Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of Preflo® Modified Starches as New Direct Compression Excipients. I. Tabletting Characteristics

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This investigation evaluated some new (Preflo®) and existing commercially available (Starch 1500, Star Tab) modified starches as direct compression excipients. Preflo® corn starches (CH-10, CH-20, CH-30) and Preflo® potato starches (P-250, PI-10, PJ-20) were evaluated and compared with respect to their pharmaceutical properties such as particle size, density, flowability, friability, and compression properties. Preflo® starches showed a high bulk density and good flowability. Preflo® corn starches and Star Tab formed harder tablets than Preflo® potato starches and Starch 1500. Data from the Athy-Heckel plots indicated that the Preflo® starches are soft materials and, unlike Starch 1500, undergo plastic deformation. Tablets containing acetaminophen were also compressed with the starches and disintegration and dissolution studies were conducted. Starch 1500 tablets disintegrated in 3.5 min, whereas none of the Preflo® starch tablets disintegrated in 30 min. While complete acetaminophen release occurred in 25 min from Starch 1500 tablets, the drug dissolution time from Preflo® starch tablets varied from 4 to 12 hr, indicating a potential use for some of these starches in solid oral modified-release dosage forms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. R. Parvez and S. Bolton. Evaluation of a new fine particulate cellulose as a direct compression tablet aid. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 11:565–583 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. M. Guyot-Hermann, D. Leblanc, and M. Dragnet-Brughmans. Gamma sorbitol as a diluent in tablets. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 11:551–564 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  3. G. K. Bolhuis, G. Reichman, C. F. Lerk, H. V. van Kamp, and K. Zuurman. Evaluation of anhydrous α-lactose, a new excipient in direct compression. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 11:1657–1681 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  4. O. K. Udeala and A. Chukwu. Tabletting properties of Musol, a new direct compression vehicle. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 12:1587–1612 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. Doelker, D. Mordier, H. Iten, and P. Humbert-Droz. Comparative tabletting properties of sixteen microcrystalline celluloses. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 13:1847–1875 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  6. B. B. Sheth, F. J. Bandelin, and R. F. Shangraw. Compressed Tablets. In H. A. Lieberman and L. Lachman (eds.), Pharmaceutical Dosage Form: Tablets, Vol. 1, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York (1980) pp. 147–148.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. N. Staniforth. Relationship between particle packing and the physical stability of powder mixes. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 37:692–697 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  8. A. Martin, J. Swarbrick, and A. Cammarata. Physical Pharmacy, 3rd edition, Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, 1983, pp. 513–514.

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. A. Wadke and H. Jacobson. Preformulation testing. In H. A. Lieberman and L. Lachman (eds.), Pharmaceutical Dosage Form: Tablets, Vol. 1, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1980, pp. 44-46.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. R. Fassihi and I. Kanfer. Effect of compressibility and powder flow properties on tablet weight variation. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm. 12:1947–1966 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  11. H. Leuenberger and B. D. Rohera. Fundamentals of powder compression. I. The compactibility and compressibility of pharmaceutical powders. Pharm. Res. 3:65–74 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. M. Salpekar and L. L. Augsburger. Magnesium lauryl sulfate in tableting: Effect on ejection force and compressibility. J. Pharm. Sci. 63:289–293 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. F. Asker, K. M. Saied, and M. M. Abdel-Khalek. Investigation of some materials as dry binders for direct compression in tablet manufacture. Pharmazie, 30:373–376 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. L. Carr. Evaluating flow properties of solids. Chem. Eng. 72:163–168 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  15. E. L. Parrott. Pharmaceutical Technology, Burgess, Minneapolis, 1970, p. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. I. Wells. Pharmaceutical Preformulation: The Physicochemical Properties of Drug Substances, Ellis Horwood, Chichester, England, 1988, p. 210.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. E. Rees and P. J. Rue. Time-dependent deformation of some direct compression excipients. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 30:601–607 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. F. Shangraw. Compressed tablets by direct compression. In H. A. Lieberman, L. Lachman, and J. B. Schwartz (eds.), Pharmaceutical Dosage Form: Tablets, Vol. 1, 2nd ed., Marcel Dekker, New York, 1989, pp. 209–210.

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. W. Heckel. Density-pressure relationships in powder compaction. Trans. Metall. Soc. AIME 221:671–675 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  20. R. W. Heckel. An analysis of powder compaction phenomena. Trans. Metall. Soc. AIME 221:1001–1008 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Z. T. Chowhan and Y. P. Chow. Compression properties of granulations made with binders containing different moisture contents. J. Pharm. Sci. 70:1134–1139 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sanghvi, P.P., Collins, C.C. & Shukla, A.J. Evaluation of Preflo® Modified Starches as New Direct Compression Excipients. I. Tabletting Characteristics. Pharm Res 10, 1597–1603 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018968502586

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018968502586

Navigation