Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative Uptake Studies of Bioadhesive and Non-Bioadhesive Nanoparticles in Human Intestinal Cell Lines and Rats: The Effect of Mucus on Particle Adsorption and Transport

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose. The interaction of nanoparticles (NP), consisting of hydrophobic polystyrene, bioadhesive chitosan, and stealth PLA-PEG with two human intestinal cell lines, the enterocyte-like Caco-2 and mucus-secreting MTX-E12, was investigated and compared to the in vivo NP uptake in rats.

Methods. The extent and mechanism of cellular association of different NP with Caco-2 and MTX-E12 was investigated using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and a cellular association assay. In vitro results were compared to gastrointestinal distribution of chitosan NP in rats after intra-duodenal injection.

Results. Cellular association of NP with Caco-2 cell monolayers showed the following rank order: polystyrene > chitosan >> PLA-PEG. Mucus (MTX-E12) significantly decreased the association of hydrophobic polystyrene NP. While no mucus binding was observed for PLA-PEG, association of chitosan NP with mucus strongly increased. Intra-duodenal administration of chitosan NP in rats confirmed these in vitro results, demonstrating that NP could be detected in both epithelial cells and Peyer's patches. Chitosan NP internalization was saturable, as well as energy- and temperature-dependent. It could be inhibited by an excess of protamine and by removal of anionic sites of the apical membrane. By contrast, polystyrene NP uptake was found to be largely independent of these factors, except for a temperature-dependency.

Conclusions. In contrast to Caco-2 cells, the presence of mucus presented a major barrier for the uptake of hydrophobic polystyrene NP and showed an even more profound effect upon the uptake of chitosan NP. A correlation between the uptake in cell culture models and in vivo rat epithelial cells was confirmed for chitosan NP. Moreover, chitosan NP seemed to be taken up and transported by adsorptive transcytosis, while polystyrene NP uptake was probably mediated by non-adsorptive transcytosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. A. T. Florence. The oral absorption of micro-and nanoparticulates: neither exceptional nor unusual. Pharm. Res. 14:259–266 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  2. T. Jung, W. Kamm, A. Breitenbach, E. Kaiserling, J. X. Xiao, and T. Kissel. Biodegradable nanoparticles for oral delivery of peptides: is there a role for polymers to affect mucosal uptake? Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 50:147–160 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  3. N. Hussain, V. Jaitley, and A. T. Florence. Recent advances in the understanding of uptake of microparticulates across the gastrointestinal lymphatics. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 50:107–142 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. T. Florence, A. M. Hillery, N. Hussain, and P. U. Jani. Nanoparticles as carriers for oral peptide absorption: studies on particle uptake and fate. J. Control. Rel. 36:39–46 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. M. Hodges, E. A. Carr, R. A. Hazzard, and K. E. Carr. Uptake and translocation of microparticles in small intestine. Morphology and quantification of particle distribution. Dig. Dis. Sci. 40: 967–975 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  6. L. H. McMinn, G. M. Hodges, and K. E. Carr. Gastrointestinal uptake and translocation of microparticles in the streptozotocindiabetic rat. J. Anat. 189:553–559 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. P. Desai, V. Labhasetwar, G. L. Amidon, and R. J. Levy. Gastrointestinal uptake of biodegradable microparticles: effect of particle size. Pharm. Res. 13:1838–1845 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  8. K. E Carr, R. A. Hazzard, S. Reid, and G. M. Hodges. The effect of size on uptake of orally administered latex microparticles in the small intestine and transport to mesenteric lymph nodes. Pharm. Res. 13:1205–1209 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. P. Desai, V. Labhasetwar, E. Walter, R. J. Levy, and G. L. Amidon. The mechanism of uptake of biodegradable microparticles in Caco-2 cells is size dependent. Pharm. Res. 14:1568–1573 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  10. S. McClean, E. Prosser, E. Meehan, D. O'Malley, N. Clarke, Z. Ramtoola, and D. Brayden. Binding and uptake of biodegradable poly-DL-lactide micro-and nanoparticles in intestinal epithelia. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 6:153–163 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. Norris, N. Puri, and P. J. Sinko. The effect of physical barriers and properties on the oral absorption of particulates. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 34:135–154 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  12. D. A. Norris and P. J. Sinko. Effect of size, surface charge, and hydrophobicity on the translocation of polystyrene microspheres through gastrointestinal mucin. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 63:1481–1492 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Fernández-Urrusuno, P. Calvo, C. Remunan-Lopez, J. L. Vila-Jato, and M. J. Alonso. Enhancement of nasal absorption of insulin using chitosan nanoparticles. Pharm. Res. 16:1576–1581 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Tobío, R. Gref, A. Sanchez, R. Langer, and M. J. Alonso. Stealth PLA-PEG nanoparticles as protein carriers for nasal administration. Pharm Res. 15:270–275 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. D. Blanco and M. J. Alonso. Development and characterization of protein-loaded poly(lactide-co-glycolide) nanospheres. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 43:287–294 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  16. E. Walter and T. Kissel. Heterogeneity in the human intestinal cell line Caco-2 leads to differences in transepithelial transport. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 3:215–230 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  17. I. Behrens, P. Stenberg, A. Artursson, and T. Kissel. Transport of lipophilic drug molecules in a new mucus-secreting cell culture model based on HT29-MTX cells. Pharm. Res. 18:1138–1145 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  18. K. A. Mislick and J. D. Baldeschwieler. Evidence for the role of proteoglycans in cation-mediated gene transfer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 93:12349–12354 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  19. G. J. Russell-Jones, L. Arthur, and H. Walker. Vitamin B12-mediated transport of nanoparticles across Caco-2 cells. Int. J. Pharm. 179:247–255 (1999).

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. Wikman, J. Karlsson, I. Carlstedt, and P. Artursson. A drug absorption model based on the mucus layer producing human intestinal goblet cell line HT29-H. Pharm. Res. 10:843–852 (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  21. C.-M. Lehr, J. A. Bouwstra, E. H. Schacht, and H. E. Junginger. In vitro evaluation of mucoadhesive properties of chitosan and some other natural polymers. Int. J. Pharm. 78:43–48 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  22. B. Sandzen, H. Blom, and S. Dahlgren. Gastric mucus gel layer thickness measured by direct light microscopy. An experimental study in the rat. Scand. J. Gastroenterol. 23:1160–1164 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  23. A. M. Hillery and A. T. Florence. The effect of absorbed poloxamer 188 and 407 surfactants on the intestinal uptake of 60-nm polystyrene particles after oral administration in the rats. Int. J. Pharm. 132:123–130 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  24. M. R. Neutra and J. F. Forstner. Gastrointestinal mucus: Synthesis, Secretion, and Function. In L. R. Johnson (ed.). Physiology of the gastrointestinal tract, Raven Press, New York, 1987, pp. 975–1009.

    Google Scholar 

  25. R. Gref, Y. Minamitake, M. T. Peracchia, V. Trubetskoy, V. Torchilin, and R. Langer. Biodegradable long-circulating polymeric nanospheres. Science. 263:1600–1603 (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Y. Sai, M. Kajita, I. Tamai, J. Wakama, T. Wakamiya, and A. Tsuji. Adsorptive-mediated endocytosis of a basic peptide in enterocyte-like Caco-2 cells. Am. J. Physiol. 275:G514–520 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  27. P. Jani, G. W. Halbert, J. Langridge, and A. T. Florence. Nanoparticle uptake by the rat gastrointestinal mucosa: quantitation and particle size dependency. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 42:821–826 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Behrens, I., Pena, A.I.V., Alonso, M.J. et al. Comparative Uptake Studies of Bioadhesive and Non-Bioadhesive Nanoparticles in Human Intestinal Cell Lines and Rats: The Effect of Mucus on Particle Adsorption and Transport. Pharm Res 19, 1185–1193 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019854327540

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019854327540

Navigation