Abstract
Agricultural soils provide a prospective way of mitigating the increasing atmospheric concentration of CO2. A number of agricultural practices are known to stimulate the accumulation of additional soil carbon and early indications are that some might sequester carbon at relatively modest costs with generally positive environmental effects. We discuss, under 10 themes, policy and economic issues that will determine whether programs for sequestration of carbon in agricultural soils can succeed. The issues involve contexts for implementation, economics, private property rights, agricultural policy, and institutional and social structures. Ultimately, success will depend on the incentive structure developed and the way in which carbon sequestration is integrated into the total fabric of agricultural policy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Adams, R. M., Chang, C. C., McCarl, B. A., and Callaway, J. M.: 1992, 'The Role of Agriculture in Climate Change: A Preliminary Evaluation of Emission Control Strategies', in Reilly, J. M. and Anderson, M. (eds.), Economics Issues in Global Climate Change: Agriculture, Forestry, and Natural Resources, Westview Press, pp. 273–287.
Antle, J.M.: 2000, Economic Feasibility of Using Soil Carbon Sequestration Policies and Markets to Alleviate Poverty and Enhance Sustainability of the World's Poorest Farmers, Paper presented at the Expert Workshop on Carbon Sequestration, Sustainable Agriculture, and Poverty Alleviation held at the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), Geneva, Switzerland, August 31, 2000 (http://www.climate.montana.edu/).
Antle, J. M. and Mooney, S.: 1999, Economics and Policy Design for Soil Carbon Sequestration in Agriculture, Research Discussion Paper No. 36, Trade Research Center, Montana State University, Bozeman, October (http://www.climate.montana.edu/).
Bolin, B.: 1998, 'The Kyoto Negotiations on Climate Change: A Science Perspective', Science 279, 330–331.
Canada: 1998, in UNFCCC, Subsidiary Body for Scientific and Technological Advice, Report FCCC/SBSTA/1998/Misc.6/Add1, Additional submissions by Parties, at http://fccc.de.
Council of Economic Advisers, Executive Office of the President: 1998, The Kyoto Protocol and the President's Policies to Address Climate Change: Administration Economic Analysis, July.
Energy Information Administration, U.S. Department of Energy: 1998, Impacts of the Kyoto-Protocol on U.S. Energy Markets and Economic Activity, SR/OIAF/98-03, October.
Epplin, F.M. and Al-Sakkaf, G. A.: 1995, 'Risk-Efficient Tillage Systems and Program Participation Strategies for Land Subject to Conservation Compliance', Rev. Agr. Econ. 17: 311–321.
IPCC: 2000, Land Use, Land-use Change, and Forestry, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a Special Report of the IPCC, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
Klemme, R. M.: 1985, 'A Stochastic Dominance Comparison of Reduced Tillage Systems in Corn and Soybean Production under Risk', Amer. J. Agric. Econ. 67: 550–557.
Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change: 1998, 'Climate Change Secretariat', UNFCCC, http://www.cop3.de, March.
Lal, R., Kimble, J. M., Follett, R. F., and Cole, C. V.: 1998, The Potential of U.S. Cropland to Sequester Carbon and Mitigate the Greenhouse Effect, Sleeping Bear Press, Inc., Chelsea MI, p. 128.
Magleby, R., Sandretto, C. Crosswhite, W., and Osborn, C. T.: 1995, Soil Erosion and Conservation in the United States – An Overview, USDA, ERS, Agric. Info. Bull. No. 718.
Manne, A. and Richels, R. G.: 1998, The Kyoto Protocol: A Cost-Effective Strategy for Meeting Environmental Objectives?, unpublished manuscript, Stanford University, July.
Marland, G. and Schlamadinger, B.: 1997, 'Forests for Carbon Sequestration or Fossil Fuel Substitution A Sensitivity Analysis', Biomass Bioenergy 13, 389–397.
McCarl, B. A.: 1998, Carbon Sequestration via Tree Planting on Agricultural Lands: An Economic Study of Costs and Policy Design Alternatives, Unpublished Report, Texas A&M University, College Station on the web page agrinet.tamu.edu/mccarl.
McCarl, B. A. and Schneider, U.: 1999, 'Curbing Greenhouse Gases: Agriculture's Role', Choices, first quarter, 9–12.
McCarl, B. A. and Schneider, U.: 2000a, 'Agriculture's Role in a Greenhouse Gas Emission Mitigation World: An Economic Perspective', Rev. Agr. Econ. 22, 134–159.
McCarl, B. A. and Schneider, U.: 2000b, 'Economic Potential of Biomass for Greenhouse Gas Emission Reductions: Comparative Role in Agriculture', in Proceedings of conference on Sustainable Energy: New Challenges for Agriculture and Implications for Land Use, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
McCarl, B. A., Gowen, M., and Yeats, T.: 1997, An Impact Assessment of Climate Change Mitigation Policies and Carbon Permit Prices on the U.S. Agricultural Sector, Climate Change Policies and Programs Division, USEPA, Washington, D.C.
Metting, F. B., Smith, J. L., and Amthor, J. S.: 2000, 'Science Needs and New Technology for Soil Carbon Sequestration', this volume.
Pierzynski, G. M., Sims, J. T., and Vance, G. F.: 1994, Soils and Environmental Quality, Lewis Publishers, CRC Press, Boca Raton FL.
Post, W. M., Izaurralde, R. C., Mann, L. K., and Bliss, N.: 2000, 'Monitoring and Verifying Soil Organic Carbon Sequestration', this volume.
Schneider, U.: 2000, Agricultural Sector Analysis on Greenhouse Gas Emission Mitigation in the United States, Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University.
Trimble, S. W. and Crosson, P.: 2000, 'U.S. Soil Erosion Rates – Myth and Reality', Science 289, 248–250.
Tyner, W., Abdallah, M., Bottum, C., Doering, O., McCarl, B. A., Miller, W., Liljedahl, B., Peart R., Richey, C., Barber, S., and Lechtenberg, V.: 1979, The Potential of Producing Energy from Agriculture, Purdue School of Agriculture, Final Report to Office of Technology Assessment, U.S. Congress.
United Nations: 1992, Framework Convention on Climate Change, United Nations Environment Programme Information Unit for Conventions, http://www.unep.ch.
Weyant, J. and Hill, J.: 1999, 'Introduction and Overview', Special Issue: The Costs of the Kyoto Protocol: A Multi Model Evaluation: Energy Journal'.
Wigley, T. M. L.: 1998, 'The Kyoto Protocol: CO2, CH4 and Climate Implications', Geophys. Res. Lett. 25, 2285–2288.
Williams, J. R., Llewelyn, R. V., and Barnaby, G. A: 1990, 'Risk Analysis of Tillage Alternatives with Government Programs', Amer. J. Agric. Econ. 72: 172–181.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Marland, G., McCarl, B.A. & Schneider, U. Soil Carbon: Policy and Economics. Climatic Change 51, 101–117 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017575018866
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017575018866