Skip to main content
Log in

Genetic analysis of feed quality and seed weight of sorghum inbred lines and hybrids using analytical methods and NIRS

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Eight lines of grain sorghum and their F1hybrids were evaluated for contents of crude protein (CP), fat (FAT), and starch(STA); protein digestibility (PD); and in vitro dry matter disappearance (IVDMD).The effect of seed weight (SW) on these traits and the potential use of near infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) to predict them also were investigated. The male lines included three normal-seeded lines (TX2737, TX435, and P954063) and two large-seeded lines (PL-1 and Eastin1). The female lines included common U.S. seed parent lines (Wheatland, Redlan, andSA3042). The lines and their hybrids were grown under dry land conditions at Kansas State University experiment fields in Ashland and Belleville, Kansas, in 1999.The experiments were conducted using a randomized complete block design with four replications at each location. The effect of genotype was significant for all measured traits. The male parent lines were highly variable and expressed high levels of genetic variation in combining ability for CP, PD, STA, and SW. The female parents were genetically more uniform; however, significant general combining ability effects were noted for PD and SW. Significant negative correlations were noted between CP and STA and between SW and STA. Significant positive correlations were found between CP and SW and between FAT and IVDMD. Crude protein content was predicted accurately by NIRS. Fat content and IVDMD could not be predicted by NIRS. The NIRS equations based on ground samples were more accurate than those based on whole-seed samples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 16th edn. AOAC, Arlington, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axtell, J.D., A.W. Kirleis, M.M. Hassen, N.D. Mason, E.T. Mertz & L. Munck, 1981. Digestibility of Sorghum Proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78: 1333–1335.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beil, G.M. & R.E. Atkins, 1967. Estimates of general and specific combining ability in F1 hybrids for grain yield and its components in grain sorghum, Sorghum vulgare Pers. Crop Sci 7: 225–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bramel-Cox, P.J., M.A. Lauver & M.E. Witt, 1990. Potential gain from selection in grain sorghum for higher protein digestibility. Crop Sci 30: 521–524.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buffo, A.R., C.L. Weller & A. Parkhurt, 1998. Relationship among grain sorghum quality factors. Cereal Chem 75(1): 100–104.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Comstock, R.E. & H.F. Robinson, 1952. Estimation of average dominance of genes. In: J.W. Gowen (Ed.), Heterosis, pp. 494–516. Iowa State College Press, Ames, IA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D.J. & K.J. Frey, 1984. Combining ability and the selection of parents for interspecific oat matings. Crop Sci 24: 963–967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallauer, A.R. & J.B. Miranda, 1988. Quantitative Genetics in Maize Breeding. 2nd edn. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamaker, B.R., A.W. Kirleis, L.G. Butler, J.D. Axtell & E.T. Mertz, 1987. Improving the in vitro protein digestibility of sorghum with reducing agents. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84: 626–628.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hamaker, B.R., A.W. Kirleis, E.T. Mertz & J.D. Axtell, 1986. Effect of cooking on the protein profiles and in vitro digestibility of sorghum and maize. J Agric Food Chem 34: 647–649.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hibberd, C.A., R.L. Hintz & D.G.Wagner, 1980. The Effect of Location on the Nutritive Characteristics of Several Grain Sorghum Hybrids. Anim Sci Research Report. Agric Exp Station. Oklahoma State Univ. and USDA-SEA-AR.

  • Hibberd, C.A., E.D. Mitchell, D.G. Wagner & R.L. Hintz, 1979. Seed Characteristics of Different Varieties of Grain Sorghum. Anim Sci Research Report, MP-104. Agric Exp Station. Oklahoma State Univ. and USDA-SEA-AR.

  • Hibberd, C.A., D.G. Wagner, R.L. Hintz & D.D. Griffin, 1983. Effect of Sorghum Grain Variety and Processing Method on the Site and Extent of Starch Digestion in Steers. Agric Exp Station. Oklahoma State Univ. and USDA-SEA-AR. Anim Sci Res Report. MP-114.

  • Hibberd, C.A., D.G. Wagner, R.L. Schemm, E.D. Mitchell, Jr., R.L. Hintz & D.E. Weibel, 1982. Nutritive characteristics of different varieties of sorghum and corn grains. J Anim Sci 55: 665–672.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kansas Grain Sorghum Commission, 1997. Kansas grain sorghum quality study. www.ksgrains.com/sorghum

  • Keating, E.K., W.J., Saba, W.H. Hale & B. Taylor, 1965. Further observations on the digestion of milo and barley by steers and lambs. J Anim Sci 34: 1079.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, G.H.L., T.L. Walter, C.D. Nickell, & Y.O. Koh, 1969. Heritability estimates and interrelationships among agronomic traits in grain sorghum, Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench. Can J Genet Cytol 11: 199–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martens, H. & T. Naes, 1989. Multivariate Calibrations. John Wiley and Sons, Guilford, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mertz, E.T., M.M. Hassen, C. Cairns-Whitten, A.W. Kirleis, L. Tu & J.D. Axtell, 1984. Pepsin digestibility of proteins in sorghum and other major cereals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 81: 1–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oria, M.P., B.R. Hamaker & J.M. Schull, 1995. In vitro pepsin digestibility of developing and mature sorghum in grain in relation to α, β, and γ-kafirin disulfide crosslinking. J Cereal Sci 22: 85–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pazdernik, D.L., A.S. Killam & J.H. Orf, 1997. Analysis of amino and fatty acid composition in soybean seed, using near infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Agron J 89: 679–685.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, J.F., T. Milton & R.A. Mass, 2000. A twelve-hour in vitro procedure for sorghum grain feed quality assessment. Crop Sci 40: 204–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rooney, L.W. & R.L. Pflugfelder, 1986. Factors affecting starch digestibility with special emphasis on sorghum and corn. J Anim Sci 63: 1607–1623.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saba, W.J., W.H. Hale, F. Hubbert Jr., J. Kiernat & B. Taylor, 1964. Digestion of milo and barley by cattle. J Anim Sci 23: 533–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute, 1990. SAS/STAT User's Guide. Version 6. 4th edn. Vol. SAS Inst., Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sastry, L.V.S., J.W. Paulis, J.A. Bietz & J.S. Wall, 1986. Genetic variation of storage proteins in sorghum grain: Studies by isoelectric focusing and high-performance liquid chromatography. Cer Chem 63: 420–427.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schake, L.M., A. Driedger, J.K. Riggs & D.N. Clamme, 1976. Corn and grain sorghum evaluation for beef cattle. J Anim Sci 43: 959–965.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sepel, N.A. & O.F. Sepel, 1970. The effect of hybridization and external conditions on grain yield and quality in sorghum. Plant Breeding Abstr 40: 895.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeter, M.N., G.M. Hill, D.G. Wagner, C.A. Hibberd & F.N. Owens, 1990. The effect of sorghum grain variety on site and extent of digestion in beef heifers. J Anim Sci 68: 1121–1132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeter, M.N., G.M. Hill, D.G. Wagner, C.A. Hibberd & F.N. Owens, 1993. Chemical and physical properties and in vitro dry matter and starch digestion of eight sorghum grain hybrids and maize. Anim Feed Sci and Techn 44: 45–58.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Barneveld, R.J., J.D. Nuttall, P.C. Flinn & B.G. Osborne, 1999. Near infrared reflectance measurement of digestible energy content of cereals for growing pigs. J Near Infrared Spectrosc 7: 1–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, C.A., B.R. Hamaker & J.D. Axtell, 1998. Discovery of grain sorghum germplasm with high uncooked and cooked in vitro protein digestibilities. Cereal Chem 75: 665–670.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wester, T.J., S.M. Gramlich, R.A. Britton, & R.A. Stock, 1992. Effect of grain sorghum hybrid on in vitro rate of starch disappearance and finishing performance of ruminants. J Anim Sci 70: 2866–2876.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P.C., K.R. Preston, K.H. Norris & P.M. Starkey, 1984. Determination of amino acids in wheat and barley by near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy. J Food Sci 49: 17–20.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P.C. & D.C. Sobering, 1993. Comparison of commercial near infrared transmittance and reflectance instruments for analysis of whole grains and seeds. J Near Infrared Spectrosc 1: 25–32.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hicks, C., Tuinstra, M., Pedersen, J. et al. Genetic analysis of feed quality and seed weight of sorghum inbred lines and hybrids using analytical methods and NIRS. Euphytica 127, 31–40 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019943805514

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019943805514

Navigation