Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing the Complexity of Diversity Perceptions: Breadth, Depth, and Balance

  • Published:
Journal of Business and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the wealth of prescriptive information on how to manage diversity, relatively little attention has been paid to measures of workplace diversity. The present study developed a set of measures that practitioners and researchers can use to assess the degree to which members of an organization hold simple or complex views on workplace diversity. Three measures of perceptual complexity were defined and examined in the study: perceptual breadth, depth, and balance. Data collected from 266 participants in three different organizational settings revealed statistically significant differences on all three complexity measures. Practical implications of the study are discussed and directions for future research are identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Bartunek, J. M., Gordon, J. R., & Weathersby, R. P. (1983). Developing “complicated” understanding in administrators.Academy of Management Review,8,273–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieri, J., Atkins, A.L., Briar, S., Leaman, R. L. Miller, H. & Tripodi, T. (1966). Clinical and social judgment: The discrimination of behavioral information.New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carraher, S. M., & Buckley, M. R. (1996). Cognitive complexity and the perceived dimensionality of pay satisfaction.Journal of Applied Psychology,81(1),102–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, K. F. (1998). Breaking barriers.Human Resource Executive,September, 39–44.

  • Coren, S., & Suedfeld, P. (1995). Personality correlates of conceptual complexity.Journal of Social Behavior and Personality,10(1), 229–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, T., Jr. (1993). Cultural diversity in organizations: Theory, research, and practice.San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, T. H., & Beale, R. L. (1997). Developing competency to manage diversity: Readings, cases & activities. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, T. H., & Blake, S. (1991). Managing cultural diversity: Implications for organizational competitiveness.Academy of Management Executive,5,45–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Meuse, K. P., & Hostager, T. J. (2001). Developing an instrument for measuring attitudes and perceptions of workplace diversity: An initial report.Human Resource Development Quarterly,12(1), 33–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1998). Attitude structure and function. In D.T. Gilbert, S.T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed.) (Vol. 1: pp. 269–322).Boston: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eiseman, J. (1978). Reconciling “incompatible” positions.Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,14, 133–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, C., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. (1994). Diverse approaches to managing diversity.Human Resource Management,33,79–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, J. P., & Barr, M. (1993). The diversity advantage.New York: Lexington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, B. A. (1997). Make the business case for diversity.HRMagazine,42(5),118–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galen, M. (1994).White, male, and worried.Business Week,January 31, 50–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J., & Baron, R. A. (2000). Behavior in organizations: Understanding and managing the human side of work (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hostager, T. J., & De Meuse, K. P. (2001). Assessing Perceptions of Workplace Diversity: The Development and Application of Three Perceptual Complexity Measures (Tech. Rep. No. 1). Eau Claire, WI: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kossek, E. E., & Zonia, S. C. (1993). Assessing diversity climate: A field study of reactions to employer efforts to promote diversity.Journal of Organizational Behavior,14, 61–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandell, B., & Kohler-Gray, S. (1990). Management development that values diversity. Personnel,67,41–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mor Barak, M. E., Cherin, D. A., & Berkman, S. (1998). Organizational and personal dimensions in diversity climate: Ethnic and gender differences in employee perceptions. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,34(1),82–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munk, N. (1998). The new organization man.Fortune,March 16,62–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, K. (1993). The unfortunate side effects of diversity training.The New York Times, Section 3, August 1, 5.

  • Owens, R. (1997). Diversity: A bottomline issue.Workforce, March, 3–5. 206 JOURNAL OF BUSINESS AND PSYCHOLOGY

  • Rosenberg, M. J., & Hovland, C. I. (1960). Cognitive, affective and behavioral components of attitude. In M. J. Rosenberg, C. I. Hovland, W. J. McGuire, R. P. Abelson, & J. H. Brehm, Attitude organization and change (pp. 1–14). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rynes, S. & Rosen, B. (1995). A field survey of factors affecting the adoption and perceived success of diversity training. Personnel Psychology, 48, 247–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satish, U., & Streufert, S. (1997). The measurement of behavioral complexity.Journal of Applied Social Psychology,27, 2117–2121.

    Google Scholar 

  • SPSS, Inc. (1993). SPSS for windows, advanced statistics, release 6.0, 391–441. Chicago.

  • Streufert, S., & Streufert, S. (1978). Behavior in the complex environment. Washington, D.C.: V.H. Winston & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streufert, S., Streufert, S. C., & Castore, C.H. (1968).Leadership in negotiations and the complexity of conceptual structure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52, 218–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streufert, S., & Swezey, R. W. (1986). Complexity, managers and organizations. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stutz, J., & Massengale, R. (1997). Measuring diversity initiatives. HRMagazine, 42, 85–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, D. L., Morris, L., & Romero, J. (1996). Changes in attitude after diversity training. Training & Development, 50(9), 54–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, D. A., & Ely, R. J. (1996). Making differences matter: A new paradigm for managing diversity. Harvard Business Review, 74(5),79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, R. R. (1990). From affirmative action to affirming diversity. Harvard Business Review, 68(2), 107–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, R. R. (1991). Beyond race and gender: Unleashing the power of your total workforce by managing diversity.New York: AMACOM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, R. R. (1996). Redefining diversity. New York: AMACOM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Triandis, H. C. (1977). Interpersonal behavior. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, M.L. (1995). Diversity: Business rationale and strategies (Report #1130-95-RR). New York: The Conference Board.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Todd J. Hostager.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hostager, T.J., De Meuse, K.P. Assessing the Complexity of Diversity Perceptions: Breadth, Depth, and Balance. Journal of Business and Psychology 17, 189–206 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019681314837

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019681314837

Navigation