Skip to main content
Log in

Drug Absorption Through Mucosal Membranes: Effect of Mucosal Route and Penetrant Hydrophilicity

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The influence of mucosal route and penetrant hydrophilicity on the in vivo absorption of a model lipophilic compound, progesterone, was investigated in ovariectomized rabbits. The absorption rate and systemic bioavailability of progesterone and its monohydroxy, dihydroxy, and trihydroxy derivatives were evaluated and compared following oral, nasal, rectal, and vaginal administrations. Nasal delivery resulted in a significantly higher rate and extent of progesterone absorption than oral, rectal, or vaginal administration. The rate and extent of mucosal absorption decreased as penetrant hydrophilicity increased for the nasal, rectal, and vaginal routes. The results of this investigation indicate that the absorption characteristics of a lipophilic compound, such as progesterone, are influenced by the properties of both the mucosa and the drug.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. D. C. Corbo, Y. C. Huang, and Y. W. Chien. Int. J. Pharm. 46:133–140 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  2. G. F. X. David, C. P. Puri, T. C. A. Kumar, and C. Anand. Experientia 37:533–534 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  3. A. A. Hussain, S. Hirai, and R. Bawarshi. J. Pharm. Sci. 70:466–467 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Askel and G. S. Jones. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 118:466–472 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. J. Nillus and E. D. B. Johansson. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 110:470–477 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  6. B. Villaneuva, R. F. Casper, and S. S. C. Yen. Fertil. Steril. 35:433–437 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  7. E. R. Myers, S. J. Sondheimer, E. W. Freeman, J. F. Strauss, and K. Richels. Fertil. Steril. 47:71–75 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. M. A. Glazener, I. Bailey, and M. G. R. Hull. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 92:364–368 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  9. D. C. Corbo, Y. C. Huang, and Y. W. Chien. Int. J. Pharm. 50: 252–260 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. G. Hardy, S. W. Lee, and C. G. Wilson. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 37:294–297 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  11. C. H. Huang, R. Kimura, R. Bawarshi-Nassar, and A. Hussain. J. Pharm. Sci. 74:1298–1301 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  12. S. Hirai, T. Yashiki, T. Matsuzawa, and H. Mima. Int. J. Pharm. 7:317–325 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. N. Fisher, K. Brown, S. S. Davis, G. D. Parr, and D. A. Smith. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 39:357–362 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  14. C. McMartin, L. E. F. Hutchinson, R. Hyde, and G. E. Peters. J. Pharm. Sci. 76:535–540 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. C. Caron and B. Shroot. J. Pharm. Sci. 73:1703–1706 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  16. R. E. Gibson and L. S. Olanoff. J. Control. Rel. 6:361–366 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  17. E. B. Brittebo and J. J. Rafter. J. Steroid Biochem. 20:1147–1151 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Corbo, D.C., Liu, JC. & Chien, Y.W. Drug Absorption Through Mucosal Membranes: Effect of Mucosal Route and Penetrant Hydrophilicity. Pharm Res 6, 848–852 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015952320372

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015952320372

Navigation