sci, Univ California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwamasa, M, 1976. Cultivars of Citrus. Shizuoka Citrus Grower's Coop Assos, Shimizu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miranda, M., F. Ikeda, T. Endo, T. Moriguchi & M. Omura, 1997. Comparative analysis on the distribution of heterochromatin in Citrus, Poncirus and Fortunella chromosomes. Chromosome Res 5: 86-92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolosi, E., Z.N. Deng, A. Gentile, S. La Malfa, G. Continella & E. Tribulato, 2000. Citrus phylogeney and genetic origin of important species as investigated by molecular markers. Theor Appl Genet 100: 1155-1166.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pedrosa, A., D. Schweizer & M. Guerra, 2000. Cytological heterozygosity and hybrid origin of sweet orange [Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck]. Theor Appl Genet 100: 361-367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres, A.M., R.K. Soost & U. Deidenhofen, 1978. Leaf isozyme as genetic markers in citrus. Amer J Bot 65: 869-881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto, M., S. Kobayashi, Y. Nakamura & Y. Yamada, 1993. Phylogenic relationships of citrus revealed by RFLP analysis of mitochondrial and chloroplast DNA. Japan J Breed 43: 355-365.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yamamoto, M., Tominaga, S. High chromosomal variability of mandarins (Citrus spp.) revealed by CMA banding. Euphytica 129, 267–274 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022284908424

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022284908424

Navigation